Just curious as to why there are no discussions and hardly any reviews regarding the women
post's on sights such as P   D or Tr     yst ?  Literally no reviews at all.   In the past there were reviews
for sites such as these but now they are non-existent.  What gives?

Lots of reviews for gals on Tryst and a lot of gals who have delisted here are on Tryst but have a no review policy  
Their other site you reference isa reviews it’s so can not be linked.
That being said a number of “Ondate” adds are pulled from said site .

Maybe it depends on the area.  Here in DC, most (but not all)  of the girls on Tr  yst are reviewed on TER.  I always go TER to do my research, prior to reaching out to the ads.

and therefore, PD ads can't be linked to a profile. If that's her only venue, she can't get a review here.

My TER friend here wrote me a review on PD. I don’t use that site. I prefer TER. I don’t want to be on lots of websites. PD & Tryst are not worth the $ in my opinion, but again I am not a high volume person. We are all different & have different needs.

How many are willing to take the  chance of seeing a non reviewed provider ? I may have once or twice over the past years when I was in a jam. Mostly no reviews is a no go for me. How do others deal with this ? Thanks in advance  

You post is not clear.

 
To me it seems like you're asking about reviews of those other sites??

I’ve done it 2x in recent years.  First time was horrible… so stupid ass me tried again. I ended up finding a girl I’ve been seeing for years. She’s great.

…as long as you cross reference the providers with TER.

Tryst has an excellent filter that you can use and anyone that tickles your fancy can be checked here to see if she is reviewed.

The issue with Tryst, as told to me by a provider, is it is too easy to get a profile up on there and their “verification” is too easy to circumvent, so you have a bunch of OF models advertising…but they can easily by screened out with the filter.

For that matter, TER has an excellent filter in place so I don’t know why you are not using that?

I started a topic on providers with no reviews. The general consensus was that they probably want to retain their privacy as they have civilian jobs, or straight up don’t want their encounters being broadcast because they might adjust their rules based on the client.

For example, Client A may be morbidly obese and smell like BO even after a shower, but he is a regular. She may not do BBBJ or missionary with him because of that.  Client B is a track coach built like a Greek God and she is also physically attracted to him - she may do the BBBJ and let him do missionary.

If she had reviews, Client A might complain that she sucked some other schmuck with no cover but not him…

Don’t get me wrong - she can run her business as she sees fit and if she has a lot of clients without reviews, then why change it?

Tryst is an ad site. You're always going to see a much higher percentage of not reviewed ladies on any ad site. There are fake/scam ads, delisted provider ads, and rotating new provider ads. There are a healthy amount of newer providers that come and go into the business. For various reasons, not every lady who enters the provider world stays in it long.

 
Only a small percentage of clients review. And, those who do review are much more likely to look for reviewed ladies when deciding who to see. For this reason, it can take time before a lady gets her first review.

 
That said, I find a decent amount of ladies through Tryst that I am able to cross check with TER.