... but these are established agencies, both Asian and Latina.
Is it just me who thinks it's a bad practice to say exactly which hotel, apartment bldg., house number, etc.? Some ads embed the info in their URL, and still other put it directly in the ad. Not that LE can't find out easily enough, including room number, but why broadcast it? It makes me uncomfortable...save it for the text message.
When I see them I automatically think newbie or cop.
... but these are established agencies, both Asian and Latina.
Insane!!
No reputable, well-reviewed Provider would
post in an ad, nor even on their Personal Website
their actual address!!
A general location of the city in which their locale is...
such as "I'm in the "Gaslamp District" of Downtown
San Diego, near 5th Avenue."
However, I don't even provide the exact address/location until
a few hours after my final "Confirmation" of our scheduled date.
I've learned this technique from Providers with 15+ years in the biz.
Just to be extra-vigilant, I've a gated location, so I don't ever offer the
gate code nor the Loft # until they've arrived to the gate.
If someone pressures me to offer my address a day in advance
"for traffic planning purposes"...
Unless they are well-referenced from Providers whom I personally know,
I will then cancel the date, as this too is a huge "red flag".
However, none of the aforementioned is ever procured until I diligently
verify Reputable Provider References. 
The only thing left to know with these ads is the room number, which is provided, as usual, when you get there. Even in a hotel with lots of rooms, it can be a problem. One agency that provides Latina talent has recently submitted five ads for providers, all at the same (well positioned) hotel! If nothing else, my thought is that the hotel is going to crack down. Including those five ads, I have recently visited two other women there, so I know of seven women there. It's a veritable brothel, lol. It puts them all at risk of losing a good resource: decent hotel, prime location.
It is generally sufficient to give a nearby known intersection or other landmark. That is sufficient for traffic planning.
List my exact location.. i would think that has to be scary for someone already there, one strict rule, is even if you know my address, you follow my rules...
I agree. Why draw unnecessary attention? Seeing it makes me on edge going to that location to see anybody, even more so to see whomever put that info in their ad.
I just came upon a lady here in DC that's very close to me (about a mile away) who I find myself fascinated with. She has a few ads in different places and in one or two she lists an address. Looks to be a building with 4 apartments in it. She also has her face blurred in a few of the ads but un-blurred in others. Her various ads also list three different hourly rates (300, 400 and 500). Very strange.
She claims to be a 50 year old Venezuelan and she has an incredible body. She doesn't accept texts or emails only calls. No reviews that I can find.
I may reach out to her to get a feel for what's up but I am counting on not going ahead and seeing her. I can't see why anyone would give their actual address in an ad.
An "actual address" is probably not (I hope NOT!) her actual address!
.
I agree with Lester (above) that a general location is good enough for almost all purposes: a landmark or a street intersection.
.
IF there is no easy way for her to provide the general area for planning travel time, it might be easier for her to give a street address, "123 Escort Boulevard." That might also apply if she isn't a long time resident who knows the important landmarks ("That's a landmark that everybody knows? I thought it was just an ugly, run-down building!").
.
However, when you arrive, you get the details: "across the street from 123" or "two buildings down from 123" or the parking lot for 123 Escort Blvd is also the shared parking lot for 45 Provider Place, her actual hosting location.
------------123EscortBlvd------------------------------------------------------------------
................[parking lot]
-------------45ProviderPl------------------
.
Yes, I'd be concerned about ads with real, actual addresses but I'd try to determine if it was being used as a general locator or is her actual location.
In each case, the only thing missing is the room/apt number. In one instance, the street address was off by one in the URL, which they corrected in the body of the ad!
What pisses me off about it is that they may as well put a red light in the window. One of my regulars is at the hotel where now six separate ads have the street address (and a couple the name) of the hotel in the ad's banner. WTF. It makes me uncomfortable visiting her. At the very least, as I said before, it could put the hotel on notice to "clean things up" and they'll all lose a good spot.
My reply was about residential settings: apartment buildings or houses. Long ago, I lived in a 3-story multi-unit apartment complex. I'd get home late at night and there was often someone parked in my space and I complained to the landlord. It turns out that one of the apartments a few entrances down from me was the workplace of a couple of Providers (all before TER). They didn't live there, that's where they conducted business. They told their guests to park anywhere in the lot. I saw them coming and going during the day every now and then ... 20s, slender, but not all that attractive in their civvies. I never would have guessed! THEY could have put MY ("123") address / unit number in their ads and then told their guests that they are actually a few doors down ("133").
.
NAMING specific hotels IN AN AD does sound crazy. Sometimes, a hostess will give the name of a specific hotel to a client via email or text. Even then, when there are clusters of hotels (as found in many cities), she might give you final directions to the hotel next door or across the street. ("I'm here at the Sheraton, right on time!" "Great! I'm in the Marriot across the street, room 4321. Come on up. See you in 5 minutes!")
In each case, the only thing missing is the room/apt number. In one instance, the street address was off by one in the URL, which they corrected in the body of the ad!
What pisses me off about it is that they may as well put a red light in the window. One of my regulars is at the hotel where now six separate ads have the street address (and a couple the name) of the hotel in the ad's banner. WTF. It makes me uncomfortable visiting her. At the very least, as I said before, it could put the hotel on notice to "clean things up" and they'll all lose a good spot.
It doesn't reflect well on TER where the reviews are supposed to be works of fiction for the enjoyment of the reader. Having an exact address makes it a little too "real."
TER doesn't study the ads all that closely, but if someone reports that a provider's exact address is in her ad, TER will pull the ad.
You know, I should have been clear about this from the start: all the ads I've seen with the street addresses and, in some cases, the names of the hotels, are on bedpage. It was always a sporadic problem, but it's extensive in the past couple weeks. Bedpage seems to be a very poorly run operation, but it's more useful that a lot of opinionated hobbyists here who don't use it realize.
Giving out the address to a Motel that you are staying at can be bad. And what I mean by that is......if a Provider us putting it in an her online AD (Like This Site) then yes that's asking for trouble to knock at your door. But if the provider & hobbyist have been talking for awhile & she gave him the address, then She'll be fine to an extent.
There have been a few times when I read a review on this esteemed website, and I see enough detail that if I’m local and know a few things I can identify the precise location of the dalliance (and presume it’s a “permanent” location, not a temporary location like a hotel). I don’t think the reviewer was trying to do wrong, but he just didn’t know that the detail gave it away to a local.
What’s the protocol? Should I message the site to say they may want to redact some details to protect the provider? Leave it alone?