Hi all, I just read Brandon Wade's latest blogpost.  It's a small masterpiece of appearing surprised without actually saying anything much.  He is responding to Google Play Store's policy banning sites that promote “compensated sexual relationships” and says this ban does not apply to SA. It may be the height of disingenuousness, but we have to acknowledge that he is trying to protect our interests as well as his.  The most important statements for us SDs to consider are his allegations that:
1. SA polices their site, with teams working 24/7 from 3 countries
2. SA bans users who violate their rules.
3. SA uses AI to scan for images and transactional language
4. SA has a self policing community
My take away from this is that we need to be really careful about how we conduct ourselves on the site, especially when discussing allowances.  The women we talk to are mostly unaware of the risks.  Way too often I get asked "how much will you pay me" sort of questions. Or recently one said "we could start off with PPM and then see how it goes".   That sort of language might not get them banned, but it sure as fuck would get us banned!  Previously I simply used euphemisms.  For example, instead of saying PPM I said gift per visit.  But now with their new increased vigilance, I hesitate to discuss money at all.  But I don't want to appear evasive!  Or cheap! And let's face it, lots of these girls are sick and tired of beating around the bush and want to know upfront what you are offering them.  

So for the time being my response goes something like this.  "I approve of the role that $ugar plays in an arrangement and consider it a privilege to help my SB. But I prefer to discuss specifics offsite."  Then I suggest moving to email or text.  Just be careful in your own language not to do anything which could be construed as promoting compensated sexual relationships.