since the validity of 10/10 ratings has been discussed at length recently..i have a hypothetical question for our ladies..assuming you are a provider who consistently gets 10/10 scores in your reviews..do you in fact check the reviews of any potential client to assure yourself that he does rate his lades highly? or not even bother to check if he meets your screening criteria? no trade secrets need to be revealed in this hypotheses..

If your boss is known to give 7/6,  5/2, 7/7 annual performance reviews
would YOU wanna work for him?

that moment.

I've always said - one man's 10 is another man's 2 and and one man's 2 is another man's 10.

Nobody should ever dictate what rating you have to give.

There are some men who score all their dates 10/10.  What does it tell me?  They choose wisely.

If i see someone scoring low time after time after time - it tells me he is a self hating prick that can't be satisfied no matter who he sees.

Lina

I believe that poster came up with scheme where you go and re-rate your previous experiences based on latest hooker you seen.

Who cares what other dudes do?  Just get your own groove on

Lina

So I don't hold much by it.  I look for consistancy...   rating swings are a red flag to me.  I expect a variance with each unique coupling...  but a small range...  say 7-8, 8-9, etc.  A wide range like 3-8 or 4-9 makes me suspicious.    Either she only does well with some she clicks with (and face it my stud days are long behind me) or there's something funky about the high scores.  I don't fret about an occasional outlier...  high or low.

Numbers are subjective and always will be, yet we have neverending gripes about "She got a 9 and I'm pissed because I think she is only a 7".

The nembers are near useless, especially for looks.  They are a lazy way out for guys who don't want to take the time to write words.

I can imagine why...and I just started another thread as that seems the most reasonable reason those ladies were awarded perfect scores.

I don't understand why guys give these scores out based on any looks...most are average looking women.

But I just guess that the guys are so happy that someone fucked them...they're just thrilled.

women who care about that type of thing. OTOH, it also weakens his credibility as a reviewer to many guys. I don't look for guys who only give out high scores before seeing them, but I do look for guys who do on purpose to only give low scores. I also read the content and see how much of an ahole he might be, is he demanding, impossible to please, etc.

I could have saved a lot of lower scores had I not seen certain people, but whatever. My goal is not to be a Top Hooker. If anyone thinks their review scores reflect who they really are, they are very naive. Many women just won't do with every guy what it takes to get those scores on a consistent basis, and I am one of them. If I did what I am willing to do with a BF, no doubt my scores would be flawless...not gonna happen.

... and, yes, its because I mostly choose wisely. I have a couple of semi-low, critical ones where I made a mistake in my choice. I don't really have many with an 8 or 7 and there is a reason for that. I tend to only bother to write a review when the experience is really great or below par. I'm not one of those guys who writes a review for every gal he sees. I don't see the point in writing a review where I give the lady the same scores with the same details on menu items as the 3 other pages worth she already has.

As for the OP's question, I have had a few ladies tell me they check a guy's reviews to see how they score. I've even had a lady recite a line from one of my reviews to me when we met.

My reviews are fairly high for a couple of reasons.  First and foremost, when I investigate, I only look at girls with fairly high scores.  I definitely look at any big swings and read those reviews NOT just look at numbers.  The second reason is that if I have a mediocre experience (say a 6/7 or 7/6) then I don't review that experience.  I do this because on the few experiences I have had like this, it really was as much my fault as it was hers so she should not be punished.  If I ever felt that I had been abused or neglected thru no fault of my own, I certainly would put a poor review up.  I do this also to protect myself because I don't want to be seen as someone who is unreasonable or too demanding.  I think that that too would make providers a bit hesitant to see me.  I just try to be fair all the way around.

The other thing that I think is really important, is to look at the track record of the reviewer.  Look who he has seen and where.  The type of lady that he seeks is as important to his outcome as the lady herself.  There is alot of reading here if you look for it, and most of it is very entertaining.  Take some time,  investigate well, and then let your chips fall where they may.  Have fun, be safe.

Brianna Banks and Brigitte Adair are NOT 'average looking women'....

I mean, great if you do, but if I see a 10/10 and read the review, and there is nothing in there other than a guy saying she rocked my world, that doesn't a 10/10 in my book.  It just means this guy thinks she is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

And that's fine.

But if I don't see verbiage in the review to give me any kinda indication I would feel the same way, I really could care less.

Bottom line...I don't really give a shit about the numbers above a certain number.  If a girl has 8s and above consistently, I will take a look.  If the scores are lower, I pass.

It's like looking at a bond and looking at the ratings.  Just because S&P calls it AAA doesn't mean it is AAA.  Whether it's A or AA or AAA, I'll take a look and do my own work.  But if S&P is rating the sucker as junk, I ain't gonna give a shit.

Same thing with scores.