There is so much confusion on the subject and contradiction on the subject it is scary. A lot of reviewers and ladies are frustrated with how thing are now it is not funny. Now to be clear I have not ran into problems myself as every review I have written has been posted, yet I seem to be in the minority. TER needs to be more open with their policies on reviews.

I asked once before, but from a history of other websites ...

Sometimes new owners come along and think it's easy to make money from the cash cow without having to take care of the cow or do any work. They often raise fees, ignore maintenance and let the place go to hell and the site soon dies. Someone posted that TER raised the membership fees by switching to Euros.

I'm seeing some of these hallmarks.

Does anyone know if TER changed ownership or management recently?  

Couldn't agree with you more...

Time to look for a new review site.

I now that GaGambler is in Las Vegas this weekend.  Who wants to encourage him to accept bets on when the review database exceeds 700,000?  It's only 150 or so away.

Some people think all admin has to do is sit around and read/approve reviews.

They don't get paid for it in the firstplace, but goddam if they have to drop their shit to make sure you give some lady a 6/7. If they're lucky.

Slippery, I dig you. And I'm sure whatever field you work in has processes. It's no different here.

You're talking with a guy that was a process owner and did audits as far as ISO 9002 is concerned.

You gotta have a certain amount of patience as far as this is concerned. This thing we do, I mean.

By no means is it rocket science, but in the same respect there is such a thing as time constraint.

The people have to eat and sleep at sometime. Don't you?

All my reviews are published. It just sometimes takes a while before approval. Just follow the guidelines and be respectful.

My only complaint is that I have to fill the whole form even if there are previous reviews. As a guy who could whip up a similar site with few weeks effort there's a bunch of changes I'd like to see. It would be nice if people could vote on the reviews how helpful they were. Forums should be post moderated as sometimes it takes quite a while before your post is visible. Also the community can be used to flag inappropriate posts.

this site is a joke and the reviews that are posted on it are taken to be true works of fiction and the review's content is not to be trusted.

Others outside of this site know how the reviews are manipulated by the so called staff so no one believes or trusts what is written in them.

...but I know why; because there was no adequate or uncoded link to their ad or web site.  It's a rule, I get it and have no problem with that.  With another review that was rejected, the reason was clearly stated, I edited it and it was approved in another day or so.  I don't dispute that others have had problems and perhaps the feedback on rejected reviews needs improving, but in my admittedly limited experience it hasn't been so bad.

I have to say I have had no problem with my reviews being approved. My first took less than 8 hours. One took slightly more than a week. I am waiting for approval of one now. It has been about 12 hours since I submitted it. I have mentioned elsewhere that one was altered by staff but was returned to it's original state after I questioned why the change. "They" really had no explanation, just a mistake.
  The one problem I did have was the staff created a new profile for a lady I reviewed. The problem? She already had more than 80 reviews and there had been no change in her situation and a new profile was not needed. Once I notified them they had it fixed within a couple of days.

but this time with no reason,  I have had 2 other rejected but they gave me a valid reason, fixed  them and they were posted.  This time was a write us and ask why.  so just waiting

-- Modified on 2/7/2011 8:33:42 AM