The providers have a PO board and backchannels to discuss their review issues and their clients.

When they start to pay us, different story.

BTW, when I see a 7 amongst a bunch of 9's and 10's, I see a more honest review more times then not. I don't see a jackass, but I guess if you think like a provider you will.  

Insecure about what?
We pay them and review them. That is the purpose of this site.

Are you a N.O.W. member?

Forgive me if this topic has been discussed before!  I am new to this and am just curious.   I like to read through a provider's reviews before selecting a provider.  Occaisonally, I wll see a provider with the majority of reviews with 9's and 10's and one review with 7's.  I generally chalk this up to an outlier and think that maybe the client was a jackass and never connected with the provider.  

I know that a provider can white list a client but I am interested in everyone's opinon on whether there should be a mechanism for a provider to rate the hobbyist?  By the way, I get the fact that a hobbyist can work under different alias'

Thoughts?

check the reviewers history too. many guys dish out 10's like they're candy. I've only seen 1 10 in looks and had 1 10 performance.

when you get screened by ter handle, it creates a big disincentive for guys to give low scores when warranted.

a lady rates you by whether or not she'll see you again.

-- Modified on 8/28/2011 10:34:38 AM

Too many very insecure guys.

Sisters in Arms that work UTR always have...This biz isnt that Nu...I keep a Baseline on every Donor until he moves on..Why because if my Donors score me thru 5-10 for repeat business. No one like a Seafood dinner that thats Under cooked.....

they totally tell each other about johns.  stinky butt, big dick, laughs at own jokes, carries a barbie and ken to session, wants ken's head up his ass, breath of a thousand camels, whines about wife, GFE means pretend to listen and care, ignore impotence...fill in blanks...  you ARE reviewed, they are women.

No one gives a damn about the client's performance. All we really care about is that he's clean, pays, and isn't an asshole to the provider. If a guy gets rough or stupid, other providers need to know. But no, it shouldn't be a star rating system. Just a matter of "No, he's no psycho, go for it"

Doesn't anyone have any original shit to discuss?  Use the search function.

wake up

If you want the actual PP presentation, just google it, or you can watch the presentation on YouTube.

The link below has a video describing the incident.

........while it is limited, Date-Check allows the lady to "highly recommend", "recommend", etc.  While I am a member of Date-Check, I prefer P411, because the lady says yes, or no.  Every gentleman, and every lady is YMMV.  Sometimes, one of the party's is having a bad day, or they just don't connect, etc.

 One more reason for me to stay well UTR!

Hugs and Kisses

I love the ladies but they can review me when they start paying me, instead of the other way 'round.

Most references I give or get amount to: Did you see him?

What I think you are really addressing is whether the lady should be allowed to rebuttal the outlier review with "her side of the story."

I met one guy who had the personality of a serial killer, but he had reviews on TER. He had Camouflage pants and army boots. He looked like someone who would make a homemade bomb and blow up a federal building. And he had the smallest "little guy" I'd ever seen. How do you deep throat 3 inches? We didn't connect at all (because I was scared... lol) and on top of that, I didn't have anything to work with to show my "real talents." I was holding my breath waiting for a tepid review, but thank god, it never came.

No matter what guys say about the fact that they are the ones paying, how many are going to admit in their review that her "performance" had anything to do with their performance or personality or how they smelled or anything they did? That's too bad some guys think the oddball guy is the only one being honest.

Anybody can get a TER membership and start writing reviews. And the "non-VIPS" (read the majority of guys who see your review profile linked to your website when they visit it from your ad) don't have the ability to research the reviewer like VIP members can, so they take the review at face value and consider the reviewer to be an expert or why would he have the ability to post a review?

It's a one sided system that isn't justified by the fact that the guys are paying. Scrounging up a couple hundred dollars does not make anyone an expert on what factors contribute to a great session to even give a recommendation in the first place. So, no wonder providers check to see what kind of reviewer you are before she books you. Wouldn't you? We don't have any other means to protect our reputation, because, ultimately, it doesn't matter what we do. He's gonna say, what he's gonna say.

It would be great if there were some system for non-VIPS to easily tell which reviewers have credibility and which ones didn't. Like a colored star system with a new reviewer having a green star. Seeing and reviewing a certain number of ladies with a higher number of reviews would get you say, a blue star.

That's my two cents.

Make it a plus 2 to both. I agree as well xo

bad analogy

Millions of people love their seafood undercooked or completely raw. Ever heard of sushi? sashimi?

to make sure that they are honorable and safe.

That should be the only criteria of interest to you.

I don't think you should be rating clients by their sexual prowess.  After all, they pay you, not the other way around.