I have seen lots of reviews from hobbyist that see both. I don't understand the attraction to TS's, but if I had the attraction, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't write a review about the experience. Guys, Why do you write reviews on TS's? This is a P4P(ussy) board. I'm not a homophob, but it seems to me if your messing with a guy with boobs, you're a homo.
I never noticed the TS reviews myself, but my question is why do you read the TS reviews?
Posted By: bonordonor
I have seen lots of reviews from hobbyist that see both. I don't understand the attraction to TS's, but if I had the attraction, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't write a review about the experience. Guys, Why do you write reviews on TS's? This is a P4P(ussy) board. I'm not a homophob, but it seems to me if your messing with a guy with boobs, you're a homo.
And you say your not a homophob? Right...
Just because you're so close minded and don't understand someone's sexual preference doesn't mean you should be going around call them homo's
Don't shoot the messenger, I am not taking sides in this discussion, just stating the facts.
If you need proof just do a search on the subject, it's been discussed here many times before, with the same predictable results. One side calls the other homophobes and the other call them homo's in return.
I don't really care who fucks who, but there is one easy test to see if you are gay. Look at the glamour face shot of a Tranny, if you are turned on that's ok. Now look at a full frontal nude shot of the same "woman", if you are still turned on, YOU"RE GAY. not that gay is bad, but if you are a guy who is turned on by someone else with a dick, sorry but you are gay. Just roll with it, there are millions of gay men out there, no biggie, but if you do like "chicks with dicks" please don't come on this board and claim you are straight, just because you like a side of boobs with your order of dick.
and yes your cartoon describes me to a Tee, I am hardly scared, but I am an asshole.
Why not. It can be very erotic.
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 11:53:10 AM
when I read a "new" non-TS provider's review, I'll look at other reviews the reviewer wrote to judge the validity of the review and that's where I have noticed TS reviews. BTW, if I'm on the fence about making the call, I'll usually pass.
Most girls won't admit it, but a lot of girls think there's an ick factor. Like the guy is gay or at a higher risk of STDs. Which is ridiculous if you think about it logically. What's the difference between a man having sex with another man/TS? Because he sucks **** and does anal? A lot of providers do this too. As long as protection is used, the risks are probably the same as a man seeing a female escort. BUT still, lots of girls think the client is then less manly if he sees TSs which is just a mental turn off. So, it just comes down to personal preference just like anything else.
The walls of the anus tear/bleed much more easily than the walls of a vag so the risk is higher in male/male anal behavior, than heterosexual sex, be it vaginal or anal.
If you are using a condom....
We're assuming all are wearing the baggie. If it breaks inside a man's anus, bigger risk than if it breaks inside the chick's cooch.
So a guy pounding the living daylights out a woman's anus is NOT tearing like the same dick going up a guys ass? Pull your head out of your ass for christ's sake.
An anus is anus regardless if it belongs to a lady or a man. Cells go one way so the effects are the same.
Let me re-state. Protected male/male intercourse greater risk than protected male/female vag sex.
whether you have your cock stuck up the back of man, your cock stuck up the back of a TS, your cock stuck up the back of a woman, you still have your cock stuck up another humans ass.
And until I see anyone getting all righteously indignant about a man having anal sex with a female provider (which never has and never will happen), all of this nonsense about how dangerous it is to have sex with someone who is transgendered is straight-up homophobia.
If you guys were so concerned about the risks of anal sex, you wouldn't have anal sex.
Posted By: JackDunphy
Let me re-state. Protected male/male intercourse greater risk than protected male/female vag sex.
Thats not "up the back", sweetie. Its thru the front door. You might want to take a gander over at the CDC website and understand risk differences.
If you cared so much about disease, you wouldnt be giving up the whole enchilada w/o the baggie to get the 10/10 you so desperately need.
And shove that TS homophobia shit up your blow hole. You're a hooker. You shouldn't be casting judgement on anyone here.
Relax, grab a carrot. It's all good
FWIW hotplants is not a hooker. Nor does she need a review here LOL
Take a gander at my comment on this topic. And I don't need no stinking reviews either!
Posted By: JackDunphy
Thats not "up the back", sweetie. Its thru the front door. You might want to take a gander over at the CDC website and understand risk differences.
If you cared so much about disease, you wouldnt be giving up the whole enchilada w/o the baggie to get the 10/10 you so desperately need.
And shove that TS homophobia shit up your blow hole. You're a hooker. You shouldn't be casting judgement on anyone here.
Relax, grab a carrot. It's all good.
But I think you are saying something different than what I am saying. My point is simply this. Protected male/male intercourse greater risk than protected male/female vag sex. We do agree on that point, correct? And even if we disagree on it, it doesn't make one a homophobe if they do believe it.
BUT...trying to avoid girls who sleep with TS's (like we could possibly know wo does and who doesn't anyway) is lunacy for several obvious reason. On that we have no disagreement.
And if I am the person you thought I was, and if you and I had lengthy convos bc on this very topic, then you would know my thoughts, since I had time to fully explain them. And you were not offended by them for they weren't offensive.
But maybe you're not who I think you are? lol. You could have cashed out and sold off "ChgoCPA" at auction for all I know. A few hookers I know would've loved to put you out of buisness. lol
Covered vaginal is safer than covered anal...even when that anal is with a woman.
I guess that new invention didn't work out?
Nope...didn't auction off CPA. But I suspect that for each hooker that wanted to put CPA out of biz....twenty are quite pleased that I'm still here. We could take a poll... But you know how unreliable these TER polls are!
Posted By: JackDunphy
But I think you are saying something different than what I am saying. My point is simply this. Protected male/male intercourse greater risk than protected male/female vag sex. We do agree on that point, correct? And even if we disagree on it, it doesn't make one a homophobe if they do believe it.
BUT...trying to avoid girls who sleep with TS's (like we could possibly know wo does and who doesn't anyway) is lunacy for several obvious reason. On that we have no disagreement.
And if I am the person you thought I was, and if you and I had lengthy convos bc on this very topic, then you would know my thoughts, since I had time to fully explain them. And you were not offended by them for they weren't offensive.
But maybe you're not who I think you are? lol. You could have cashed out and sold off "ChgoCPA" at auction for all I know. A few hookers I know would've loved to put you out of buisness. lol.
Perhaps you should take a gander over to the CDC website and take a look at the rate of HIV in heterosexuals.
You're out there fucking people that you don't know, an hr at a time. I don't care if you're fuckin' 'em in the ass, in the "vag" or in the mouth. You are assuming risk.
Is it more risk? less risk?, just the right amount of risk? All up to you to decide. But, if one of your tiny hats happens to break when you're fucking that cute college coed persona, you have don't have a fucking clue what might come of that. Maybe you'll be fine. Maybe you won't. In P4P, an ass is an ass is an ass.
I'm a hooker so I should't be casting judgment here? Yepper sugar. Maybe you should try your own advice.
But a VAG isn't an ass. There is different risk. It's not opinion. It's science. Or is science above your pay grade?
And I'm not fucking them an hour at a time. Maybe you didn't hear. I slammed this broad so nasty Saturday night she got pissed I didn't take her up on the OTC time she kept offering.
Look into that carrot when you get a chance.
And not only do I not care, even the slightest bit, about who you slammed last saturday night, science is actually well below my pay grade
You were attacking something I wasn't saying. Apparently, reading is above your pay grade too.
who might have fucked a TS provider, you need a reality check.
You have absolutely no way of knowing who has fucked who, or how responsible anyone else is being. A provider who has fucked a heterosexual guy who engages in BB could be a greater risk to you than a provider who has fucked a guy who has fucked a TS provider, who always and only engages in safer sex.
we're all swimming in the same pool.
Then you're a homophobe and I bite my thumb at you.
Posted By: bonordonor
I have seen lots of reviews from hobbyist that see both. I don't understand the attraction to TS's, but if I had the attraction, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't write a review about the experience. Guys, Why do you write reviews on TS's? This is a P4P(ussy) board. I'm not a homophob, but it seems to me if your messing with a guy with boobs, you're a homo.
But anyone who doesn't think like me or see things my way is fucked up
Unless your name is Jackass Gallup
So any girl who plays with me is a lesbian! 
Yay!
You do have a point though..
This has been discussed before, and many women did chime in, and say they were concerned about the safety thing. That anal is proven to be more risky..
The study, is old, and has a flawed result though...
I mean.. Girls go greek..
A popular website just plagiarized an article about how anal sex is becoming a fad in many colleges..
It's hip to do it in the butt apparently. Anyway. My point is there are so many factors as to how stuff like AIDS spreads that just aren't taken into account when people do these studies.
Shit! Some of those studies studies use data collected in the late 80's..
So.. Safe sex is safe sex. It doesn't matter who, or what you are fucking...
If you are irresponsible.. You get burned. Gay, Straight, Balls, or chin...
While I don't have a problem with you labeling people like that..
I just don't think that way...
I know some pretty smart gay people, and they are very in control of themselves, and their lives.
Not a chance they would catch an STD. I can't just put people into categories like that
If I had said gay instead of homo would I have been perceived as not homophobic? Hell, I have friends that have friends that are gay.
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 5:20:10 PM
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 5:36:25 PM
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 5:40:49 PM
Try not to think of gay people as different people..
They are all around you anyway..
One of them may just be your friend..
Or you're Sister!!
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 8:34:05 PM
They don't really know why but they are.
And the OP is one of them. As well as a homophobe.
What he misses is that I guarantee he is only ONE degree from fucking a TS...and perhaps even a gay guy...egads LOL
I'll bet he's in the shower right now scrubbing himself...need to get that gayness off of him or he might be gay by tomorrow morning. What an asswipe!!
Posted By: TheHoundOfCullin
Try not to think of gay people as different people..
They are all around you anyway..
One of them may just be your friend..
Or you're Sister!!
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 8:34:05 PM
Just misinformed..
Lost souls that need guidance.
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 8:56:23 PM
He's an out and out hater...a bigot. Being a homophobe is all part of his life.
Posted By: TheHoundOfCullin
Just misinformed..
Lost souls that need guidance.
-- Modified on 3/13/2014 8:56:23 PM
Especially in this little world where we play. I'll bet you that if you peruse YOUR reviews (or any of the hookers you've seen) that you are simply ONE degree from being with a TS.
And for the hooker(s) to babble that they have an aversion to guys who've seen a TS is even more asinine.
I'll bet that assholes like you are still afraid that if they touched a person of color that that would rub off on you as well.
I get that you would elect NOT to play with a TS...but I'll bet you don't want a fat hooker, or tall hooker, or tiny hooker, or whatever simply doesn't work for you.
But to equate that a guy(s) who's seen a TS is at more risk is simply laughable. Like the tall, short, fat, skinny and so on hooker(s) is safe. Put a fucking rubber on moron!!
And yes...you are a pathetic homophobe (as well as a bigot, but you're far from alone)!!
Posted By: bonordonor
I have seen lots of reviews from hobbyist that see both. I don't understand the attraction to TS's, but if I had the attraction, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't write a review about the experience. Guys, Why do you write reviews on TS's? This is a P4P(ussy) board. I'm not a homophob, but it seems to me if your messing with a guy with boobs, you're a homo.
But tonight you are way off your game my friend. I'm not a homophobe nor a bigot. Not that I have to prove anything to you, but I love ladies of all colors, shapes & sizes that I find attractive. Since this is P4P, I can be very selective. So, I choose to see the ladies that, to the best of my knowledge, don't fuck with guys that fuck with TS's. That's the beauty of P4P
Your words belie your fear of gayness...you're a homophobe. Be proud and accept that. Even in your post now you simply show your utter ignorance on what this deal is in P4P.
YOU have NO fucking clue that nearly EVERY hooker has fucked a guy who has through P4P been with a TS. You are fucking delusional to believe otherwise.
And yep...that's the beauty of P4P. The illusion that the hookers love you and only want to be with you. As well they don't need to tell you about all the johns they've seen...and who those johns have seen...or the hookers that the johns saw over the years have seen.
Maybe time for another shower asshole...bigots like you need them to keep that gayness off of them.
This post is for those who actually are willing to understand this world...asswipes like you live in a fantasy world that fits nicely with your bigotry. Own it jackass!!
Posted By: bonordonor
But tonight you are way off your game my friend. I'm not a homophobe nor a bigot. Not that I have to prove anything to you, but I love ladies of all colors, shapes & sizes that I find attractive. Since this is P4P, I can be very selective. So, I choose to see the ladies that, to the best of my knowledge, don't fuck with guys that fuck with TS's. That's the beauty of P4P!
Would you ask her? In p4p, one can be selective about race, eye color, hair length...etc and these are all atributes that the ladies freely give out and are backed up by the guys that see them. In other words, they are verifiable.
But how would the "truth" re: her TS sex history status even be remotely, reasonably pursued? It would be as difficult as "knowing" her religion.
That's why your getting hammered. Stop digging. You're making it worse.
If you guessed P4P, you are correct!!! It is the only one that involves a PUSSY! It should be the only one allowed to be reviewed here. If they allow reviews of P4TS, then they should allow reviews for P4GA. I suspect P4GA exists, so why not review it here? How is it different, besides them not having boobs? Maybe that is why CPA hasn't written a review in a couple of years? BTW, I'm not a homophobe, I just play one on TER.
-- Modified on 3/14/2014 6:45:12 AM
Why wouldn't someone? Iva actually thought about this. A penis and boobs/beautiful feminine shape? What bisexual person wouldn't think that's not the perfect combo? It's an interesting thought, actually - and kind of intriguing.
-- Modified on 3/14/2014 8:05:23 AM
After reading the replies here I get the feeling this is like a very bad Jerry Springer Show.
