TER General Board

Wanna turn me on where it's at? ...eom..
Anon_from_NYC 285 reads
posted
1 / 25
LuckyIrishPrick 6 Reviews 253 reads
posted
2 / 25

And the only way this fucked up fantasy is going to happen for you. No, I'm only kidding!!

Good thing you used an alias because otherwise your inbox would be bursting at the seams! I'm sure they're going to line up for miles to take advantage of this offer!

They won't mind the morning sickness and mood swings! Nine months of passing enough gas to heat a 4 bedroom home through a winter in Alaska, is no big deal! There will be irreparable damage to their body, but so what, they get to graduate to MILF status! Incontinence...so!?!? They can add water sports to their fetish list! And there is no joy like carrying around a child that they'll have pried away from them at birth! Women are so emotionally detached anyway! Being laid up for near a year is a dream come true, they'll never miss an episode of Oprah! And I'm sure their family and friends will totally understand why they're carrying your trick baby and won't judge at all.  

Of course Invitro and surrogates are too mechanical and impersonal. But we never experience anything like that with providers! You need rapport, absolutely! And what better way to gain rapport than by raw dicking some random chick you found on an escort review site! I wish I had thought of this. What better way to determine a good a gene pool than using sexual attraction as your criteria! The baby might have a half-dozen genetic disorders, be dumb as a rock (thanks to you), but it will be fucking HOT! Do thigh-high fishnets come in a size 2T?

You are a genious, you figured it out - some things money can't buy, but for everything else, there's hookers.

thinking_outloud 182 reads
posted
3 / 25

Posted By: scoed
Please don't breed there is to many stupid people in this world as it is.
I'd rather live in a world with "stupid" people than with people who force their moral ways on others.

thinking_outloud 1145 reads
posted
4 / 25

Would any provider be interested in this if I can offer upto $100k ? I understand you can use surrogate mothers and In vitro fertilization. But that just sounds too mechanical and impersonal. At least you can pick someone you are sexually attracted to and have some kind of rapport with.

I know there are a bazillion issues with this, but is the basic idea feasible?

PopcornAnyone 266 reads
posted
5 / 25

Not the responses, but the final tab.

casinostocks 7 Reviews 195 reads
posted
6 / 25

Would she be allowed to provide while in pregnancy or will she have to sign a contractual obligation not to provide? If the latter, I reckon that she'll have to lay off providing for about 8 month pre-birth and 2 month post birth. Therefore she'll have to lay off for at least 10 month. If so, purely from an economics stance, your $100K means that she is getting $10K per each month that she is not providing. It is not unusual for a top provider in a major metro city to make that kind of dough in one week! Therefore, unless you are planning to couple with an average type of provider in some less vibrant market, you may need to reconsider your budget for this asinine proposal ;)

Ambivalent_Provider 259 reads
posted
7 / 25

I would probably consider it for what I make in a year. Most reputable, attractive providers make way more than 100K in 10 months. Also considering the opportunity cost and losing figure (i.e. stretch marks and baby weight), 100k wouldn't cut it.
How much is the going rate for being a surrogate mom anyways?

Ambivalent_Provider 144 reads
posted
8 / 25
Alborada_Del_Gracioso 254 reads
posted
9 / 25

at one time i was discussing an exclusive relationship with a lady. she quoted me a figure of $200K for a year. since you are paying for 9 months = 3/4 of a year the lowest possible value would be $150K. this assumes that after delivery you take complete responsibility for a child which she never sees again and that there are NO medical expenses involved. so even $175K is too low.

then there is the upsell potential: medical complications up to and including loss of her livelihood, she decides she doesn't want to give up the baby, all sorts of issues.

surrogate mothers and in vitro fertilization are surely less expensive.

now nothing is impossible. it is not my taste to try what you are suggesting. but if you want to avoid embarrassment forget $100K and start at $200K. i am sure a shrewd business lady can find more reasons than i have listed why you should pay more.

MP67 11 Reviews 289 reads
posted
10 / 25

Please, someone post something totally idiotic tomorrow night?

I'm off Friday, and I'll be sure to give you the full attention you deserve....! ;)

Alborada_Del_Gracioso 206 reads
posted
11 / 25

i do an excellent idiot imitation, i'm told ;-)

SerenaSinful 189 reads
posted
12 / 25

She'll be out of the biz for at least a year, taking into account recovery time and time spent working off any baby weight. And I am assuming the $200k is profit and that you'd be covering her medical expenses as well. Don't forget the stretchmarks & uh...sagginess, that frequently come with a baby; she will not want to have to lower her rates or take a reduction in income because of such things, so you may need to compensate for corrective procedures to restore her to her pre-baby body.

Coxucca 142 reads
posted
13 / 25
DaBabyDaddy 163 reads
posted
14 / 25
Alborada_Del_Gracioso 179 reads
posted
15 / 25

on the contrary i respect folks who take into consideration all the risk and lost opportunity costs in a transaction from all sides. the OP is only considering this from his own POV and needs a dose of reality to see how inadequate $100K would be. thanks for your added factors to consider. there are others that might be purely individual. inconveniences to one's personal life might need to be overcome with a higher base price, for instance. the many reasons for upsell in a transaction of rhis sort are ligitimate IMO: th eprovider doesn't get to take a potty break for herself from the pregnancy does she? ;-)

SerenaSinful 239 reads
posted
16 / 25

Posted By: Ambivalent_Provider
I would probably consider it for what I make in a year. Most reputable, attractive providers make way more than 100K in 10 months. Also considering the opportunity cost and losing figure (i.e. stretch marks and baby weight), 100k wouldn't cut it.
How much is the going rate for being a surrogate mom anyways?

Adoptions via an agency are going for about $30k, although some are quite a bit more. This is including attorney fees for both sets of parents, the birth mother's medical costs, and social workers' fees.

I can't help but wonder what one would tell a child in that situation....

Dad: "Families are all different, honey. Some children are conceived by artificial insemination, some are adopted... Your dad paid a pretty lady to....uh, well, to have you!"
Child: "Huh? So did you even date her?"
Dad: "Well.... sorta...."
Child: "How'd you two meet?"
Dad: "Uhhh..."

scoed 8 Reviews 171 reads
posted
17 / 25

the dumbest person in the world. My guess is both. If you had two brain cell you would see how totally unfeasible it is. The risk is very high for both you and the lady, the pay would barely cover her loss of income, it is immoral to set out to deny a child a parent and that is what you are proposing, and it would be cruel to the lady. But if you can't see it, I guess there is little point is showing it to you as you must lack the IQ of even a rock.  No provider or anyone else with a brain would even consider such a ridiculous offer. Please don't breed there is to many stupid people in this world as it is.

johngaltnh 6 Reviews 179 reads
posted
18 / 25

That the younger a woman is when she gets pregnant (within legal limits) the healthier the offspring; and many providers fudge their age by a decade or even more.

Alborada_Del_Gracioso 120 reads
posted
19 / 25

stupid people and moral authoritarians.

MP67 11 Reviews 127 reads
posted
20 / 25
MP67 11 Reviews 123 reads
posted
21 / 25

Please regale me in some fucking idiocy....!

Alborada_Del_Gracioso 178 reads
posted
22 / 25

i guarantee it is really really stoooopid

MP67 11 Reviews 116 reads
posted
23 / 25
Alborada_Del_Gracioso 120 reads
posted
24 / 25

it took me a while to get a good idea. work interfered. will post tonight though.

dblhappy 43 Reviews 119 reads
posted
25 / 25

Posted By: Alborada_Del_Gracioso
stupid people and moral authoritarians.
This is basically a redundant statement.
;)

-- Modified on 10/15/2010 10:29:39 AM

Register Now!