When I'm traveling from out of town, if a provider demands to see my full travel itinerary, as well as emails from work that prove that the trip was indeed booked and approved when I said it was ...  expecting me to send work emails from my company's servers to a hooker's email address mind you ... has the provider taken the whole "screening for safety" thing a little far?

Its her business and she can run it how she pleases.

Did someone actually ask for all of that?

When I want to see a new girl, I just pre-screen on P411.  The answer that always come back is: "what date/time would you like Honey?"

for me to send her a photo of myself about 4 hours before our appointment.  I had contacted her about a week earlier, sent her all my references and she agreed to everything, only to ask for my photo a 4 hours before we were scheduled to meet.  I said no, and she went ape shit on me, calling me a time waster and threatening to black list me if I ever called her again.

But it's her business. Most I've given which I didn't think was necessary was name an company. She still wouldn't see me. Move on.

-

between my white lists and p411 ok's i haven't had to send a referral info for quite a while.

... and every time I ask if using a verification would help. The answer is no.

That's what I thought too and for the most part its been true.  However I was in NYC a few months back and I contacted a highly rated provider via P411.  Unfortunately, the response I got back was not the usual, "I'd love to see you, etc..." instead  I was told by her asst that I would also need to provide my full name, employment info , etc...  so that they could run an Intellius background check on me.  When I questioned why this was necessary, given all many recent references/OK's, the response was that she had heard that some bad clients had bought off ladies to give them OK's.   I could believe that it might be possible to fake 1 or 2 OKs somehow, but in this case it was frankly just a ridiculous idea.   Needless to say we had different opinions on what reasonable screening should and should not entail.   Fortunately, NYC is a big place with many lovely women and the next person I contacted responded with the standard "love to, just tell me when and how long"

that's too bad, i can't imagine, unless you have a terrible reputation under your dating handle.

Maybe I'm naive but I think standard basic screening should be enough. If you're so paranoid that you need a guys inside leg measurement and family tree before you'll see him then maybe it's time to look for alternative work. Surely there are plenty of the usual screening methods available?

Its you? Just curious.