Write Review
2,077,839 Total Reviews 3,607 New Reviews
8,224 Users Online

TER General Board

While I don't disagree (lol), my point was more geared toward Martha's hips...
natashalynne See my TER Reviews 188 reads
posted

her hip to waist ratio is pretty high.  Most of today's "mainstream" models have much lower ratios.   Which is actually kind of ironic given the ever increasing size of the average American.  But that's not the point either.  lol

I think that "objective" or "popular" definitions of beauty have changed, ever so subtlety, since Martha was in her prime.  And I think that subtle difference can affect whether is someone is rated a 7 vs 8 vs 9.

Very interesting subject, Claudius.

Claudius42310706 reads

i propose to post pictures and ratings to encourage dialogue about establishing an appearance scale and illustrating diversity in tastes. now Martha Stewart was a model. therefore she was, as defined by the market "model material" a 9.

the game is to either post your evaluation of this pic of Martha on the TER scale OR post a non provider pic that you think is a 9. (no provider ads on the GD.)

ReplyQuoteReport
MSHSEX259 reads

I rate those pics an 8. I have personally spent time with much better looking girls than that in the pics.

Posted By: Claudius42310
i propose to post pictures and ratings to encourage dialogue about establishing an appearance scale and illustrating diversity in tastes. now Martha Stewart was a model. therefore she was, as defined by the market "model material" a 9.

the game is to either post your evaluation of this pic of Martha on the TER scale OR post a non provider pic that you think is a 9. (no provider ads on the GD.)

ReplyQuoteReport
McDonald000199 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Claudius42310193 reads

you undermine the "validity" of the appearance score, right?

ReplyQuoteReport
McDonald000186 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Drunk³207 reads

Her Attentiveness, especially a smiling girl (for men)
And a men who gives off image of success, money, charisma (for women.)
Not that you didn't know this already, imo, many factors play in (but only to a certain extent) and sometimes two can't be isolated when the score gap (what you refer to as variance) becomes narrower.

ReplyQuoteReport
golf1953188 reads

So whats happening here? Same girl you walked into the session and your first
inpression was shes a 7 and somehow at the end of the session shes an 8 or a 9.
This has happened to me a few times too. It seems to have a direct relation to
the intensity and passion of the session, but still the same lady so why the change.
   My guess is that 'chemestry' thing has kicked in and somehow her incredible
performance has changed your whole perception of how she looks. Im also thinking
this can certainly have the opposite effect.
 So the big question when I review her is do I give her my first opinion or the last?

ReplyQuoteReport
martythewall286 reads

Pictures are black and white and outdated styles, While some might be old enough to feel a connection most would not I beleave.  If current style photo in color was posted it would be a much more fair and objective rating.  Based on what I see there it coul range from 8 to 10 depending on eye color, hair color and make up,

ReplyQuoteReport
Claudius42310293 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Claudius42310237 reads

also defined by the market as a 9. if you're working as a model and making a living, how can you not be "model material"?

ReplyQuoteReport
martythewall201 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
tomcat0360271 reads

I usually deduct at least one point from the TER score to get a feel of what she really looks like if I meet her in public.  Of course, this only applies to someone whose face is blurred; I can judge right away if her face is not blurred. Let's get real; there cannot be this many real-world 10's and 9's on TER. On top of that, they only charge 300? LOL

ReplyQuoteReport
Drunk³243 reads

She is still within "attractive range" in terms of bodily measurements, proportions considered to be attractive, and facial characteristics, hence a seven. My guess is there won't be many people rating her a 2 or 3s or 4s, 5s, if at all,  since she is within the range.

not my type to get a 9 though but I'm sure people from her time period thought she is above 7.

Posted By: Claudius42310
i propose to post pictures and ratings to encourage dialogue about establishing an appearance scale and illustrating diversity in tastes. now Martha Stewart was a model. therefore she was, as defined by the market "model material" a 9.

the game is to either post your evaluation of this pic of Martha on the TER scale OR post a non provider pic that you think is a 9. (no provider ads on the GD.)

ReplyQuoteReport
lilli212 reads

a 10 is much easier...in women like Dorothy Dandridge, or AishwaryaRai Bachchan i can find no flaws, no small thing which could be changed that would improve their appearance. the Martha Stewart pictures posted i find to be unappealing, and would perhaps rate a 6 at best. thin lips, dull skin tone, average hair, and what appears to be a semi-wide but flat backside. not to mention, she looks very, very unfriendly, lol. yes, this is all extremely subjective, much more so than many seem to realize.



-- Modified on 1/25/2012 8:44:55 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
scoed250 reads

Talina A, below is a 9. All the models I posted because they are hot and not a gag are 9's. I have yet to post a 10. Photo is from Met-Art.com.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!