The body type choices offered to both SB's and SD's on Seeking are hopelessly inadequate.  And the criteria for each choice is based purely on the user's subjective POV.   I often find pics of women I think of as slim or athletic tagged as average. And I even see pics tagged as curvy from women who have a slim waist, big tits and a nice apple butt. Technically, these women have curves. But to my perspective, they are anything BUT the chubbies normally tagged as curvy.  And to be fair, there are SD's out there who actually prefer the Rubenesque physique - aka fatties.  

 
What to do about it? Unless you think you can get seeking to implement a much more objective setting (BMI? height/weight stats? tits-waist-hips measurements?), you just have to deal with it.  The search filters are a weak attempt to get you specific, objective results from a non-specific, subjective, self-evaluating horde (whorde?) of women.  Ultimately you will still need to rely on the old "Mark I" Eyeballs System to evaluate your choices.  

 
Now if you can find a way to code your libido into your web browser, patent that shit and take to Google asap.  

 
Life is good

 
The Cat

IF only I could...IF only I could  LOL

Wasn't trying on bringing up a topic we talked about before, but moreso I can't help shake my head at the girls who somehow feel they are slim, where, in my eye, they are obviously FAT.  

Honestly, if I tighten my search parameters up to SLIM, I probably really won't miss that many desirable ones, even with the number of hits falling to half.

But most fat people have been mocked for their fatness at some point.  So in the vast majority of cases, they are aware of their condition.  There is the trendy fat-is-beautiful movement, but even there the admission has to precede the acceptance.
.
So the motivations for lying about girth probably hover around the idea that once they get you near them, their great personality will hook you.  I mean that's a major romantic movie trope.