There will always be those that are more comfortable working on some machine to replace human contact, than to have real human contact.  But this is a reflection of their own dysfunctions and inabilities to relate to real women, and not because fake is better than real.  

We already have lots of experience with a totally immersive medium called movies- something with which you sound very familiar.  We sit in a dark isolation chamber with bright lights and overpowering audio systems to stimulate our senses and create a fantasy environment and suspend disbelief.

But when it's all over and you walk outside, wouldn't you still rather go to Paris than just see a movie about Paris?  One will always be a shallow substitute for the other, and that applies about 100 times over for a real sexual relationship with a woman versus a simulated sexual experience with a device- even a sophisticated device.

I'm afraid in the end, all this effort to create a better artificial fuck is sadly misdirected by people who miss the point of it all.  The "Orgasmatron" remains the fantasy of the emotionally stunted who would be better served working on their interpersonal skills with live women than trying to trying to perfect a substitute for them.

Men already don't NEED women for sex.  We WANT women for sex...well, at least I do!  No technology is ever going to replace the touch of a woman, her smile, her laughter or the intimacy that can exist between two people.