that i know of.

...Not even sure that such reviews are allowed by TER but others can correct me.

I'm not necessarily against reviews by female hobbyists but you have to remember that TER was set up for MEN to be able to determine what kind of service providers supply to MEN.  Your reviews won't tell me if they lick my balls or do deep throat.

As another hobbyist once said: "Just sayin'"

I have yet to have my first female client. I highly doubt that TER would even consider a female review section...just not enough women that participate and as one guy already said...this is a dude board.

Welcome Alicia!

So exciting to have a woman here! And I have been wondering the same thing. I have been considering hiring my first female companion and was wondering if I could post a review too!

So thanks for asking.

But I suspect the others are right... Might be a guy-only space.

I did come across a review site where ladies review male companions, but not where we can review female companions.

Her name is webterrorist, but unfortunately she has no reviews posted.

I met her once at a meet and greet in Vegas and found her quite the interesting person.

She hasn't been around for a while but if she is lurking maybe she'll see this and contact you by PM and let you know what she has found that works.

Of course you'll both have to be VIP to get PMs.

excellent idea..i doubt if the powers that be will go for it..we already have a transexual board..all we have to do is eliminate the dicks and we are there..

Ah…I’ve been on this board going on…5 -6, (more?)  years now. When I first arrived, I had no idea the level shit I was getting myself into. Early on I was regularly told that any women who ‘pays for sex’ must be flawed in some way. The only reason she would do so is because she had no other choice. She must be too----fat, ugly, fill in the blank, to even get a drunken mercy fuck in a bar.

Suffice to say, I’ve have had some battles on this board.

And, I have had quite a number of convos with women via PM, who had some interest, but were put-off/intimidated by the tenor of this board; and for whatever reason, declined to participate on any level.

Today? I’d have to say there is still no contingency of women ‘hobbyist’ around here.

And, quite honestly, I would have considerable difficulty describing myself as a “hobbyist”----for too many reasons to get into in this post.

All of that said, Welcome! I, for one, would LOVE to see a different perspective around here.

The general board is a full contact sport. Happy to see you were welcomed with at least some level of class...Don't expect that to last...

I think we would all love to see a few female reviews. That would give this a whole new flavor.

I would add though that if you are the first person to review a provider, once you answer the categories, they are damn near impossible to change. For instance, a female provider may do a session with you, but would not do a threesome...She may be into kissing you...but not a male client...and so on.

Having these categories filled out incorrectly, may cost them money, and or give them headaches during sessions that they don't need.

-- Modified on 9/24/2012 1:42:52 AM

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks everyone for the comments. Almost everything that was said has given me a better sense of how I should be tailoring my reviews. I just want to make a couple shout outs.

@sethric56 - Thank you for the advice about protocol. The comment about the categories is very helpful because I am aware that working with women changes certain dynamics about the providers profiles and I would not want my experiences to effect their work.

@hotplants – Thanks for sharing your experience on this site, I will definitely keep that in mind and I am glad to see someone who is on a similar page as me. Not to mention that your comments were also hilarious .

@Back_In_Black – Although I am not sure why, I definitely liked your comments and will be following you more on this site. And although I don’t think I should have to justify why I do this…not being attractive enough to get it otherwise (if that’s what you were implying about the hot question) its not one of them .