Now that "T.E.R." is back in the U.S., most likely for good, there's no reason why the site can't be IMPROVED, in various ways.
Perhaps the biggest peeve for me is the RATING system. On "paper," it makes sense..., if you bother to read the descriptions behind the numerical ratings.
In REAL life, NO woman, "pro" or "civvie," likes to be known as a "SEVEN," no matter how well intentioned the rating (as I learned the HARD way, via a "well intentioned" review, years ago 
)
So, the whole numerical system is due for an UPGRADE/change. We're talking about actual human females here, not the latest software upgrade, or the latest computer chip, so while "7" might be a GREAT rating for the latest "Intel" chip, not so much for the common "pro."
Second, they also need to overhaul the policy of not being able to give a "pro" a HIGH rating unless certain GRAPHIC "details" are included in the review.
Such a requirement is relatively RECENT. I don't recall that being the norm years ago, when I initially became a member, and ultimately, such a measure is counter productive all around.
For one thing, many "pros" are DISCRETE in their services, and would rather remain so, rather than risk it for a HIGH rating. On the other - good, decent, quality "pros" are NOT being acknowledged as such because the requirement to offer graphic descriptions prevents a "monger" from giving a "pro" the appropriate rating.
"T.E.R.," even so many years after its founding, with competitors popping up left and right, is still an INVALUABLE service to many in the "community."
I hope it can REMAIN so, but that would entail listening to its "audience," and making those occasional upgrades to reflect the needs/desires of the "community" at large.
Please feel free to post any other additional changes "T.E.R." could make to make this a BETTER service...
Would like to see a screen of most recently logged on for each area
Gives an idea who is active rather then many who have reviews many of which can be fake
Helps providers especially those who do not have the necessary 20 to make the top 100 lists
Seems to work on other sites moving an add forward
-- Modified on 2/10/2020 8:16:48 AM
But what does the NUMBER of times a "pro" logged on MEAN to anyone?
That they are an ACTIVE participant on "T.E.R.?"
And?
help guide mongers, not assuage the insecurities of providers. With that said, many mongers are inconsistent in how they use the rating system, but you are also right that no woman likes to be labeled a seven, six or five. To reconcile these competing interests, I use the numerical score in my reviews to indicate how a girl lived up to a mental compendium all of the girls I have seen in the past 11 years.
It works like this . . . .
7 = Below average
8 = Average
9 = Above average
10 = Top 10 percent of all the girls I have seen
This allows me to stay consistent over the years. Even if the overall quality shifts up or down or time a little, the shift of what is average is negligible. This way, I NEVER have to give a score below seven. Its enough for me to say she was below average. No need to beat her up with a five.
"C.D.L." gives a cogent, informed response?!
I guess what they say is true - ANYTHING in this life is POSSIBLE! LOL!
Seriously, your "system" poses the same issue as the current "T.E.R." system, in that you have to refer to some kind of "guide" in order to understand what the various numbers MEAN.
Numerical ratings should be user friendly and OBVIOUS, so that if someone is labelled a "7," ALL of us would agree that such a "pro" is mediocre.
The other issue is that if you want to quantify a "pro" as a "10," you NOW have to provide those graphic "details."
I don't know if YOU do provide such details in your reviews, but I personally try NOT to, for a couple of reasons -
1. I recognize that a session, good or bad, may be a matter of "YMMV," so what occurred with me may NOT occur with the next guy, and
2. I assume were ALL adults here, not kids getting their rocks off. If I say a session was "GFE," you should have a good idea of what went on (another reason why the term "GFE" needs to be better defined), and there should be no NEED for me to elaborate. Honestly, there's only but so much one can do! 
"Graphic" descriptions, IMO, should be reserved for more NICHE "pros," i.e. those that provide BDSM, or those who allow "trips to Greece." In that instant, it pays to be more clear and SPECIFIC as to what the "parameters" of a session are. All other sessions, you should have a good idea of what's in store WITHOUT having to go into "specifics."
and can't remember the four levels I suggest, then you are right, you will need a written guide. Most people wouldn't.
By not providing details in your reviews, you make them worthless to other mongers. Many of the reviews devoid of details like yours are fake. Obviously writing a generic review that could fit ANY provider listed on TER gives the reader absolutely NO information to decide whether or not to see a girl you have reviewed. So raises the question . . . . why are you even bothering to write reviews that are not useful to anyone? Is it just for the free VIP to save a few dollars a month?
Even many reviews that give details are sometimes not helpful because reviewers, especially the younger ones, make the review all about themselves. I try to structure reviews to say what I said or did and what the girl's response or reaction was to it. The most useful info is how a provider conducts herself during different activities. The reason is that some guys like BBBJ more than anything else. There are subsets of specific activities that make up a BBBJ that would be of interest to some mongers. Other guys like great DFK, so rather then just say she had good DFK, why not share her kissing style and what it was like to be there with her. The same thing holds true with different sex positions. Reviews with no intimate or personal details like you advocate might as well be no review at all. A large number of the reviews like this are just outright fakes. If you're going to write reviews, you should give enough details so that another monger knows you actually did see her. Saying its "private" and you don't want to talk about just sounds like a lame justification from a guy writing fake reviews. Just my take.
I never said one shouldn't provide DETAILS, I'm just arguing what TYPE of details should be REQUIRED.
I'm not arguing that reviews should be NON-descriptive, bland descriptions of a generic meeting between a "monger" and a "pro."
I'm just feel that the CURRENT system practically FORCES you to reveal PERSONAL details if you want to give a "pro" HIGH ratings. I shouldn't have to be REQUIRED to say that "Jane Doe" "swallowed my jizz after twirling it around with her fingers and massaged it into her face" in order to give her a HIGH rating.
I'd rather say the pro provides an "exceptional" GFE, just in case that "activity" was LIMITED to just me and her.
Besides, if someone is REALLY interested in the "dirty details," you could always use the "PM" system.
Isn't that one of the reasons it EXISTS in the first place?
to say, " "Jane Doe" "swallowed my jizz after twirling it around with her fingers and massaged it into her face" in order to give her a HIGH rating, " BUT . . . . . there are guys here who would rush to see a girl with a move like that who would NOT see her if you simply said, "exceptional GFE." This kind of detail not only helps a girl who has great moves during a session, it gives the reviewer more cred that his review is real and not a fake. Unless you're going to be posting under your REAL name instead of Lolo, how does it become personal? Sex customers are driven by reviews more than anything else. If you thought the girl was exceptional, why wouldn't you want to help her business by writing a review with sufficient content to attract other customers? The lack of details helps neither the girls nor their customers.
... I have to LEGITIMATELY correct you.
The "nobody" you're referring to are the "powers that be" here on "T.E.R."
On more that ONE occasion, I've had a review REJECTED simply because it wasn't graphic ENOUGH.
I was essentially FORCED to amend it if it was ever going to be posted.
As to whether a "girl" would prefer to have such details EXPOSED in order to "help her business?"
I think we should allow, and welcome, ACTUAL "girls" opinions on this.
MY experience with "pros" has been to the CONTRARY, in that they would rather I NOT share GRAPHIC details in my reviews.
that TER, which has a pretty low bar as far as requiring details, has rejected your reviews for not enough detail. Most would consider that a wake-up call, but apparently, not you. You will continue to write reviews that have all of the red flags of fake reviews. That is you choice, but then goes back to my question of "why write them at all if you and the TER mod who approves it are the only ones that are going to read it?
Like I said in my PREVIOUS posts, I was advised to REVISE my reviews to include MORE details if I wanted them posted, so I did, and DID get them APPROVED.
I just didn't go into the GRAPHIC detail typical of a "Penthouse" letter, but enough to pass muster.
As for "FAKE' reviews, those are actually EASIER to spot than you'd think. I normally look for someone who has FEW, if any others posted, and has SCANT, not limited, details.
Those tend to be from either "promoters," or the "pros" themselves, looking to BOOST business (and sorry, but the Asians are NOTORIOUS for this).
advocating here for LESS info in reviews, even though you admit having yours not allowed due to a LACK of details.
As far as spotting them, it has nothing to do with numbers. There is a guy with over a hundred reviews that has not seen more than a dozen providers for real. Spotting them is all about knowing what to look for in the content, and those with a lack of details like you are advocating would just make it more difficult. The more detail the review has, the more likely it is that a FAKE reviewer will not get some of those details right. Hence, they are easier to spot. Once I have determined a reviewer in my area writes fake reviews, he goes on my "Do Not Trust List" and I don't bother to even consider what his subsequent reviews have to say in deciding whether or not to see someone.
It seem YOU are the one with the comprehension problem. I have been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and not call you "dodo," but your appalling lack of knowledge about the business is going to push me to fall in line with the others when you double-down on your idiocy.
The part that morons don't get is that there are groups that are a lot bigger than TER that are allowing non explicit reviews. Explicit reviews are all TER has to sell. Anything less and TER goes dark for good.
Maybe TER can become a non profit for the people who want socialize here. LOL
"other" member of the "crew." Three-part harmony, or so they think.
... "great minds THINK alike?"
Yeah, they remind me of THAT, except the OPPOSITE of "great," or "think."
LOL!
6 = Below average
7 = Average
8 = Above average
9 = Fantastic
10 = BS
The 10 doesn't work unless someone has a rather large sample set -- which would suggest no monger should be able to give a 10 until they have X reviews. Then we can argue about what X should be and why it is so unfair to those who don't review often and crap like that.
The question about personal consistency is, while highly desirable for those attempting to use the review, is also a bit problematic when considering more than 5 years I suspect -- as well as during the first year or so for most.
It's not a perfect system and I suspect most mongers who complain are those dreaming that they can do no homework and get great results rather then realizing they need to put effort into not only finding and evaluating the information from the provider but also any reviewer whose review they are using for a decision.
"Ratings" "are" "overrated"
"Slow" "down" "on" "the" "quotations" "dude"
... you didn't get the MEMO.
I DON'T give a FUCK what YOU, or anyone else, thinks about my grammar/punctuation/spelling, etc., and neither does ANYONE else.
Now, my OPINIONS...
Several posters have called you out for your barely intelligible posts.
As for your opinions, some of them are valid, others kind of stupid, just like most other posters on this board. It's your inability, or refusal to write posts with shouting or putting half the words in either caps or quotes that make your posts so fucking annoying. I simply skip over most of your posts because they look like they were written by a five year old, and I am sure others do the same.
... to SKIP over my posts, "GaGa."
Most of your "contributions" are IRRELEVANT to the discussions at hand anyway, so you're skipping over them SAVES me the precious seconds of my life having to read and acknowledge such piffle.
Later, "LOSER!"
back to being "GaGa's" BITCH, I see. (smh...)
Must be a SAD, EMPTY existence for you "boys."
Hey, at least you have EACH other to keep you WARM at night!
to personal attacks? It always happens when you are backed into a corner by a counter-argument with no way out.
Awh, "C.D.L.," it WARMS my heart to see you protect one of your "bitches."
Good lookin' out, brah!
each other, aren't they? We call the three of them the "crew." Don't let them fool you with their insult ploy. That is their first line of defense, when they have no clue how to reply to a post. Unlike normal, sane posters, who would just move on with out a post, these bottom feeders lead with an insult.
Have learned their insults are actually evidence of them looking for a father figure. They come out in the open, in their feeble way looking for validation and acceptance but just do not know how to approach a viable topic of discussion. So, they insult.
Let's be patient and see how long they keep this up. Sooner or later they have to get the picture.
Unfortunately, it seems these LOSERS have no LIFE outside of these boards.
Heck, I still remember their LAME asses from back TWO years ago, when I last posted on these boards, and subsequently STOPPED, due to the level of discourse I found, and STILL find, here.
I'm just here now to "poke the dog," but I'm on my way out, AGAIN.
I've given up on having any MEANINGFUL dialogue while "GooGooGaGa" and his fellow group of societal REJECTS run roughshod over these boards.
It SUCKS, but what are ya gonna do?
Eventually, it gets tiresome dealing with this level of STUPIDITY and IMMATURITY.
Let the LAME dicks have it ALL to themselves.
One of them feels his entire life is defined by his posts here. So sad. But if you read what he writes, definitely a reflection of who he is as a person and it is not good at all.
Gave him all the counseling I had time for but I think he needs something a bit more intense, like maybe shock treatments. Many of them.
I make a point about you always resorting to personal attacks when you’re being bitch-slapped, and the you do it again in your very next post. Not too perceptive are you?
returned from your nervous breakdown. How are your shock treatments going? Have a feeling you will need the maximum voltage available. You are one loony tune.
Still disconcerted that some continue to use aliases? I believe your "crew" member, Jack is revisiting his decision to use an alias so he can get back in your good graces. Please do not be too hard on him.
Oh and by the way, you "making a point" is as remote a possibility as a snowball chance of surviving in hell. Try to be serious for once.
I don't even need to respond. You lose again. Thanks.
Thanks for the LAUGH, brah!
between a substantive debate argument and me pissing on his shoe. Not too bright, is he? Wait . . . . how would YOU know with your nose up his ass? Maybe we should start calling hin "Ounce", for "an-ounce-of-brains?" What do you think?
What's truly enjoyable is sitting back and watching you self-destruct with petty little personal attacks laced with lame schoolboy epithets you apparently never outgrew. The brilliance of my strategy is that all I have to do is keep prodding you to post because each and every one serves magnificently to cement your reputation as the annoying village idiot. It really is a case of "heads, I win, tails, you lose," because, if the ridicule heaped on you causes you to post less, then all the forums are better off as a result of your absence. But, if it causes you to post the same, or more, then each post simply digs you deeper into the hole of irrelevant stupidity you've dug for yourself. In the final analysis, it truly matters not a whit what you do, you are forever branded as a perennial loser in the same way the Coyote will forever lose to the Road Runner. (Beep, Beep)
"Reputation" amongst WHOM?
Amongst YOU pack of "losers" (by which I'm solely referring to the "usual suspects" on here, and they KNOW who they are)?
Do you honestly think ANYONE else on here gives a @#%$ what you "GEEKS" think of them?
Damn, you guys must be even more DELUSIONAL than I thought.
No, what will eventually happen, unless the "powers that be" step in, and enforce a modicum of CIVILITY on this board, is it DEVOLVING into a LAME "circle jerk" type affair, where the same "circle" of LOSERS only end up interacting with each OTHER, since NO ONE else can stomach interacting with either ONE of ya'
Keep it up. That's where you, and sadly, THIS board, are headed, "buddy boys," unless things CHANGE...
history of this board, you would know that new people coming here with an attitude like yours, full of themselves and thinking they everything about P4P with their 17 reviews in 15 years are considered the losers by most members. Some are just too civil and polite to tell you, so they just put you on ignore. Guys like you are insecure and crave the attention. Having people put your posts on ignore is like a death sentence.
Maybe you just need to get laid. 17 times in 15 years seems pitiful to me. And that's only if you actually DID see them. Your reviews have many of the red flags of fakery. That's why you are advocating for allowing FEWER details in TER reviews. Fewer details helps to cover up the fakes. I think TER's threshold for details should actually be higher.
... the "HARD ON" you and your little crew of fellow LOSERS have for me.
It's like my handle pops up, and you all immediately get "WOOD."
I don't get it, but I guess in THIS world, there exists ALL types.
Wonder WHAT you're gonna do when I stop appearing as REGULARLY?
Go pick on your local ADOLESCENTS, cuz that's about the limit of your INTELLECTUAL capacity?
I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself, but again, NO ONE, but no one, cares what YOU or the rest of your LOSER crew think about US.
The rest of us have RICH, full lives that don't involve coming on boards TROLLING others.
I'm just come on here to verbally "joust" with you cuz I find you and your little crew of LOSERS mildly AMUSING, the way a CAT finds a ball of YARN amusing.
The BAD news, for both YOU and your "crew," is that, EVENTUALLY, I will TIRE of you as well, the way the cat TIRES of playing with that ball of yarn.
Then..., WHAT are you and your crew gonna do with your SAD, EMPTY lives?
Trade "tips" with each other on how each of you has "GAME?"
HAHAHAhahaha...
You didn't address one point I made including no denial that my suggestion that your reviews are fake. At an average of one FEMALE provider a year, a hardly call that a "rich, full, life" unless you see so many trannies that you use you annual vacation to let your butt heal. When you say, "us", who are you referring to, you and Once? I don't see anyone else here aligning themselves with your POV on much of anything.
You are shaping up to look just like Once, who name-calls every time he has no substantive argument to anyone else's debate points. Its pathetic how little ability you have to go toe to toe with the guys here on a debate. Instead, you tuck you tale between your legs and start calling them names. You should think about laying low until you can represent yourself better, lest you dig yourself into a hole from which there is no escape.
but, AGAIN, I find myself in the position of making it clear to this KNUCKLEHEAD that NO ONE, absolutely NO ONE, cares what HE or his "minions" thinks of us.
If your BELIEVING so gives your SAD, little life some sense of PURPOSE, so be it.
Just so it's stated EXPLICITLY, here, in BLACK and WHITE, that NO ONE on here gives a fuck what YOU think of them.
I hope that EVENTUALLY sinks into your obviously THICK head.
Otherwise, you're COMPLETELY hopeless... (smh...).
Or are you just DECLARING yourself king and everyone here are your subjects? How arrogant and egotistical can you get? Do you really think you speak for EVERYONE here? That's what you're claiming when you say "NO ONE" here gives a fuck, . . . . etc. Maybe we should ask the other members here, both providers and mongers, if they have elected YOU as their "voice" or are you just disrespecting all of them by taking it upon yourself to speak for them? You don't make many friends here when you try to impute YOUR opinions to other members. Most here are too civil and non-confrontational to call you out for it, but some of us will, as you are experiencing. As Jack said, you learned nothing from getting run off the NY regional board for being the same dick that you have become here, did you? It seems you just can't help yourself.
Despite all the attempts to give you some constructive criticism, you continue to do things that will make yourself the most reviled poster here. Right now, BPos has the well-earned title of most reviled, but you are working hard to overtake him. Get a clue and get over yourself. You're either a low-volume monger (unless you include the trannies) with remarkable little knowledge of how the P4P business works, or just a keyboard jockey writing fake reviews and pretending to be like the other mongers here. Which is it?
You have "reviled" and "stupid" confused. dodo isn't the most reviled but he may be the most stupid. Bps isn't stupid but he IS reviled. Get it?
but then after I reflected on his chances of still being here by the time the votes were cast, I came to the conclusion that OPJ has a better chance of being on the ballot for POTUS come November than lolo has of still being here come December.
That said, lolo is more annoying, and stupid of course than "reviled" and BPS as you say is not stupid, but he is reviled. I guess lolo's behavior is easier to forgive, after all a person can't help being stupid, OTOH a person most definitely can help being not just mean spirited but downright mean.
when you get a free moment from "JERKIN' it" to the reviews on here, put down the LOTION, and open up one of the history textbooks from the junior high you apparently ALL go to, and turn to the chapter on the 70's, and the administration of President Nixon.
He ran, and won, by identifying, and speaking to, what he called the "SILENT majority."
Supposedly, these were those people in the GREAT middle, people who didn't PROTEST, or raise their voice.
No, they just went about their lives, while those on either side of the spectrum made a fuss.
Regardless of POLITICAL affiliation, yeah, I kinda feel like I speak for the "SILENT majority" of people who come on this site, read and post reviews, and SOMETIMES, attempt to participate in OPEN discussions on these boards.
But with BOZOS like you "runnin' the show," that quickly loses its APPEAL, as it has for ME, and they go on about their lives.
Have at it, LOSERS.
Like I've said before, must SUCK to be you.
Oh, and again, for the record..., NO ONE cares what YOU all think of them.
Good day, boys.
but unlikely to be around here long enough to get all worked up about.
Except for your "Random Capitalization Syndrome" nothing you have said or done here is particularly unique. I doubt anyone will even notice you are gone any more than they miss an annoying fly buzzing around their head once they finally get around to pick up the flyswatter and dispatching it.
BTW when you make dozens of posts claiming "NO ONE cares" it pretty much proves that you care.
SOME "people" on here LOSE their minds over my use of "CAPS," but some d-bags post LARGE memes, and THAT'S cool?! (smh...)
GaGagger. If he cares to take liberty with your alias, you might as well take liberty with his. Turnabout IS fair play.
Yeah..., but WHAT could "GaGaGooGoo" possibly be "GAGGING" on?
Oh, wait... never mind.
Hey, "GaGaGagger," I heard the way to solve your "problem" is to start with SMALL cucumbers, at first.
Lube em up BEFORE using, of course.
Then, when you get the HANG of it, you gradually move up to LARGER and larger "cukes" til that GAG reflex is gone.
Let me know how that works out for ya, brah!
I'm sure SOME on this board are ANNOYED and put off by your taking up precious SPACE with your use of space hogging MEMES.
But do you see ME complaining?
You do you, brah. You do you.
......Free time on TER for writing reviews. This would decrease the amount of total bullshit reviews and I think this would be of benefit to both providers and clients.
... except I think the "powers that be" on here look at "free time" in exchange for reviews as a "loss leader," like in retail, whereby you have POTENTIAL clients writing said reviews, getting FULL access to the site, and then, perhaps, converting those "potentials" to DEFINITE members, so that, ultimately, it works in "T.E.R.'s" favor to maintain the "free time" system.
why would people write reviews?
Then there wouldn't be enough content for any rational person to pay to access. Moreover, how would new content get created? Most people either want to pay or write reviews, but not both.
