A recent thread suggested it was a problem if a guy took more than a half-hour to reach orgasm, which kind of got me thinking about myself.
When I was young, it seemed all the effort went into postponing the pop and now that I'm approaching 60, there often is some anxiety about whether it is taking too long. (Youth is wasted on the young, as they say)
I think it generally takes me about 20 minutes of direct stimulation after light foreplay (though I've never actually timed it). Is that too long? Do providers consider it a burden? I've never had anyone mention it or refuse to see me a second and third time, but sometimes I do feel that the lady is "working" harder than she might want to.
Thoughts?
That may be why we go to professionals.
If you pay for at least an hour then 20 minutes sounds reasonable to me.
Then again it is not me that you are on top of.
Professional grade for a tough job!
I can only speak for myself regarding the subject of time. During each engagement, I make it my goal to ensure the man I am with has the best time possible. Therefore I don't mind if it takes 20 minutes or for the full time agreed upon. I personally like it when it doesn't happen so fast as women usually take longer, in the end we'll both be happy. You appear to be one who respects another's time, so enjoy!
~CarleeofArizona
in this area. My time with him is about him, and about enjoyment, and some things take a while. You simply do something else, keep trying, or whatever it takes.
Some things are about the journey, not the destination.