What are we watching? Lol
Picking up on the first 10/10 thread of the new year a few days ago, I thought I would share an interesting twist. No doubt there are some providers out there trying to manipulate the system to keep their numbers inflated. I recently had a situation that went the other way.
I had a great experience with a gorgeous new provider I had just met. When I said I would be happy to write a review, she was very interested to know what my scores would be and specifically did not want a 10/10. That is right, you heard me, she did not want a 10/10. Now, I have yet to hand one out, in this case a 9/9 is a no brainer, and darn close to a 10/10 in my book. However, she seems to be a bit lower volume, didn't want her phone or email lighting up like crazy, and (I think most importantly) didn't want new clients to have unrealistic expectations. On that note (and I am not looking to stir the pot further here or start another thread), she mentioned some guys seem to think that if a provider got a 10/10 there are other 'of the menu items' being offered...
So who knows, maybe 9/9 is the new 10/10...
Thoughts
There is no question review readers wonder how she got those 10/10s. Given the way different reviewers understand the grading scale it's appropriate to look at those scores with more than a grain of salt. If I see a few 10/10s I just assume it's manginas over-grading. If I see nothing but 10/10s I'm very suspicious and more likely to avoid her.
So perhaps your new provider is right.
Another reason is some gals are so protective of their turf and their place in the rankings they will go after a gal who looks like she may threaten her standing.
There have been a couple of times I've come close to the magic 10, but what happens if you think you've found perfection, and 6 months later someone far exceeds it?
At least with a 9/9, if you go back and the second or fifth time exceeds the first one, then that's great. However, you don't get to re-grade.
And according to the rules, a provider has to be willing to do certain activities to warrant the magic 10, so they are automatically ineligible for the 10 score.
Fascinating concept and I'm looking forward to the opinions.
I've only done that once over the years...and when you write the new one the old one is taken off her page. So if you want to give her that 10/10 for reasons you state...go right ahead and feel free to do that.
It also works the other way as well....that 10/10 you give that gal can be amended with another more current review....maybe she really only should have a 7/8. But I suggest that may cause you a shitload of headaches LOL
As for the 10 in performance...seems every gal is able to get that. All she needs is to "offer" those options. And who's to say she doesn't offer them?
At least with a 9/9, if you go back and the second or fifth time exceeds the first one, then that's great. However, you don't get to re-grade.
And according to the rules, a provider has to be willing to do certain activities to warrant the magic 10, so they are automatically ineligible for the 10 score.
Fascinating concept and I'm looking forward to the opinions.
few. This is THE exact reason why the 'point' system should just disappear. How about 'just' the writeups of the reviews minus the grading system. I don't get it. I just don't get it.
Reviews IMO are to verify a lady here and perhaps explain what she's about in a paragraph or 2 or 3 so you have an idea what to expect. Each scenario is all 'opinion' based and speculative anyhow, what good is the rating to go with it? WHO THE FUCK really cares if she has a 9/9 10/10 8/7 6/5 2/1 4/5, you get my drift.....the experience should be all spelled out 'in' the writeup of the review where either she failed or succeeded. Period. End of discussion.
There MUST be another way than this ridiculous grading system like we're a bunch of cattle waiting to be chosen for the prime cut of beef to be slaughtered that evening......
Jesus H. Christ, enough already. Sorry, blame it on CPA, he made me fiesty.
Listen ALL women here are beautiful in some form or fashion. And ALL offer something unique. If you guys can't figure out in a 'writeup' by your fellow gentlemen friends in this community if she's the kind of woman you want to spend time with, then I guess I feel sorry for you. You are grown men, figure it out. Two lil #'s shouldn't be godforesaken end factor of where you're mind and dick end up one evening. Come on.
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 5:26:49 PM
Just like men, some women are downright ugly. You can try to sugarcoat it all you like, but those are just the facts. Men have been rating women on a 1-10 scale for as long as men could count from 1-10. That's not ever going to change.
I will agree that the numerical scores as they are used here on TER are virtually useless. between scoring manipulation on the part of SOME women and the lack of any kind of standards by SOME men. I have to agree with the bottom line that the numerical scores aren't much help in making a decision on who to see. I still maintain the most useful part of any review, at least where it comes to appearance is "are the pictures accurate?" As long as the reviewer is honest about that part of the review, that's good enough for me.
It's better than no numbers.
A range of numbers are data however flawed.
There are few patterns I look for and it's actually not 10's.
1. I'm more worried about low numbers.
I don't want to play at that end.
So, I'm arguing its a useful tiering system of sorts.
Although its compressed and manipulated at the top end.
2. I actually learn a lot by looking through the guys a provider sees.
In that case, flashing a guy's review scores gives me a quick picture of his behavior even if I haven't read his reviews or don't know him.
An extreme example is when we all see that a provider only has a string of high scores from reviewers with one review- her.
That of course is another red flag.
Bottom line, I'm saying the numbers do make a difference.
And I do look at the field for whether the pics are representative too.
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 11:00:54 PM
ALL women are NOT beautiful....not by a long shot. Some are, as GaG pointed out, downright ugly. The reflection in a mirror is not indicative of beauty...as far too often when a woman opens her mouth she goes from "that hot broad I'd like to fuck" to someone that I can't get far enough away from fast enough.
Some are beautiful...some stutter. Some are plain and are fucking brilliant. And some are ugly but are a shitload of fun to be around.
As far as the scoring system here...no one is forcing you or any gal to participate here. If someone doesn't want to be part of the TER scoring system, all they need do is delist themselves.
See...that was easy!!
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 5:26:49 PM
some of those 'ugly' women you two are talking about are getting reviews so gentlemen are seeing them. They have a niche like anyone here. And yes, they are beautiful. Never said, the 'mirror' was indicative of anything especially 'beauty', don't put words in my mouth this evening. 'Beautiful' is a broad term I use to describe many things in this world and not in the 'dictionary' form.....in that all women are beautiful offering their 'own' thing......it is interesting that you two apparently took it as your 'mirror' analogy however.......isn't that interesting.
And I'm pretty sure I can take a wild guess as to your 'scenario' of broadcasted women you speak of according to your descriptions. However, I never complained of being 'here'. I complain of how things are 'run' here. As TER makes changes and they are making changes, what's wrong with adding a lil more .02. Does everyone not BITCH about the damn rating scores as it is...you all do with the inflated 10/10's, hell I've heard more about that in the last 2 months to last me a lifetime.......I'm a problem solver...if there's a fucking problem, you fix it, you don't sit and whine about it for the next 30 years. You see my friend, that's the difference between you and I.
Just cause it's been here since the 'cows' age like you, doesn't mean it's always 'right'.
'Change' is good.
Scanning a post and then replying to it with some nonsense that had nothing to do with that post is a problem. And you do seem to have a propensity for doing this.
I didn't suggest any woman in my post...but knowing what I know I understand your issues on this thread.
YOU were whining about the scoring system. That has been beaten to death over the years. The only solution as of today is to delist yourself. See...problem solved.
Or you could go to the S&P board and suggest to TER that you and others don't care to have numbers on the reviews. Maybe that will get TER to change the format, but not terribly likely any time soon. So it's a problem in many respects as the gals who solicit for higher scores use whatever is available to make that happen. What guys have learned is that there are women who are manipulating the system, and they have learned to understand the system as it is currently operating.
And as GaG pointed out much earlier, guys have been rating women on a 1-10 scale since they learned to count (admittedly some guys still can't...and just follow the masses then LOL).
And change can be good...but to enact it is not always the solution.
And I'm pretty sure I can take a wild guess as to your 'scenario' of broadcasted women you speak of according to your descriptions. However, I never complained of being 'here'. I complain of how things are 'run' here. As TER makes changes and they are making changes, what's wrong with adding a lil more .02. Does everyone not BITCH about the damn rating scores as it is...you all do with the inflated 10/10's, hell I've heard more about that in the last 2 months to last me a lifetime.......I'm a problem solver...if there's a fucking problem, you fix it, you don't sit and whine about it for the next 30 years. You see my friend, that's the difference between you and I.
Just cause it's been here since the 'cows' age like you, doesn't mean it's always 'right'.
'Change' is good.
argue with you . I read your post, thoroughly thanks. And you so did 'suggest' women and I'm pretty sure I can pinpoint each woman you were 'describing' even tho you didn't spell out their names...don't go there with me and play that mindtwisting game you always play, it won't work, at least not with me. I'm too smart for that shit.
And I'm not taking to the S&P board, the discussion was brought up here, so the discussion is here. I'm not the one whining, I'm discussing, and just want it to end already like many others as it's apparently a topic that gets overly talked about, yet no one offers to fix the damn problem.
Lil FYI, just because men (you and GAG that is) have been 'rating' women since the dawn of time......hasn't, doesn't, will not make it 'right'....EVER. If that's not a 'sweeping generalization' to put it bluntly, well hell I don't know what is. Get over it. Unless of course, you're a woman now too...........
Make sure you read this clearly so you can comprehend it correctly.
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 6:49:41 PM
Some are beautiful...some stutter. Some are plain and are fucking brilliant. And some are ugly but are a shitload of fun to be around.
As far as the scoring system here...no one is forcing you or any gal to participate here. If someone doesn't want to be part of the TER scoring system, all they need do is delist themselves.
See...that was easy!!
You know what they say when you ASSUME?
Griping on this board about the scoring system is simply whining. And you don't have any cheese with it. Take your idea over to the S&P board and let TER know that you and others want this system changed. Maybe they'll take it under advisement LOL
I also didn't say since the "dawn of time" (and neither did GaG)....WE said that since man learned to count. And that's only the past several thousand years. The dawn of time is quite a bit older than that.
And I'm not taking to the S&P board, the discussion was brought up here, so the discussion is here. I'm not the one whining, I'm discussing, and just want it to end already like many others as it's apparently a topic that gets overly talked about, yet no one offers to fix the damn problem.
Lil FYI, just because men (you and GAG that is) have been 'rating' women since the dawn of time......hasn't, doesn't, will not make it 'right'....EVER. If that's not a 'sweeping generalization' to put it bluntly, well hell I don't know what is. Get over it. Unless of course, you're a woman now too...........
Make sure you read this clearly so you can comprehend it correctly.
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 6:49:41 PM
My ex's cousin's daughter is (or at least was) really, really, really hot. At a family gathering I got into a conversation with her, if you want to call it that. I've never met anyone as dumb in my life. I couldn't wait to get away from her. No number of 10's could make me pay to be with her.
Because my idea of beauty may not be the same as someone else's. But the performance score serves a very useful purpose: I don't have the time or inclination to read 20 or 30 reviews on a provider, but I'll certainly pay attention to multiple low ratings, and all 10s make me suspicious (no one is all things to all people) and I'm going to maybe send some PMs before I move forward, etc. So while I don't use the performance ratings as a yardstick against which to measure my experience and I I try to look at all available info in totality, they are a useful tool.
If the photos are recent and "real" I've already decided yes or no on appearance.
There are "standards" behind the "Performance" scores.
It's all subjective, so that means I can use large numbers, small numbers, whole numbers, fractional numbers, irrational numbers, or imaginary numbers!!
We beat the crap out of each other on this and other topics but when it comes right down to it none of us is leaving this recreation behind any time soon are we? If anyone has another shorthand way to help participants understand whether a woman is generally attractive I'm sure we'd all be ears. Until then, this is the best we have. It's sort of like democracy--it's the absolute worst form of governance, except for all the others.
The simple fact is that, if a lady has a couple of scores that are a 6 or below I simply stop reading. After more than a decade on this board I think I have accumulated enough knowledge to surmise that even if the reviewers are hard graders it's just not worth my time. But that's my choice. Any lady who thinks I shouldn't darken her doorstep because of my strict approach can choose to cross me off her list. But from what I can tell most of the women who are regular posters here seem to be getting along pretty well despite the fact that some of us troglodytes keep scoring women based on their appearance (news flash--women do this too). Stressing over that fact strikes me as a waste of calories when there's so much fun to be had.
And regardless of what each of us thinks is the purpose of TER it is spelled out in text so our opinions don't really matter. And what they can't put in text but what each of us really appreciates and is here for is to find safe and convenient ways to hump each other silly as often and in as many positions as we can think of. I'm going to put my energy into that.
that she could or did not give you her very best but just that some people always think they can do even better because they are trying to push themselves. It is probably for the reasons she gave you but if it is partly for the latter then I admire her for that.
I am darn glad I am going to be seeing her again pretty soon. Who knows, maybe she will give me her BEST performance over the next few dates..
in the 'circus' now too? Please tell me you hear yourself......
He's excited about getting good service ...as a client. Because that's what he is.
This is a f-ck board and the second score is called performance.
Would you rather he describe exactly what he wants her to do here.
Geez, if you would get over your midlife crisis over aging here or delist yourself, I for one would be mighty pleased
"Geez, if you would get over your midlife crisis over aging here or delist yourself, I for one would be mighty pleased."
That's almost marginally funny, but more sad than anything. If you want the input of teenagers, that is your right, your prerogative, and by all means, go search it out. Texting with backpage 20 somethings may be your style but keep it to your self. Please.
However, your right to swing out and assert your opinions ends at the tip of someone's nose.
Personally, I prefer the wisdom of someone who has been able to vote in more than two presidential elections. We might be able to have intelligent discussions. We may have experience loss, love, life, great concerts. We might be able to surprise each other with one or two amazing sexual treats learned over time. We could share a favorite recipe. It might be me, but I do appreciate the line that " a good day is one where you learn something new". Funny what that thing called maturity does for a soul.
If you want to be an a boorish jagoff, that is your prerogative. Jacking with a lady because you don't like her age, just FO & D or grow up or de-list your ignorance and hatred. Nothing personal
-- Modified on 1/11/2014 1:39:15 AM
Thank you for digesting and then following up with a response more in line with your usual face burying posts
High pitched Archer voice: nailed it! Lol.
Relax, enjoy here, have a good day.
I think you mean "da bomb."
It's easy for a lady your age to miss the lingo.
BTW. Shouldn't the WK be battling a killer rabbit?
Monty python is cool but WKs definitely are not.'
I'm liking this new calling card-easy target.
I was going to leave it at my first response but something else should be said to you WKs.
A lady like this has been around and certainly has carved out a niche for herself and knows the what's what IRL.
And yes she is entitled to her opinion.
And I'm entitled to mine. I feel for her when she sets herself up to get trashed. But when she propagates this whiny persona who spouts these nonsense illusions about decorum among providers and j-hns on a f-ckboard, a line should be drawn.
Im sorry you didnt like my remark. But I'm not the only one who feels this way based on the likes and pm'd I've gotten in response to my pointed reply.
That's my $.03.
As for you, this is nothing personal, but I also prefer it when you stick to light shill opinions about how much you want to bury your face in some refined bush you are itching to rent... I think that was even the entire title of the post. And let that be your calling card. The how Dave defines himself.
for me...I'm quite the big girl. However, that is sweet. Do I know you? Hmmmm.....you sound like someone I maybe know.
My 'nonsense illusions' are only illusions to those who just don't understand...and I'm ok with that. Why aren't you is the question....ok with it I mean.
And a 'friend' once recently told me...you will never fit 'in'...and I'm quite ok with that too. Seeing what 'really' goes on here especially. Perhaps that's why they say there are those who will forever think 'outside' the box...never 'in'......
-- Modified on 1/11/2014 4:10:18 AM
Taylor, while well into middle age IRL, is a newbie where it comes to hooking. She came on this board as yet another newbie hooker that already knew everything about everything, and won our hearts by telling us that we had been doing this all wrong for all the decades some of us having been involved in P4P.
She has tried to reinvent herself a couple of times, but always reverts to form." A BSC, aging hooker, with some serious delusions about where and how she fits in this world of ours"
I will say that she is good for a few chuckles here and there, and it appears that after months of trying, she has finally gotten herself a couple of WhiteKnights to stick up for her when the rest of the board gets "mean" and starts picking on her.
If my memory serves me right, she has been here around 6-8 months, but most of the evidence has been removed as the craziest of her countless BSC posts have been removed, as have all the posts under her "alter egos".
So yes, she is a BSC middle aged (old) provider, but she is not like most of the members of the OTHFBC, as she really hasn't been doing this for long. With Taylor you get the "best" of both worlds, "old age, combined with inexperience" what more could a WK ask for??? lmao
there are two buckets here. Those with a clue and those without. Now while some are guilty of jumping from one bucket to the next, there are some who simply jump and miss all too often. And ouch that must hurt lol. Complete ignorance is a funny thing to watch, isn't it? I wouldn't suspect the buckets are even close to being even either. It is what it is and hey there's always the same ol' excuse...'its just a fuck board.' Now that I give a 10/10 
No need to get too worked up.
I don't want to be the one responsible for sending you into another tizzy.
Ladies of your age have significant stroke risk.
Seinfeld: Serenity now!
Archer: you're in the dannnn- ger zone!
Lol
In reading this thread I find it impossible not draw a correlation to cattle auctions I've been to in the midwest.
Ya'll do know you're talking about human women right?
Right? sigh...
I myself making jokes about us providers for 300 an hour as 2 dollars per 150 pounds of meat ..
yes ..or may be 10 dollars? Is not it is all the same?
I a here not talk about that
just to gave my thumb up for the cow thing when talking about sexy woman ..
I am ok with sexy cow classification ..
Let me explain WHY in Russia words
"Look Look what a cow goes there.. look at legs .. look at tits .. look at wet eyes ..log eyelashes .. big lips.. elegant back ... she is a cow I want to have .. "
why those words would be not sooo bad ??
Becuase our cows does not look as bulls with tits between legs ..
( and I afraid again get under croos fire - PLEASE know - I talk about REAL animals - about COWS NOT a women )
But I can not hold myself from mentions how Russian cows are prettier then Americans !!!OM G when I first time saw caw in states I was thinking it is BULL
and I DO TALK ABOUT REAL COWS
..
I was soo surprised to see here cows in states do look as bulls ... same shape same size
. just between legs .. back legs
ha ha ha
.. you know how it in english this staff which cow has
- with nipples ??
.. in Russia we call it Vamya not "a cow s tits" ha ha ..
how call it in English ??
I am not farm girl so do not know ..
Of course I may make a research and myself on this word
.. so any way in states mostly
.. cow s tits between her legs indicate that it is a cow not a bull
Its general frame be heavy .. big, no curves, no elegant ... shoulders be wide s buffalo would have
legs are short .. etc ... just asa male not as female animal...
Russian cows are way more in shape and lighter in the body frame and have more nice elegant even walk ! even how she will look at you how she will turn her body ..
as females .. even how they horns are growing even curve of her back and her legs are way longer then bulls have .. they are AMASING elegant those cows in Russia..
I NOT talking about women .. so do not get mad at me please girls and boys I just talk about REAL COWS and BULLS
those whom I saw on country roads driving by in the car or on the bike .. stopping and looking at them
for me all was sooo different here so I looked at every animal here if it is the same as where Iam from ..
so
who ahve been in Russia and who was traveling by country side you would stop and see at those soooo different then American cows Russian cowss .. you be surprised
and when our men call us cow- they mean NOT just sex and milk.. they trully make you a compliment about big big wet eyes .. about big eyelashes - go find russian cow and look at her eyes .. face - you will fall in love with COW .. it is true tru tru compliment for HOT SUPER HOT woman in russia-
-Look Look what a cow goes there.. look at legs .. look at tits .. look at eyes .. eyelashes .. big lips ..
Why I have to be offended ? May I ask ?
In Russia good cow cost as BMW .. many do not need BMW but will buy a cow .. ..
ha ha ha
sorry here I made an analogy ..
-- Modified on 1/10/2014 11:19:14 PM
if one day I will settled down it would be country side near NYC so day time cows and horses ( stallions are better ).. at evening opera jazz and swingers clubs
but I DO NOT LIKE GOATS .. those are mean and old.... if not mean ... just old .. it can work ..
Ever wonder what would have happened if Mrs. Douglas and the girls from Petticoat Junction decided to open up a cathouse?
I think I just tuned into the Borat channel on public access cable...
Just when I think I'll never get one of those flashbacks Nancy Reagan warned me about....
Correct me if I am wrong, but back in the 70's-80's we were promised that if we did acid, sometime 20+ years later we would get a "flashback" which would be a similar "trip" just like the first one, but without having to do any more acid to get this second "trip".
Personally I took this as a "two for one" sale" and I am still waiting for all these free trips that I was promised. Where are my flashbacks, I want my flashbacks
Of course you might need to be tripping to make sense of some of Serafima/belebou's posts.
Pick in Serafima here or in the ny board because anyone who sounds that BSC and is Russian
Must have a Vor y zakone behind her.
Hey, I saw Eastern promises. Lol.
First of all I am US citizen as well as Russian as well as EU Yes 3 passports
I do not have anything in common with Russian Mafia
and you need to know ..- with death of Yapnchik I think they took under control.. or went deeper..
in any case - if those do exist - I do not know them - of course if I want and someone will get really bad on my safety -
I will go just
TO AMERICAN COP
not too Russian Mahia
and any way yes I do look as Anna Samohina whn I have short hair
and mY Rita yes - THE BEST
here you are correct
1. I am offended that you think there some Russian pimps behind me -
2 I am impressed you do know the movie
Movie is kind of .. old .. but yes fun
I never ever smoked a weed .
myself .. aroud me - always .. those crazy people - I am clean and not touching it
and why it is people always tell me something like that ? it means only one - I can HAVE FUN WITH NO DRUGS while some even tripping can t get it to the roof top ... it is s we say in russia gone by the wind .. roof top I mean ... my logics can take you roof away sorry .. it is we call no drug fun with Serafima Common .I am not drug user , nor have any pimps..
I have normal job ( thanks god can call this just HOBBY .. as I alasy did ..
Iam as you are hobbyists .. not a provider .. so please make a note on that .
and let hobby together 
-- Modified on 1/11/2014 7:31:24 PM
However, when I read about sexy cows, I think my promised flashbacks were sent to the wrong address!
And then the cow with beautiful eyes started to quote Jefferson Airplane lyrics and I heard Jerry Garcia talk to me about livestock...
I always wondered what would happen if you mixed peyote with thorazine and the answer is before me.
i tit is it really for you all was in 70 and 80 ?
I do not know about your investments but i do know investments in drugs and providers never will have good ROI ..
all be false .. false fun and promise try better real life it is better ant drugs love is better drug .. just not many can deliver that nor take it in correct doze
it is my drug love, poetry, sex and music
if not let me show you how have fun with no tripping just with drippings
-- Modified on 1/11/2014 7:16:53 PM