The tread below about more than one guy in a session raises some interesting points.  If rating scores are enhanced for BBBJ, really bi, more than one guy or anal, etc.  what if the guy doesn't ask for any of those point enhancers?  Moreover, what if she offers them, but he doesn't want to assume the extra risk or costs?  If an extra lady isn't there, how does he know in a single session if she's really bi?  One of those services at least, more than one woman, costs a small fortune.  

So guys, do you give her the points anyway if she tries.  What if she tries knowing from your previous reviews that you'd refuse?  

For myself, I've followed these rules, but I have read them rather loosely.  For example, the rule says anal, not greek.  So if you rim her, does that give her an extra point?  If she allows you to put a vibrator in her ass, does that count?  

Not in every session are two women present.  But if she's clearly bi and you could freely do locker-room talk with her about other women, does that count?  If you know she's really bi from a previous threesome with her, but in the current session none of that comes up, does she get an extra point then?  What if she breaks out the G on G porn?  I guess that proves she's really bi? Or does she get a half-point for bringing another girl, on the cheap?  Would a blow-up doll count?    

The other thing is, doesn't this encourage ladies to go through the check-list of the acts she must perform in the session?  I had a session with at least one lady who seemed to be doing just that.  



-- Modified on 10/29/2005 4:41:28 PM

I think that you must take everything with a grain of salt.  Though reviews are helpful in many ways, they are not a bible.  

I don't think that a gentleman should read a review and assume that everything listed is available to everyone at any time nor should he assume that because it's not listed, it is not available.  There are a lot of factors: hygeine, chemistry, health, comfort.

I also feel that providers should not over-extend themselves or do anything that they feel compromises their safety or health -- emotionally or physically -- so that they can get a certain type of review.

Also, remember that for every review written, there are probably 25 (or more) other clients that have not written a review and they may have had an excellent time or a horrible time with that provider.    

Not every woman has the opportunity to offer some of the services that may give them the highest review.  Everyone has a different clientele interested in different types of activities.  Why should that limit her?  Perhaps in her realm -- whatever her niche may be -- she is a 10.  

Best,

Kate

These aren't the SAT's you know.  Sure more offerings can be important, but what is the most important is how well a provider does with what she offers.  To that end, I propose that reviewers just consider how the experience made them feel.  If you feel like you are floating on air as you leave the place, odds are that you should give the person at least a 9, even if the activities were pretty basic.

I find that it is the attitude and attention lavished upon me that make or break the session.

the reviewer can give a point for the service
offered even if he does not partake.  Giving the
point is totally up to the reviewer.  The
offering of the service makes the provider
eligible for the point.  Jeez I sound like a
referee.

The new site review guidelines seem to have
changed the wording so it is not as clear as it
once was.

Not sure if that was intentional or not.

If a lady doesn't offer any of the "extras" she can only receive a maximum score of "7".

If a potential client is looking for a lady that doesn't offer those "extras" all of the ladies top score will be a "7".  So how does he then go about knowing if her "7" was a 7 out of 10 based on what she does offer, or if it is a 10 but weighted downward to a 7? If the body of the reviews do not specifically state it.

In the search fields are choices for all of the "extras" so if a client is  searching for a lady that gives a "10" greek session he can put in both those options...but if a guy wants a lady that doesn't offer any extras, but is of "10" performance...he's not going to be able to find that, because that lady, no matter how good she is at what she does is a "7".

I personally don't understand why there isn't just a 1 to 10 scale with the score based on what was offered  ie...she gave a "10" cbj, or the like.
A non-weighted score based on the exact peramieters of what occured seems more valuable than a system that obfuscates what a "7" or a "10" are.
But then again what the hell do I know.

You are right. The rules being what they are a lady that is an incredible date but does CBJ, LFK (or no K) and no DATY would not get a score that was in accordance with how the customer felt about his session with her.
A woman that has my standard for beauty and class will always rate a high score from my as long as she perform the basics. I often walk away from sessions with beautiful, classy women feeling like I am on top of the world, I have occasionally walked away from sessions with highly rated providers wondering why I wasted the time. Enjoyment often depends upon what we are seeking.
I do not have the time to check whether such polls have been done on TER, but it would be interesting to see the percentages of hobbyists that want DATY, DFK, and BBBJ in a session. My guess is that the majority of hobbyists do want those acts and the rules probaly were designed to give them assurance that they will get those acts in a session.

You still have to read the reviews...  for several reasons, but the most compelling is that TER does not offer much in the way of changing the ladies basic info,  and sometimes things change... and the info posted 2 years ago for an active file, may not apply to the same lady today....  SO READ THE REVIEWS

I just score from my heart, using the text of the rating as my guide line (e.g., "Forgot it was a service").

If TER wants to change it, that's up to them -- it's their site.

advice to ignore the rules and give what you think the session is worth is good. If TER wants to change the number they will. I doubt that they will change the rules as this is not a new issue and they've ignored it in the past.

I'm not convinced that reading the text gives a more accurate impression than the numbers. A case in point is Mimi. I saw her a couple of weeks ago. She is a very nice young woman, I had a great time, and I think her performance scores are warrented. However, she was not at all what I expected from reading the "Juicy Details" in the reviews. It was obvious to me that there was a good deal of what my wife (who teaches writing) calls "creative nonfiction" in the reviews. I repeat, this is not a negative statement about Mimi. Incidentally, she said she thought one of her reviews was completely fake.

Also, she said that reading her reviews embarrasses her. (She says that she doesn't have VIP membership but guys who do have shown her reviews to her.) She was very vehement that she did not want any more reviews on TER.

I feel that there is a high risk that the "Juicy Details" are going to have a significant negative impact on fresh young women like Mimi who are just providing in their spare time. If we lose them it is our loss.


-- Modified on 11/2/2005 2:54:42 PM

I agree that this is confusing and when I first started I think that I overinterpreted these "rules".  I know that I saw a lady that I gave a significantly lower score than she deserved beause the "extras" were not on the menu.  She was understandably disturbed because she was well aware that she had made me very happy.

I now just give the score that I desire minus one to each lady since I usually dont pursue the "extras".