Write Review
1,983,309 Total Reviews 4,148 New Reviews
10,973 Users Online

TER General Board

Yeah, whats the deal with her? Seems a bit
NewEnglandGangsta 2222 reads
posted
1 / 23
Beauty...

times PERFORMANCE times BRAIN equals a CONSTANT?  

Your taughts, if any?

WickedBrut 27 Reviews 533 reads
posted
2 / 23
Those three could be used to triangulate a sensible perseption.

Physical beauty, a sensual and spirited performance by an intelligent, knowledgeable woman I would guess ought to result in a highly enjoyable session.

That said, it still doesn't mean she's going to rcck your world. That depends on a lot of other things including your willingness to have your world rocked and whether or not she's in the mood to give a damn.
Posted By: NewEnglandGangsta
times PERFORMANCE times BRAIN equals a CONSTANT?  
   
 Your taughts, if any?

Crazy Diamond 12 Reviews 563 reads
posted
3 / 23
Everybody's beautiful, in their own way...

There's no way to apply or develop a mathematical constant, and you will be disappointed if you try.  We humans are too complex for that...

HandleWithCare 492 reads
posted
4 / 23
Those are all important factors. But there's one more IMO.

I'm not sure how to label it. SOUL perhaps, or maybe HEART. Whatever it's called, I think it's what separates the very good providers from the great ones.  

And as was already said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's external beauty. And there's inner beauty. That's where the SOUL/HEART factor comes in.

As for an equation--it's difficult if not impossible to use math to quantify a person. I save math for other things, such as calculating my hobbying budget.

Pazuzu_Jones 7 Reviews 502 reads
posted
5 / 23
My calculator said...


END OF MESSAGE

inicky46 61 Reviews 468 reads
posted
6 / 23
I dunno about beauty. I just like the gal who recently has been advertising herself as

"Three Hole Sally.

NewEnglandGangsta 457 reads
posted
7 / 23
Isn't everyone smart in zeir own way too?

One comes at zee expense of zee others. Beauty times brain times performance = a constan

NewEnglandGangsta 328 reads
posted
8 / 23
Z question was different

It's a discussion about beauty, performance, brains all coming at zee expense of zee other characteristics.

numpty88 14 Reviews 434 reads
posted
9 / 23
Constants don't change over time, nor if the unexpected happens.

Given your scenario of:
(Beauty x Performance x Brains) = Constant
Then as one degrades the others must increase in regards to just one person.  If to you long hair is an element of beauty and someone you like shaves her head, does she instantly gain Performance or Brains?

If you're saying the Constant is a fixed value regardless of who is involved, then between two people of equal Beauty and equal Performance, they both have to be equally Brainy.  Real life experience is laughing so hard that one it's shooting a drink out of its nose.

Math likes rigid logic.  People are squishy and don't fit into rigid boxes, even accounting for the bondage folks.

Given the above, in my opinion the theory is not valid.

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 501 reads
posted
10 / 23
huh

DIALOGUE minus a BRAIN equals an ASSHOLE..

Posted By: NewEnglandGangsta
times PERFORMANCE times BRAIN equals a CONSTANT?  
   
 Your taughts, if any?

JohnyComeAlready 426 reads
posted
11 / 23
IDK? Crampsta, never gave that much thought.

Beauty - does not matter unless I want to create a pretty son. Not relevant in pfp.

 
Performance - that's important.

 
Brain - I like smart women, pfp isn't the go to medium to find one.

 

 
Were you looking for a numerical response to your equation?

JohnyComeAlready 452 reads
posted
12 / 23
What are you saying?...

Dumb girls with nothing to say like anal

Posted By: macdaddy1944
DIALOGUE minus a BRAIN equals an ASSHOLE..  
   
Posted By: NewEnglandGangsta
times PERFORMANCE times BRAIN equals a CONSTANT?    
     
  Your taughts, if any?

NewEnglandGangsta 384 reads
posted
13 / 23
LOL!! - e-


END OF MESSAGE

mrfisher 112 Reviews 502 reads
posted
14 / 23
Certainly not a constant, a few moment's reflection tells me that....

I would offer however that the product of those three (Accepting the argument for now that they can be intelligently quantified, and that's a stretch.) would give a range of numbers which, when plotted against the population would produce a bell curve not dissimilar to that used to express IQ ranges in the general population.

In sum:  There is a small quantity of gals (and for that matter, guys) at the extremes, and a large body in the middle, which is just what anyone would expect in a large segment looking at any particular set of attributes.

Fridays117 27 Reviews 500 reads
posted
15 / 23
Yeah, whats the deal with her? Seems a bit

Blatant advertising specifics the way she does.  On LI no less.  Recipe for trouble.  Gotta love the matter of factness of the ad though.

Fridays117 27 Reviews 520 reads
posted
16 / 23
The only constant

Is that you will pay for beauty and performance but intelligence is what keeps you coming back for more.  Or if not intelligence, then the wisdom to know that performance must increase to keep clients as beauty fades.  Since beauty is subjective the whole idea of a constant is irrelevant.

Epsilon_Eridani 377 reads
posted
17 / 23
a teachable moment?

"Your taughts, if any?"

I don't have any 'taughts' because I'm not a teacher.

oh, there's no plural in the word 'taught'

89Springer 396 reads
posted
18 / 23
When your outlook is reduced to a Ray Stevens song..

you've got problems. ;)

Yeah, I know. The song title is "Everything is beautiful."  So sue me.

Lanforce 8 Reviews 540 reads
posted
19 / 23
Actually the Beauty Part HAS Been Studied Mathematically...

While X may always equal 7 (old SAT guessing guidlines), the magic number for beauty is 1.618 a number known to the ancient Greeks as Phi.

A 2009 recap of an older 1980's study confirms that Phi and all its permutations continues to be the leading mathematical way to assess female beauty.  In the original study, over 1000 participants were shown over 250 pictures of real female faces and asked to rate them on a scale of 1 to 100.  The results were overwhelmingly lopsided, providing researchers with prime data to extrapolate the mathematical correlation of "beauty".

Not surprisingly, from a mathematical perspective, Michelle Pfeiffer was the clear winner (remember this WAS the 80's) - something which could have also been determined by a random survey of every masturbating teenager in the Northern Hemisphere.

In the 2009 update, Pfeiffer remains on the list, with Catherine Zeta-Jones coming in a close second.

To the point of the original post, both Zeta-Jones and Pfeiffer have reported IQ's above 160.
(Funny side note - James Woods has an IQ over 180, and is in no way considered attractive by the average human).

Something tells me if you did an analysis on virtual women in online gaming, their features would correlate well with this Phi hypothesis
Related Link: The Perfect 10 is Actually 1.618

HarryWotton 11 Reviews 964 reads
posted
20 / 23
Yes, and there is more, even babies recognize it.

Subsequent studies have also shown that babies will gaze into the faces of people with these ratios for longer amounts of time and they are also more likely to smile at them.    Angles and symmetry are also a big deal as I am sure Andrewww can confirm. lol!

rrasha88 See my TER Reviews 417 reads
posted
21 / 23
Shows how much I know.

I thought it meant that she custom drills bowling balls.

Fridays117 27 Reviews 442 reads
posted
22 / 23
It ain't about bowling balls

See link

Related Link: http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=35456&boardID=88...

inicky46 61 Reviews 406 reads
posted
23 / 23
Zo vaht? I writes vaht I vants. -e-



-- Modified on 10/5/2014 8:13:30 PM

Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!