The Erotic Highway

Does Onlyfans violate SA policy?
sweetman 93 Reviews 536 reads
posted
1 / 4

You've probably all seen the warning from SA Admin that appears at the bottom of the page whenever you receive a first, unsolicited DM from someone on your message inbox.  It disappears on subsequent message exchanges. It says "Never send or ask for money or gift cards before meeting. Never share or request banking information. Report anyone who does.".  This is awkwardly worded. Report anyone who does...what?? Anyone who asks for banking info?  Anyone who asks for $$/gift cards before meeting? Both?

I recently received a DM from a SB that consisted in it's entirety of her onlyfans address.  No words, not even so much as a Hi There!  While I applaud her entrepreneurial spirit, I really hate seeing the SA platform used for such blatantly commercial purposes. Does her DM violate SA policy?  Should I report her?

As many experienced SDs have commented on this board, it's probably a good idea to NOT draw attention to oneself on SA. So I probably will lay low and not report this activity. Still I'd appreciate your take on this. Do you agree this sort of thing negatively dilutes SA's usefulness, should SA ban this, or am I just an old codger who should write less and get laid more?  Hey, that's a good idea!  I have a date with a super hot 24yo tomorrow which I'm sure will realign my priorities!

herbtcat 6 Reviews 54 reads
posted
2 / 4

... I had to take time to think this through.  

 
Here are my thoughts:  
1. I did a wide search (1,000 miles and no filters) for "onlyfans" in profiles and got 22 hits.  Most of them mentioned they had an OF account, one gave her OF account name, and one specified she did NOT have OF.  The newest profile was 2 months old, the oldest was 5 years old.  So,  
2. It appears that mentioning OF is not a TOS violation in a profile.  
3. Having and offering an OF account is not illegal and is not prostitution. It is, by it's nature, LEGAL sex work if the content is explicit. So I see offering OF as a platform to sell  content, not an explicit (or implicit)  P4P agreement.
4. There is a  side discussion on the idea of a POT SB using her profile to promote her legal business. I think of strippers with profiles that name their club and invite SD's to meet her there.  Is it a good strategy? What if she was a barista at Starbucks and asked SD's to come in for a latte?  Legal - I think so.  TOS violation - Not sure. Effective strategy to get more business - doubtful. Effective strategy to convert a POT SD into an arrangement - also doubtful.  
5. Messages:  We have all speculated, and with good reason - that SA monitors message content. This is probably a mix of automated message parsing for key words and phrases, and queuing flagged posts for human review.  
6. So if that speculation is correct, it seems reasonable that SA could easily scan for the term "onlyfans" in every message. If they do, then the message PaPa Sweet received likely did not violate TOS even with the OF mention.  

 
My conclusions:  
- Probably not a TOS violation as posted.
- Could be a TOS violation if combined with any additional text about P4P, or advance cash requests, or requests for banking & other PII (Personally Identifiable Information).  
- Probably not a successful strategy to get an arrangement with one or more SD's.  
- Unknown if it is a violation of her OF TOS.  

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

sweetman 93 Reviews 44 reads
posted
3 / 4

All true, but it's still annoying as hell, right?  I assumed she was simply sending her onlyfans address to hundreds/thousands of SDs.  If I'm right, she was spamming and that's def a violation of the TOS.  even if it has nothing to do with illegal activities.  Anyway, I need to get laid and quit obsessing about shit I can't control!

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 42 reads
posted
4 / 4

In general I am against narcing on someone who isn't doing anything illegal, even if it might be annoying.

Register Now!