People aren't reading reviews to read how you busted a nut inside a lady on a unremarkable session. That's why "penthouse" reviews generally aren't that helpful

 
They are reading the reviews to get some evaluation of the girl.

I fail to see how it's wasting someone's time. People shop around and read reviews to see how well others rate the provider and the experience. A meh experience is just as informative as any other experience.

The reason I said what I said in the title is that there is a general lack of average or below average session reviews. Even if it's bad reviews, it's incredibly polarized range. There are a lot sessions/providers that are just average. Generally people don't want to see average if there are other alternatives, but understanding WHY someone else rated them average goes a looong way.

For everybody’s sake!  The Gentlemen should know whether these ladies are good times or bad times…real or fake…legit or scammers!  Unless the Provider specifically requests no reviews, A good review will reward the good providers with a growing following, consistent bookings, and New Friends

1. She requests one

 
2. She is new and has none, or few (provided she is OK with it)

 
3. If it is a bad session (regardless of her preference)

 
4. If I think it will add something new to existing reviews (if she is OK with it).

 
In general, I respect a Lady's preferences in regards to reviews. If she doesn't have them or want them , I don't write one.

when I have something useful to say. If a provider was recently reviewed, has a substantial review history, and my experience was similar to that of other reviewers, I don’t see the need for a “Me too!” review. I’ll review if there’s no recent reviews, or there’s some aspect of my experience that isn’t covered by existing reviews (and it’s not something the provider wants to keep off the record), or my experience was significantly better or worse than what’s in existing reviews.

 
And if I plan on writing a review, I’ll ask the provider if it’s ok with her—UNLESS there’s a situation others need to be aware of such as a rip-off or unsafe behavior.  There’s been cases when I wanted to write a positive review, but the provider didn’t want new reviews at that time.

I almost always review the first time I see a lady to share my experience. I rarely review second or subsequent sessions unless something was drastically different, whether good or bad.

for the first time, but I don't see a need to review them again unless they have improved, declined, or changed their menu from the last time I saw them.  Out of 380 reviews here, there are only about a dozen that I have reviewed more than once, and I repeat at least once with about 70-80 percent of the ladies I see, so a second review is relatively rare in the scheme of things for me.  I think your first impression with a new girl is important to share in a review because that's the same circumstance other mongers are facing who are contemplating seeing her.  

it wasn't a good experience but not the provider's fault. Earlier this year I saw a provider who's energy really didn't work for me. However, I read her stellar reviews and should've known from those she wasn't gonna be my cup of tea. She performed exactly as her reviews said she would and it just didn't get me going. Would've been dishonest to write a good review, and unfair to write her a bad one.

...reviews are more important than ever, at least for the gals charging $500 and more an hour.

I am semi retired and not rolling in the dough.  Housing crises in 2008 did me no favors.  

Given this situation, before I shell out $500 plus per hour the lady better be fantastic.  Risk/Reward ratio has going higher on the Risk as prices have gone up.

That is no one's fault, it's just the way things are.

 
As long as the gal did all she could and should do, and did it well, then a good review is her due.

 
I don't think it is being dishonest because another guy might come along who clicks with her, and why should he be denied a good review that will lead him to her?

 
That's my take on it.

... I've done very little in the hobby although I intend that to change very soon. Pre-COVID, I always reviewed the women I met if they were good to excellent. I only reviewed negative experiences if they were so heinous I wanted to warn others off. DIdn't review a woman if she was just so-so as everybody has a bad day now and then and she might perform much better for a different guy.

I only review when it's a good time.  if it's a ok or bad time I don't

Unless a girl explicitly asks not to be reviewed, I review.  I think a community like TER only works if people share their experiences.   It's been disappointing lately because it seems like 90% of the ladies advertising on EROS, Tryst and others are unreviewed, which makes it very difficult to decide to spend hundreds of dollars on a visit.   I think it has to do with a large number of ladies entering the industry due to the pandemic, but it also seems that guys are less active on the boards and therefore reviewing less.    

So I try to do my part and give an honest appraisal of the visit.   I may not be the most descriptive or imaginative writer, but when you read my reviews, you'll be able to tell if the lady is legit and if she looks like her photos, which I think is 90% of what people want to know from a review.   The rest is subjective and YMMV, but hopefully if more people reviewed, it would be pretty easy to detect trends and outliers.  

... if she is ok with being reviewed.  It's basic respect. But if the date turned into a train wreck, then I feel the obligation to warn my fellow hobbyist.