when the subject is especially good looking. While some guys have no problem indicating that a drop dead gorgeous lady was less than ordinary in bed; there are other guys who are quite visual and regardless of the woman's performance, his experience is acutely enhanced simply because he is having sex with a beautiful lady. I tend to believe that this results in a higher performance score more often than we might like to admit.
I've had a little downtime so I did an analysis. It strikes me there is little to no corelation between provider looks and scores. In fact in my area the most beloeved providers are not the most stunningly beautiful.
While they aren't homely, they have learned to use their mind and attitude to be sexy. One of my ATF's is around 50. She is well maintained and she has the amazing ability to make me feel like the biggest stud on the planet. Many of the very young and pretty girls treat it like a business transaction. If they react at all, its very fake (quit moaning I haven't put it in yet). I'll take the older one with a few miles because in the end she leaves me feeling more satisfied. Some of my other favorites are slightly over weight or have some other flaw. However, they more than make up for it.
Thanks for listening.
...I agree that there is no correlation between looks and performance but to me sexual ability is entirely random.
I've met pretty girls who were great and the more homely type who were great as well. I've met pretty girls who were useless and homely types who were useless as well.
The idea that the more homely type makes up for it in different ways does not ring true to me based upon my own experience. Young and pretty girls can do it as well as anybody else. Some of the best paid shags I've had have been with very obviously attractive women.
. . . a negative correlation.
Perhaps. There is always the exception to the rule. I'm speaking in general.
While I agree that the brain is the most important sex organ I have been with plenty of beautiful women who knew how to use both their brains and their great bodies to satisfy me. Yes, there are plenty of great providers who may not be a "ten" in looks but there are plenty of "tens" who I've been disappointed with over the years.
Honestly, I find more of a correlation with age and performance than I do with looks. I definitely prefer older gals (late 20's and up).
have been a 50-50 proposition lately whether I'll get off. The young-uns seem to think that just seeing their naked bodies should be enough to get you excited. Your erection is your responsiblity, buddy! Which is fine if you bring the wood before you get to the party. Maybe it has to do with not having enough of life's seasoning yet.
-- Modified on 2/18/2007 1:02:33 PM
I started seriously hobbying at 40 (now 46) and found that, much to my dismay, younger providers weren't doing it for me. Obviously there were exceptions. I found that if I had some sort of communication prior to the session I could usually deduce whether it would be wise to schedule. Many young providers do not really want to 'do' men who are their father's age. So I would suggest that you ask first.
I think age is an issue for some no matter what they look like. I am not in my 40's or 30's yet so I can't speak for the older guys in here (not that there is anything wrong with being older).
The providers I've seen have ranged in age from 20's, 30's, and a few of them in their 40's. Most of the 20 and 30 year olds can talk to me pretty easily and I see no real difference in performance from any of them. Maybe because of my age they are more willing than with someone like some of you put it (in their fathers age range).
On the other hand the few 40 year olds I've seen seemed to be a little put off by my age at the start, thinking I might be immature and a "lets bang and finish quickly" type of guy which I am not.
I generally like to talk to a provider first (if I've never seen her before) just to get an idea of her personality, what she might be into, and where the boundaries are.
I have to say after chatting with the 40 year olds their performances were up there with the others who were more close to my age.
Also their looks ranged too but really there is something beautiful about most women when you really give them a chance and get to know them.
Just my thoughts...
While I do agree with the general consensus that there is no correlation between looks and performance, I have found that most providers who classify themselves as BBW's definitely get high marks in both performance and attitude. In my eperiences, BBW's have great personalities and it usually translates into tremendous service (mostly at a below market price as well).
when the subject is especially good looking. While some guys have no problem indicating that a drop dead gorgeous lady was less than ordinary in bed; there are other guys who are quite visual and regardless of the woman's performance, his experience is acutely enhanced simply because he is having sex with a beautiful lady. I tend to believe that this results in a higher performance score more often than we might like to admit.
I agree that this probably happens quite a bit. I can't really say it's wrong since, if the guy is visually stimulated, the girls looks had a lot to do with how much fun he had. Personally I think the number ratings are the weak link in the review system. I don't put much stock into the numbers alone. Some guys give glowing reviews but only award a "7" for performance while other bitch that the girl wouldn't perform a particular act but still give her an "8". The numbers are way too arbitrary, the written reviews are what matter to me.
A few moments after I posted my reply I was going to add an ending statement that I do not think it is necessarily wrong for a guy to score a beautiful lady high in performance if he was immensely turned on and had a good time. This is a prime example of the subjectiveness of the numerical rating scale.
I'll share an embarassing account about one of my early hobbying experiences. It was during a date with a provider that I honestly believe, regardless of gender, would be described as being positively beautiful. She was simply goregeous and was one of the most beautiful woman that I was ever with during a sexual or non-sexual private encounter.
I actually trembled when we touched and kissed. She thought I was nervous but in reality I was stunned. When she began a BBBJ, I had to stop her after 15 seconds for fear of losing it. I then moved to DATY and for the first time in my life I almost came simply by doing this. I was on fire and truly felt like I was in a dream. A light breeze on my throbbing member would have taken me over the edge. When I entered her in mish, I looked at her insanely beautiful legs, body and face and I lasted 30 seconds tops. Although I was definitely embarrassed as hell on one level, my O was mind blowing. Surely this had to be the worse lay this woman ever had but it was one of my most memorable experiences.
During that time frame I was not writing reviews so I did not have to haggle in my mind about her performance. But today as I look back I would be hard pressed as to what to score. We did not run through a series of various positions, I cannot say that she screwed my brains out and clearly I can't say the same of me to her. On no level was this hot and heavy sex except in my mind. In addition because of my own nervousness and subsequent humiliation, I can't say that the connection intensity was particularly strong either. I was a near zero myself but how would I rate her? I was walking on Cloud 9 for weeks afterwards and my visual recollection remains sharp years later. It was a fantastic sexual encounter for me.
So I agree that the score, taken by itself, can mean little in the long run...