If you've seen a porn made in the last 20 years, you've seen Ron. You've probably seen WAY too much of him. I've seen more of his nooks and crannies than I did my last girlfriend.

While his hair-covered weeble-wobble body is physically repulsive, in one sense, I think it's a good thing I've seen so much of it.

Seeing Ron naked is good for a young man's self-image.

While young women were looking at unrealistic images of women in fashion magazines, I was looking at this fat, hairy man as an example of the mature male form.

Young girls think, "If I just purge a few more meals, I'll be glamorous like Kate Moss!"
I thought, "If I just grow more hair on my back, I'll get laid like Ron Jeremy!"

Who's to say who had it worse?

I'll tell you who has it worst: The fledgling porn starlet.

Imagine her first day on the set:

Her nipple scars are almost healed from her 3rd boob job.
She's achieved an almost Dostoevsky-esque state of super-morality.
She's embraced her sexuality and is ready to turn-on the world.m
Then the director looks into her big sparkling eyes and says, "You gotta fuck that guy." While pointing to Ron Jeremy.

Why is this man in adult films? Perhaps because ugly guys like to watch Ron is action and think to themselves, "If she would fuck *that* guy, surely she'd fuck me"

Yeah, he's got a big dick. But I spent enough time in locker rooms to know that there are well-endowed, attractive guys out there. Perhaps he gets the "acting" roles because he's an exceptional thespian. I have no way to judge because I always fast forward through the dialogue (I'd much rather spend my time sneaking peeks in locker rooms). Maybe I'm wrongfully judging a book by its fat and hairy cover. Perhaps, like Cyrano Debergerac, Ron's inner beauty and romantic soul ignites women's passions.

Perhaps.

But the fact remains that the man is repulsive. Watching him have sex with a pretty young girl is less an arousing act than it is a circus act. It's like watching a geek bite the head off a chicken. Disgusting and fascinating.

I think the difference between erotica and obscenity, is the presence of Ron Jeremy.

So, while I appreciate his icon status, I hate what he does to porn. He makes it so dirty. There is no chance in hell those women *want* to be having sex with him. That ruins it for me. You'd think that naked people having sex would be enough. But no! I want to at least have the *illusion* that the women are enjoying it. With Ron Jeremy in the picture, that's impossible.

Perhaps I'm just jealous because his manhood is *significantly* bigger than mine.

Perhaps.

Shit Wagon he stunk so bad! He had a couple of hottie's with him, but I don't know how they withstood the stench!  He's foul!

I also met him and I could smell him halfway across the room. YUCK!

Naughtiness
Kadi

Someone made a movie about him a few years ago.  I saw it on video.  His single claim to fame is (or was?) his ability to get an erection on cue, which makes the production of low budget porno films much easier.  With the advent of Viagra, Jeremy’s porno career mostly ended.  He has worked very hard to make it as a legitimate film actor, but with little success.  I briefly worked with his father, who is a real piece of work himself.

-- Modified on 3/20/2005 9:03:31 AM

Porn work for guys has become a bit more of a respectable(better paying?) choice in the last few years, so I have noticed better looking/more buff guys, but there is something to what you say. Average looking guy, RJ in this case, gets to hump pretty porn babe, and that sells to the masses. But bottom line, a big crank is still pretty much a prerequisite.

One of the reasons RJ got so much work in the 80s and in to the 90s, the dude showed up at the set on time, ready to work, and could get it up and pop on cue, IOW a pro. At least that's the way the story was relayed to me by a lady I saw as an escort, whose also done a fair amount of porno films including shooting with RJ. Someone once said that 75% of life is just showing up.

Last, guys that think doing porno work would be a blast....it's hard work. I did a still photo, hardcore series of shots with a lady I see as a client back east just for fun. Her photog took the pics, digital cam, umbrellas, lights, back drops. Angles have to be right, the flash lights are hot and can blind you, camera is a nuisance and it takes concentration to stay hard and take direction, stay focused and in frame...IOW, not a career choice I'd recommend. MfSD>>>>






-- Modified on 3/20/2005 9:49:14 AM

...your one conjecture was correct.  As I understand it, the powers that be in porn reasoned that Ron "troglodyte" Jeremy had appeal because he was so repulsive.  The thinking was  if you have a scene where a breath-takingly beautiful woman gets laid by him, then every poor, downright-ugly male driven to porn as their only sexual outlet would feel they had some hope, or at least be given a proxy for their fantasy.  And that most guys in that position liked to feel like they had an unrecognized somewhat hidden assets to them, which in porn couldn't be depicted better than Jeremy's giant cock.

(Added to it the fact that the male star right then just wasn't considered that important in porn.  Jeremy was willing to work on anything, probably for cheap, and would show up on time.  I notice that it seems that anytime a woman really took charge of a production, like Hyapatia Lee, Brandy Alexander or Annie Sprinkle are said to have done, Jeremy doesn't seem to appear.  Evidence that they were, at least somewhat, really in charge.)  

And it worked.  I'd say that was definitely his appeal.  Great for the poor ugly guy's hope and self-esteem, and I say, more power to them.  Terrible for the rest of us.  I recoil from any scene with him.  For the same reason I don't watch gay porn.  I don't resent it; I'm just not in that demographic.        

BTW, I believe Christy Canyon has an account of her fledgling encounter with Jeremy.  Unfortunately, I didn't get to that.  I only got to the part where people working on the production were saying "How could they be matching this poor girl with Ron?"  I might post her account of her first meeting with Jeremy later in the thread.



-- Modified on 3/20/2005 10:41:40 AM

-- Modified on 3/21/2005 1:47:13 AM

Ron Jeremy gets rolls because he is one of the biggest executives in the porn business. In short, he controls most if not all of the production that he stars in.
You should feel sorry for the fledgling porn actress, they are getting screwed in many ways. First, they are expendable, there are many hot young girls willing to get pumped in front of a camera, also, the porn kings are scouring the world to find beautiful young women in eastern europe that will do the hardest core porn for peanuts. Second, there are too few women porn producers, so young women breaking into the business do not have older role models that they can talk to on the set.
All one has to do is look at some of the sites that offer dates with porn stars. How many men do you see offering themselves up? Have you ever seen the top male stars like Peter North offering themselves to any person with the funds to spend time with them?

you write:  
there are too few women porn producers, so young women breaking into the business do not have older role models that they can talk to on the set......All one has to do is look at some of the sites that offer dates with porn stars. How many men do you see offering themselves up? Have you ever seen ..male stars ..offering themselves to any person with the funds to spend time with them?

You write that like its a bad thing?  seems to me that the women are extending the life of their fame on a level that the men cannot.  The truth is, I don't care what a man's dick or personality was like - I wouldn't pay to spend time with him - and most women wouldn't. No matter how beautiful or ugly a woman is, she can get laid any saturday night at almost any bar in america - and that's not the case with men....so my thought is that this is a market segment that women porn stars are exploiting - men don't do it because the demand just isn't there.

Oh. and Ron Jeremy does smell.

..and don't even think of getting me started on Ed Powers.

I'm in the process of starting an adult movie production company and we've had to cancel the first 2 filmings because the men didn't show.  I'm past the point in my life of standing in, but it's still difficult to believe that a guy wouldn't be early to get laid AND paid.  You do encounter a different breed in this business, or at least that's been my experience so far.

As an aside, we're trying to find men that women (customers) will find appealing, and have a plot to most of the scripts.  I'd appreciate feedback on those ideas.

Thanks

my point graphically clear. Men control the porn business, the male actors and producers control the money flow. The women that work in the industry are the bit players, they can be replaced at any time by a young, new faces. If you think being in that predicament is empowering, then go ahead and believe what you will.
Guys like Ron Jeremy and Peter North do not need to work as male escorts top make money - plus, they surely have all the fresh women that they want. I do not get deeply involved in porn other than from viewing it from a business perspective. Little has changed in the industry in the last 10 years - well, maybe not everything, porn producers can now hire eastern european women that will work for a fraction of what US born women will work for and as a consequence, the pay of all porn actresses is consistently falling while the producers are distributing the product into sales channels worth billions of dollars.

...so many providers have asked me to wear a Ron Jeremy mask during our time together?

...I get that request all the time.

a friend of mine wrote that.

75% of life is just showing up. I spoke with another gal who has done porn in the past, but is primarily an escort now. She said she was amazed at how flaky and unprofessional many of her co-stars were. Late, hungover, high on dope, unable/unwilling to work because of physical/mental problems, etc.

Not necessarily a different breed in this respect as other folks from other walks of life, but just as apathetic. MfSD>>>>

"Men control the porn business, the male actors and producers control the money flow. The women that work in the industry are the bit players, they can be replaced at any time by a young, new faces. If you think being in that predicament is empowering, then go ahead and believe what you will."

I think escorting in many cases is much more empowering for women then porno. They're much more free as to who they see, the hours they work, their donation schedule, travel, etc. I've seen comaprisons of women doing porn work and escorting when in fact they are very dissimilar activities in a number of ways.

The woman that are running their own websites, controlling the content, distribution and other facets of their business are in a better position to call their own shots then some just arrived in Socal, midwestern grain fed cutey taking pop shots in the face on cue to pay her rent in Van Nuys. MfSD>>>>

We've started scheduling multiple guys, just in the hopes that one will show up.  If my wife would just remove the "don't screw the girls" restriction, we'd already have product for sale.