Yes. It was messy and made me wish I'd brought a poncho along.

...that is a squirter. You don't have to "request" it. (Request it?! WTF?!) When you're with her it happens. You are correct. It's not urine. I find it Very Hot! In DATY I had to decide spit or swallow. I went for some of both. I just kept eating while it ran out of my mouth and some went down my throat. Gotta love it!!

As a civilian I have experienced a squirter about 3 times. one of which I dated for many years. But I have experienced 0 squirters with a provider and would love to find one that does not upsell it but rather let it just happen. This is a huge turn on for me and cannot wait to get my hands on one.

I've had two experiences.  One lady literally gushed during DATY and I couldn't swallow fast enough.  The second time I saw her I had a towel on the ready.  

The second experience, I had a finger in her vagina and her anus and when she climaxed she squirted on my chest.  She said it was one of the most intense orgasms she had ever experienced.  It was very hot.

It was not urine, had no urine smell.

It's better when it isn't my sheets and bedding getting drenched.

Definately time to get a hotel room, let them wonder.

Not a dude but I love squirters. This one chick I was going down on drenched my face as soon as I did the g-spot technique. Although I had to get my hair done afterwards, it was great.

it pretty much smells like what they've been drinking, or at least in this case it did: picked up a provider at the airport, she had a HUGE Starbucks coffee...a little while later we get to the hotel, shower, etc. and the fun begins.  Squirting mayhem began (which I enjoyed in previous visits with her) and it smelled like a 98.6 degree coffee was being poured on me.  Not really a turn-on.

On the other hand, I JUST got back from a session with a hot little things that squirted all over me, and it smelled/tasted great.

So there ya go.

There is one hot latina in Chicago who does so if you are good with your fingers or mouth

As a matter of fact, when I am really aroused, I couldn't pee even if I wanted to.  I have gone to the bathroom aroused and had to sit there for a few minutes before I could pee.

Pee is golden and gross.  Female ejaculation is clear and odorless.

I'm thinking that the majority of clients would want a Provider to squirt.
That being said, squirting for every client/appointment all day long and for several day does take put a strain on her body.
Dehydration is highly likely!
I will not allow myself to overly do it.......no sense in dehydrating myself and being left in a poor condition, miserable and unable to see clients due to not feeling 100%. Business decision.
Take her a case of bottled water and a prize....seems fair...hehe
"I know that  Mason Moore was advertising her skills as a squirter but you had to request that skill?  WTF!?"

even when I was a kid.  I do it even if I don't want to (and yes, there are times I would rather not - like in a car.)  It does run out after tooooo many orgasms, but then all I have to do is wait and hour or two (during which I'm likely to drink a Diet Coke) and it's back.

When I first started providing I did not advertise it, and I didn't realize that perhaps I should.  But then one day I had an unsuspecting guy DATY, and he about jumped through the ceiling when I gushed on him.  He completely freaked out - thought I peed on him.  I had to show him that it was colorless and odorless and nothing like pee before he would relax.  Ever since then I make sure everyone knows what to expect before we get started.  

But I will say, not everyone likes it.  It makes them uncomfortable, I think because they don't understand it.  And I do have quite a few clients who don't care about it either way - they like ME - my personality, my professionalism, etc.  One of my most regular regulars will not DATY with me, even though he DATY with other girls.  But everything else about me brings him back time and again.  So keeping that in mind, I try to focus ALL of my advertising on it.

Just the Facts Ma'am

My Ex was a female ejaculator, aka squirter, and for 14 years I experienced this rather erotic discharge. Following is a rather long, but interesting for those of us that enjoy the act, discussion of the subject.

Female ejaculation, which is usually defined as the expulsion of a significant amount of fluid around the time of orgasm—estimates range from, on average, 3 to 50 ml (about 10 teaspoons)—is a topic that was first described by scholars around 2000 years ago. In an extraordinary review article last year in Sexual Medicine History, urologist Joanna Korda and her colleagues combed through the translated texts of the ancient Eastern and Western literatures and plucked out multiple references that would appear to distinguish between common vaginal lubrication during intercourse and the rarer external ejaculation of sexual fluids. The 4th century Taoist text, "Secret Instructions Concerning the Jade Chamber," for example, written for the enterprising man in the art of satisfying a woman in bed, suggested that he decipher the following "five signs" of feminine arousal accordingly:

(1) "reddened face" = "she wants to make love with you"

(2) "breasts hard and nose perspiring" = "she wants you to insert your penis"

(3) "throat dry and saliva blocked" = "she is very stimulated and excited"

(4) "slippery vagina" = "she wants to have her orgasm soon"

(5) "the genitals transmit fluid" = "she has already been satisfied"

I wouldn’t recommend you implement these secret instructions today; citing number two in your defence that, say, some woman with a sweaty nose wanted you to insert your penis into her isn’t likely to hold up in a court of law. But the fact that this ancient text distinguishes between "slippery vagina" and "the genitals transmit fluid," reason Korda and her coauthors, means that the latter can "clearly be interpreted as female ejaculation [at] orgasm." In ancient India, the Kamasutra, which dates to 200-400 A.D., speaks of "female semen" that "falls continually." And in the West, even Aristotle had something to say about female discharge during sexual intercourse, which, he pointed out, "far exceeds" the seminal emission of the man. He also noted—and it’s tempting to speculate about just how he came to this conclusion—that female ejaculation tends to be "found in those who are fair-skinned and of a feminine type generally, but not in those who are dark and of masculine appearance."

It wasn’t until the latter half of the 17th century, however, that the first truly scientific account of female ejaculation would be presented, this by a Dutch gynecologist named Reinjier De Graaf (pictured), precisely distinguishing between vaginal lubrication, which facilitates intercourse, and female ejaculation, which is tantamount to seminal emission. "This liquid was clearly not designed by Nature to moisten the urethra (as some people think)," wrote De Graaf, describing the "pituito-serous juice" sometimes excreted around the time of female orgasm. "The ducts [from which they arise] are so placed at the outlet of the urethra that the liquid does not touch it as it rushes out."

Fast-forward to 1952, past the historical hordes of women secretly ejaculating in mass confusion, and we arrive at the offices of German-born gynecologist Ernest Gräfenberg, who, while the contributions of De Graaf and others are often overlooked, is credited with "discovering" an erotic zone on the anterior wall of the vagina running along the course of the urethra. Ernest, in other words, is the one who first christened your "G-spot" with his article, "The Role of Urethra in Female Orgasm." In their review of his discovery, Korda and her colleagues report how Gräfenberg observed masturbating women expelling fluids from their urethra with orgasm "in gushes." Since this never occurred at the beginning of sexual stimulation, but rather only at the acme of orgasm, the physician concluded that its purpose was more for pleasure than for lubrication. "In the cases observed," wrote Gräfenberg:


…the fluid was examined and it had no urinary character. I am inclined to believe that ‘urine’ reported to be expelled during female orgasm is not urine, but only secretions of the intraurethral glands correlated with the erotogenic zone along the urethra in the anterior vaginal wall.

It wasn’t until 1982, in fact, that female ejaculate was first chemically analyzed. If it’s not urine, and it’s not semen, then what, exactly, is it? After all, according to an interview study (pdf) published by Amy Gilliland of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, most female ejaculators report "copious" amounts of fluid being released around the time of orgasm, enough to "soak the bed" or "spray the wall" or have their partner scream in terror and misunderstanding. So it’s rather odd that we still don’t have a name for this substance that 40 percent of women report having produced liberally at least once in their lives.

Nearly all studies have shown a chemical dissimilarity between urine and female ejaculate—in fact, there are commonalities with male seminal fluid. A small portion of semen contains sperm cells, the rest is a batter of psychotropic concoctions. Yet for many women, urine isn’t entirely absent from the emission, either. Most female ejaculators, left to their own devices and without access to scientific information, describe their own explorations of the mysterious material. Some describe it as thick and viscous, or salty, others as watery and odorless. "No research has been done in this area for over 20 years," laments Gilliland, "and we still do not have an answer satisfying to most sexologists as to what female ejaculate fluid is or where it is manufactured."

Part of the trouble in investigating the phenomenon under properly controlled scientific conditions, however, is the fact that it doesn’t particularly lend itself to laboratory investigations. Many women report needing to be intensely aroused, as well as very relaxed, to ejaculate at orgasm. So, although the clearest picture of what’s happening down there would come from rigorous methodological studies, the trouble is that subjecting self-reported female ejaculators to a barrage of invasive electromyographic laboratory techniques designed to stimulate their clitoris and evoke ejaculation kind of kills the mood.

This is something that a team of Egyptian researchers learned the hard way recently. After attaching multiple electrodes to the genitals of 38 healthy young women, as well as using vaginal and uterine balloons to measure pressure, and then stimulating the women to orgasm using electrovibration, they didn’t find a drop of ejaculate, only vaginal lubrication. They could only surmise that foreplay might have done the trick. By contrast, a team of Czechs did manage to evoke "female urethral expulsions" in 10 women under laboratory conditions back in 1988, but these women, unlike those in the more recent Egyptian study, had a self-reported history of frequent ejaculation.

The best understanding to date of female ejaculation comes from the reports of female ejaculators themselves, many who, sadly, are just as clueless as their partners who believe they’re making love to an inconveniently incontinent woman. But we do know from the chemical assays at least this: although it may have traces of urea, female ejaculate is not urine. Many of the women interviewed by Gilliland recounted that, after several humiliating episodes at this unexpected outburst of fluid, they’d since taken to voiding their bladders before having sex, yet still they ejaculated prodigiously.