He said they are disloyal to Israel if they vote for Dems, because the Dems refuse to condemn anti-Semitism. Dems have become the Jew-haters and you have been no exception on the boards. Your support of the "Squad" proves it.
your fun question of the day.
This is an ad. I do like her sign-off though.
putz chimes in. Check all of her other posts, especially LA. She is the one who has given us humorous and erotic word games for many years. I don' disagree that this also gets her name in the spotlight, but I think she just forgot this time.
I knew some asshole would whine about this, I honestly never expected it to be you. Lighten the fuck up, it's a fuck board that is dying, I think she should be applauded for trying to breath some life into this board. Personally I am sick of this board simply being a "spill over" for the P&R board, where most of the posts are by you, LTM and IMP bashing the President and CDL and I calling you out for it. We already have one board where ALL the conversation is about Trump, do we REALLY need another?
And, of course, you're WRONG. I don't give a shit if Ashley puts up an ad. I just would have preferred one that was more creative, as she usually does, instead of this blatant one. But leave it to The Stupid Twins not to be able to tell the difference.
Besides, what do you care? The whole thread is still up. So now you both can go back to the P&R Board and your usual practice of lying, distorting and warping reality.
Hopefully this just proves that maybe admin is hoping that some real conversation will return to this board and is doing their best not to stifle anything that even looks like "on topic" conversation. IOW talking about pussy instead of the constant Trump bashing that has spilled over onto this board, mainly by your idiot BFF.
You're a pussy.
Happy now?
You wouldn't happen to be earlthepearl who was also phislammjamma who we're kicked off and b'lstd from several korgs cause you write just like him.
What's a "korg," Einstein? Looks like you just made it The Stupid Triplets. You write like a retarded person.
I don't have to look it up. Silky is referring to K-org, or Kgirl Org. In other words, a Korean escort agency, to put it in terms you will probably understand. The other Korg is an early form of keyboard synthesizer from the 70's. I'm sure GaG knew what it meant, as well. Do you see the irony in calling us the "Stupid Triplets" when YOU are the only one that didn't know what it meant?
And you brag here about your knowledge of pussy. When was the last time you had any? Lol
Of course, being a K-Girl devotee from LA you know what a K-Org is but I'll bet you had to google to find out about Korg synthesizers. Also, how do YOU know that I'm "the only one that didn't know what it meant?" Another stretch by you. Last, the poster in question butchered the language in the REST of his post so my appointing him one of The Stupid Triplets stands. As does your membership considering the weak effort you just put up.
and the Korean one is not among them.
you're talking to a guy who last week picked the Dictionary of Slang as his source instead of the UD, which presumably he'd never heard of before.
CDL, do you realize you've just been schooled on hipness by the heretofore least hip poster on TER? The one a friend of some of us here refers to as Mr. Peepers?
How low can you go? rofl
-- Modified on 8/5/2019 7:23:41 PM
-- Modified on 8/5/2019 7:25:28 PM
I don't have to look it up. Silky is referring to K-org, or Kgirl Org.
.
coeur-de-lion is understandably CDL, Cdl, CdL. GaGambler is understandably GaG or GaGa. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is NATO, not Nato, not nato.
.
Silkstalkings wrote, "... who we're kicked off and b'lstd from several korgs cause you ...". Several typos but mostly understandable. "we're" = were, "b'lstd" = blacklisted, "cause" = 'cause or because. I had no idea what "korg" was supposed to be. I thought it might be a really, really bad typo and stopped trying to figure it out after "covfefe" and another 3 seconds. If SS had written "Korg" instead of "korg" (it still could have been a typo) but at least I am thinking that K could be from a proper noun .... Korea! K-org, K-Org or KOrg as a short form is better. And so on.
-- Modified on 8/6/2019 1:22:08 AM
anal-retentive for most people here. In this age of screen names and internet where many proper nouns are not capitalized (and many millennials that NEVER use capital letters), you must often look to the usage and content of the writing to determine what someone is saying when they abbreviate something, with or without capitals. As is my practice, I was answering off the top of my head, but I took into account that Silky is a high-volume, well-respected LA Kgirl aficionado, so there was no doubt in my mind that he was referring to what the Kgirl scene calls korgs, short for Kgirl Orgs.
I threw in the other one because I had some dealings with Korg back in the late 70's when I was just starting out in business, and I hadn't seem the name in quite a while. Interestingly, AFTER I posted, I looked them up and they are still in business, and still making music synthesizers. This was just self-indulgent, and I knew Silky was talking about Kgirls. I hope I get iMpPoStEr the way you want it. Lol
but for anybody with so much as room temperature IQ, it was pretty fucking easy to figure out. It took me all of about five seconds to put it into context and figure out what he was talking about. Maybe it is true that liberalism will rot your brain. The two libs couldn't figure it out, but the two conservatives had no problem at all understanding what he meant.
CDL is a fellow LA-ian and knows the lay of the land and the local lingo. GaG is a widely experienced monger and put "korg" into the context of that experience. I (and Jake) are East Coasters (NYC) and it did not look or sound familiar even though I, for one, am very familiar with the K-world in NYC. If you want to chalk it up to politics, we can do that, too. Three cons think alike but are not well in touch with those who do not share all of their views. It is not an IQ issue. It is a "like-mindedness" issue.
.
The lesson is, if you want to communicate your ideas and opinions to others, especially those that might not share your views and might not be sympathetic to those views at first, you should try to use clearer, more precise language. And you should not ridicule them, debase them, and bully them just because they ask for a clarification.
but for anybody with so much as room temperature IQ, it was pretty fucking easy to figure out. It took me all of about five seconds to put it into context and figure out what he was talking about. Maybe it is true that liberalism will rot your brain. The two libs couldn't figure it out, but the two conservatives had no problem at all understanding what he meant.
Well said. I wish you would send that along to AOC and the squad, and to some of the Dems running for President that are attempting to silence opposing speech. They could use a "lesson" like this.
First, I'd like to point out that this is the General board, not P&R. GaG made a pejorative comment about the IQs of conservatives vs liberals. I addressed that by suggesting it was more an issue of "like-mindedness" rather than intelligence or anything specifically political that made it easier to understand each other.
.
CDL then brought The Squad and AOC into the thread. CDL brought up silencing opposing speech.(???) My last sentence was about "you should not ridicule them, debase them, and bully them just because they ask for a clarification." If anything, that seems to be POTUS, day after day, dismissing Qs and requests for explanations or further comments with "Fake news!" and "You are a terrible, rude person." or "Sit down!" (to reporters who asked a Q). Do not bring up "Russia" or you'll be banned from the WH news pool. And so on.
.
I am replying below, but suggest that further discussion (or the whole topic) be taken to P&R.
Well said. I wish you would send that along to AOC and the squad, and to some of the Dems running for President that are attempting to silence opposing speech. They could use a "lesson" like this.
The message was directed at the contributors to this thread who seemed to feel that anyone who can't mind meld with them and understand their less than clear posts are somehow inferior intellectually and should be demeaned.
.
When posting to the TER boards, your audience is the diverse readership: a mixture of all political stripes, all geographical areas (including Europe), all degrees of experience (Newbie to Expert), and so on. When posting to the TER boards, try to speak to everyone here ... or at least answer their Qs if they ask for clarification.
.
When speaking at a real estate seminar for experts, you speak to them at their level. When speaking to oil investment newbies, you speak to them at their newbie level, not your highest expert level. When speaking at a political rally of supporters, those supporters probably know your policy positions and don't need as much detail to get riled up as an uninformed newbie or an opponent in the audience. When speaking a political event that is supposed to bipartisan (e.g., a memorial service for victims of terrorism), the rhetoric is USUALLY but not always toned down and less inflammatory. You will give different answers during an interview with Forbes than when being interviewed by The Weekly Reader (grade school K-6 news magazine)
.
One AOC example comes to mind: When campaigning, she was grilled about how she would pay for Medicare-for-All. She gave a terse answer: People would "just pay for it." and threw in "No one asks how we're going to pay for the Space Force." If you knew the details of the various Medicare-for-All proposals, you knew what she meant. If you did not, you called her crazy. Basically: "We" currently spend around $4 T per year on health care. No one asks where that $4 T comes from because it's "just" there. It comes from premiums paid for insurance, insurance payouts, government, out of pocket payments, bankruptcy, etc.. "You just pay for it!" meant you collect the SAME money differently, from taxes and fees instead of premiums, and disburse it from Medicare.
.
Current method: collect ~$5.5 T coming IN, insurers take 25 - 30% off the top (a lot for CEO salaries and bonuses), and pay out the remaining $4 T to doctors, hospitals, et al.. See? "We just pay for it!" M-for-A method: collect ~$4.4 T in taxes and fees, gov spends around 10% on admin, pays out $4 T for health services.
.
AOC SHOULD HAVE EXPLAINED IT BETTER TO THAT AUDIENCE / INTERVIEWER and been less dismissive. She and her supporters thought it was obvious but she was not being interviewed by her supporters. She is learning to explain things better de novo and to clarify things, if necessary, after the original speech or interview.
.
Of course, AOC could have just told the interviewer, "Mexico will pay!" and then there would have been no controversy.
Just How Much is TER paying you per word again?
If you will reread this thread it was JAKE who started in with the name calling, not me or CDL. If you want like to lecture someone about being rude etc, Please start with Jake, not me.
All I said was that Ashley's post was an ad. I didn't call her, or anyone, a name. Then you immediately called me a "fucking putz" and an "asshole." Now here's some advice: if you're going to LIE -- which you do all the time -- at least TRY not to make it so obvious.
I was talking about politicization (P&R) of this thread on the General board. From the OP, working my way down, in chronological order. After a couple of no-name-calling posts:
1. CDL called Jake a putz. Rude? Funny name-calling?
2. GaG repeats "putz" and adds "asshole." (GaG mentions P&R and Trump but suggesting that we avoid those issues on General. Borderline P&R, but I give it a pass.) Rude? Funny name-calling?
3. Jake then retaliates with "Stupid Twins." Rude? Funny name-calling?
All of that is just the usual name-calling that we have here.
4. THEN GaG introduced a more political slant into the thread, WHICH IS THE P&R DIGRESSION I WAS REFERRING TO, when GaG talks about the intelligence of cons vs libs.
5. CDL then adds The Squad and AOC to the topic in a reply to my comment about communicating ideas.
And there's a certain someone of Chinese extraction (no name-calling) who is lying like a house afire. Is this new? NOPE. It's just more blatant of late.
Do you really expect the government to manage health care responsibly? Social Security was supposed to be a segregated fund, invested in bonds or other interest-bearing instruments, but early on, the pols started dipping into it to fund other things. It was never segregated and never invested for growth. It just went into the general fund. In a civil context, the way they managed this pool would be called conversion, an actionable tort with the possibility of punitive damages for the victim. In a criminal context, its called embezzlement, which I'm sure needs no further explanation. The last thing I want is for any more of my money to go into government-run healthcare.
I hope you also understand that Medicare has a deductive at the beginning of the year, and a 20% co-pay that the patient is responsible for. On a $100,000 triple bypass, that's $20,000. Most private insurance either has NO copay or a very small one of 2-4%. Even a major medical plan night have a $5000 annual deductible, but that's a far cry from $20,000.
CDL, in IMP I think I have met my very first open supporter of BEG who was older than 20 something.
Most adults, especially the ones that actually listens to the incredibly dumb shit that comes out of her mouth try to put as much distance between themselves and her ideas as humanly possible without actually switching parties. lol Well everyone, but the 20 or so morons running for POTUS on the Dim side of course, but in an era where CrazySleepyUncleJoe is considered "moderate" I guess that really should come as no surprise.
I can't wait for IMP to come out and announce his support for Pocahontas next, lmao
Here is my prediction for Medicare for all in the unlikely event it ever passes. EVERYONE will have their taxes double in order to pay for it and then we will be "allowed" to buy private insurance to cover the 20% copay, but the cost of covering that 20% will quickly equal what we are now paying for 100% coverage today. At the end of the day we will all be paying twice as much in taxes, the Federal Government will be controlling a percentage approaching 50% of our total economy and we'll still be paying just as much for insurance as we are today.
One of the MORE likely scenarios if M-4-All is passed. We will be on it anyway at some point due to age, but I do not welcome the day that government tells me what treatment is "approved" and what's not. I've had to monitor my aged father's Medicare account for some years and there are many more limitations on what is covered than most people think. Just because a doctor says you need a test, Medicare still might not pay for it, and the burden falls on the patient. Even though there is an appeal process, the government bureaucrats still get the last word.
One of the MORE likely scenarios if M-4-All is passed. We will be on it anyway at some point due to age, but I do not welcome the day that government tells me what treatment is "approved" and what's not. I've had to monitor my aged father's Medicare account for some years and there are many more limitations on what is covered than most people think. Just because a doctor says you need a test, Medicare still might not pay for it, and the burden falls on the patient. Even though there is an appeal process, the government bureaucrats still get the last word.
any Dem say that under M-4-all, people could completely "opt-out" of the higher taxes collected to pay for government insurance, so those people that keep their private plan would be paying twice for the same coverage. Its just a Lib government money-grab. Just like Obama's famous line, "If you like your doctor, you can keep him." That turned out to be a load of shit. If they do M-4-all, Americans will be longing for the good old days when they were getting a lesser screwing from Obamacare.
Which means M-4-all will DOUBLE the national budget requiring taxes to be doubled to pay it meaning different things for different people.
For somebody like lets say LTM who makes no money and therefore pays no taxes this must sound like a great deal, but then someone on the bottom of the food chain doesn't pay for health care currently, so there really is no effect on someone at the very bottom of society.
But what about the rest of us, are we REALLY willing to pay twice as much in taxes for the promise of "free" health care that probably won't be free at all, and how about the people who presently already pay 50% of their income in taxes, are you going to double their taxes so that they end up giving ALL their money to the government? and if not "someone" else has to make up that slack for the country not to go bankrupt. Since we can't double the tax on "everyone" that means some people are going to see their taxes more than double, and then we are just around the corner from total Socialism where the Government takes ALL of EVERYONE's money and the only wealthy people we'll have left are a bunch of crooked politicians, kind of like Cuba or Venezuela
Nationalized medicine is power (money) grab for the government. I personally thought it was unconstitutional to force people to have health insurance, but the supreme court thought otherwise.
I have insurance and don't even know how to use it. I will start seeing the doc at least every year. I ended up paying around $90/mo. Is it a good price? If the gov says it's ok not to have. Should I get rid of it and use it for cheap escorts? LOL
a ninety dollar escort is you don't have to worry about them cutting up the skin on your dick with their teeth. They don't have any.
some maybe crooked or rotten. Some might still be young and their teeth still new and ok. They brush their teeth but with time they might need service but they don't have the money to and they go bad and stay bad. Thank you I like it when people talk reality and simplicity of the real world as it is. Whatever the topic might be.
don't offer GFE, but who wants to DFK rotten teeth anyway, right?
At $90 they are still likely to have teeth, and some very rotten, nasty and rather sharp teeth at that. Do you really want "pointy" teeth anywhere near your dick?
My advice for the bottom feeders is to wait until their rates have fallen to about $40, by then all those rotten teeth will have fallen out and you can get a nice "gum job", if you can stand the smell of course. lol
I don't see rates falling to $40 unless they are the ones walking the streets and being somewhere, some how.
There are $65+ ones out there. But I'm not saying nothing... and who you calling bottom feeder? I'm not a top feed but I hover over the bottom feeders, one step above. You guys up there, you enjoy your GFE which I can't go for. It's too fake for me. I like the reality of the real deal. "Shut up and give me my money", she said. Ok see you next time I said.
Wait. Funny thing... many of these girls don't suck or kiss. So do suck with condom. But most never kiss. I don't care I never understood kissing ... or dancing and some other things.
In your case, you have no further to look than our local soup kitchen denizen to look down on. Just remember, no matter how bad you think your life sucks at times, you'll always be better off, not to mention you'll always be a better person than him.
Now doesn't that make you feel better about life? I am sure that $65 pussy is better than no pussy at all, and "no pussy at all" is what our resident mooch has been living on for about a decade it appears. Or maybe he just doesn't like pussy? Who are we to judge, right?
But just remember if you don't want your dick scraped or cut by a too toothy BJ, wait until ALL their teeth fall out lest you get a nasty wound on your dick from a "snaggletoothed" ho. A gum job never hurt anyone. lol
How many people actually voted for BEG? a few thousand.
There are a LOT of people who vocally support the President, I don't think I have met an actual supporter of BEG in person, or even met anyone who has even TRIED to defend her ridiculous ideas. Keep in mind her claim to fame was the "Green New Deal" Do you recall how many Senators voted FOR it when McConnell brought it up for a vote? ZERO, not a single fucking vote, Not even one Democrat was willing to go on record as voting for it. Now THAT means an idea is truly dumb when you can't get even a single vote from your own party.
So let me ask you Imp, are you willing to go on record as someone who supports AOC???
You remind me of a social butterfly all talk and No action when it comes to seeing girls in this hobby!
I bet you're that guy that just window shops.
And has no game. None. I'm so terribly sorry I've upset you.
I bet you're that guy with a clit-dick.
can or do we be naughty?
2. Why stop posting on your regional boards and start posting on the general board?
lick lick
My answers:
1. by asking dumb questions
2. Because my local (L.A.) board is dead.
... and get Naughty!
have a good day everyone! It's been a while, stopping by to say hello!
The most recent replies are indented so far that they are only one or two characters wide. It is hard to read:
Y
o
u
a
r
e
a
n
i
d
i
o
t
.
Either move comments back out to an earlier indent level or start a NEW topic on General or P&R.
I agree that some of the branches on this thread are in serious danger of "falling off the right side of the page"
Follow up that lick lick with a rub rub? 👯
Let's have some FUN!