TER General Board

Yup!
souls_harbor 74 reads
posted

I just had CBJ for the first time last night, before that only BBBJ.   Yes, in fact, they do compare -- physical sensation-wise.   I can't speak to psychological because that will be different for every guy.

My advice would be to try it out and see for yourself.  If you already know your preference (from experience) then you know your preference.  

I'm thinking of requesting covered from now on because it feels just as good and it is safer.  Really a no brainer.  However, if she doesn't like the taste of rubber, that's sufficient excuse to avoid it.

Like most hobbyists, I have always thought of the CBJ as a poor second choice to a BBBJ. Well, today I was treated to a CBJ that was so good that it would have fooled me, had not see the hat on her tongue.

I guess the trick was to roll the condom on just the end of the tip, just enough to prevent contact with my fluids. I wonder if I should call it a CBBBJ?  

Feeling relaxed at the end of a "hard" day.  😎😎

Even when you know the condom is there.

After a date a good night kiss is better than nothing, but that isn't why you went on the date.

 
I don't object to anyone who wants to practice safe time.

I wouldn't go making up a bs acronym.

That the Cleveland Browns win the Super Bowl this year.

To me, CBJ will always stand for Columbus Blue Jackets, not covered blow jobs

souls_harbor74 reads

Coincidentally I had my first CBJ tonight.  As I suspected, it felt as good as BBBJ.  I may insist upon it in the future.  

I understand for some guys it is psychological, the thought of mouth on dick, so they accept no substitute.  But I guess I don't need that, just like covered FS feels just as good to me as BBFS (only had that with civies and not looking for it with providers.)

ROGM64 reads

Posted By: souls_harbor
Re: Me too
Coincidentally I had my first CBJ tonight.  As I suspected, it felt as good as BBBJ.  I may insist upon it in the future.    
   
 I understand for some guys it is psychological, the thought of mouth on dick, so they accept no substitute.  But I guess I don't need that, just like covered FS feels just as good to me as BBFS (only had that with civies and not looking for it with providers.)
You think BBFSCIP is safer with a non working girl than a provider? Really?

souls_harbor71 reads

I was recounting history rather than being prescriptive.

The difference between "skin on skin" vs "skin on latex" is night and day. and that goes for P/V, anal, and oral as well.  

 
I think some guys get so little action that they might actually prefer the reduced sensation they get by wearing a condom as they are able to last longer, but speaking for myself, there is simply no comparison between "bare" activities and "covered" I really don't want to die, or alternatively have my dick rot off, so I am not out there raw dogging hookers that I have known for all of five minutes, but to claim there is no difference in the sensation is ridiculous.

souls_harbor81 reads

"speaking for myself"  -- I think that covers this discussion for everyone.

I like CBJ and it didn't reduce the sensation (I've had BBBJ my entire life, so I know what they feel like.)  CBJ is a first for me and there really was no difference.   "Speaking for myself."

-- Modified on 7/21/2017 9:58:04 AM

So I suppose if you like CBJ, who am I to tell you otherwise.

 
I have had my share of both, and to me there in simply no comparison, it's like the difference between a peck on the lips and a DFK. Night and day for me.

To have preferred a cover.  If that were the case, then I'd probably want a cover as well.  Other than that reason, I don't understand why there would be a preference for a CBJ.  I've heard of a latex fetish, but I don't think that extends to CBJ's.

A covered blow job!!!   You don't see many of those around anymore.  You must feel sort of like an archeologist discovering a relic from the past.  You can add that to your vinyl record collection.

ATLDAWG79 reads

No Covered Blow Job can compare to a Bare Back Blow Job!   To think differently is total BS !!!

I am though glad that the reviewers "Cover" this important topic-because if in the process of reading a review or an ad that talks about a CBJ-I am no longer interested !    

Have a nice day !

souls_harbor75 reads

I just had CBJ for the first time last night, before that only BBBJ.   Yes, in fact, they do compare -- physical sensation-wise.   I can't speak to psychological because that will be different for every guy.

My advice would be to try it out and see for yourself.  If you already know your preference (from experience) then you know your preference.  

I'm thinking of requesting covered from now on because it feels just as good and it is safer.  Really a no brainer.  However, if she doesn't like the taste of rubber, that's sufficient excuse to avoid it.

It probably is going to be cbj unless you are going by price point.

I've never been surprised that a cbj was on the menu vs bbbj, disappointed maybe but not surprised.  

 
It's not like cbjs don't exist IRL, been getting them since. I want my post approved.

ATLDAWG74 reads

Those Starting to support the process of a Covered Blow Job will next bring demands for a natural, untamed, untrimmed Bush !

No I say-No  !

Bare Back Blow Jobs and Bare Pussy is the Only Way To Go !!!

Register Now!