Write Review
1,980,942 Total Reviews 3,423 New Reviews
6,007 Users Online

TER General Board

There's a reason all those models I tried to build as a kid
Dr Who revived 1221 reads
posted

always had leftover parts.

I just assumed the manufacturer liked to have leftovers.

Instructions...just don't like 'em.

Care to share who you're the screener for?  I'd like to avoid as it's NEVER a good idea to have a johnnie boy seeing personal info of other johnnie boys.  Or is this something you are getting off on?
Posted By: GhostWriteroftheDamned
  I’ve been recently filling some of my economic down-time by performing “screening” duties for a busy provider.    
 This has brought me to the conclusion that less than 10% of modern male Homo-sapiens can follow more than ONE written instruction at a time.  
     
     Geeee’z; did Evelyn Wood forever cripple our ability to read and comprehend directions? No matter how simply, plainly or laconically the screening prerequisites are spelled out; the response is either total non-compliance, or a blathering autobiography of useless personal information.  
   
   Being a guy I understand the male ego, our innate indignation in being told how or what to do, and how our personal income level exacerbates the aforementioned. But you dudes could sure save a lot of e-mails and time, and be fornicating all the sooner if you’d only READ THE FUCKING INSTRUCTIONS.    
   
   
 

GhostWriteroftheDamned2276 reads

I’ve been recently filling some of my economic down-time by performing “screening” duties for a busy provider.  
This has brought me to the conclusion that less than 10% of modern male Homo-sapiens can follow more than ONE written instruction at a time.
   
    Geeee’z; did Evelyn Wood forever cripple our ability to read and comprehend directions? No matter how simply, plainly or laconically the screening prerequisites are spelled out; the response is either total non-compliance, or a blathering autobiography of useless personal information.  

  Being a guy I understand the male ego, our innate indignation in being told how or what to do, and how our personal income level exacerbates the aforementioned. But you dudes could sure save a lot of e-mails and time, and be fornicating all the sooner if you’d only READ THE FUCKING INSTRUCTIONS

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1222 reads

always had leftover parts.

I just assumed the manufacturer liked to have leftovers.

Instructions...just don't like 'em.

Care to share who you're the screener for?  I'd like to avoid as it's NEVER a good idea to have a johnnie boy seeing personal info of other johnnie boys.  Or is this something you are getting off on?

Posted By: GhostWriteroftheDamned
  I’ve been recently filling some of my economic down-time by performing “screening” duties for a busy provider.    
 This has brought me to the conclusion that less than 10% of modern male Homo-sapiens can follow more than ONE written instruction at a time.  
     
     Geeee’z; did Evelyn Wood forever cripple our ability to read and comprehend directions? No matter how simply, plainly or laconically the screening prerequisites are spelled out; the response is either total non-compliance, or a blathering autobiography of useless personal information.  
   
   Being a guy I understand the male ego, our innate indignation in being told how or what to do, and how our personal income level exacerbates the aforementioned. But you dudes could sure save a lot of e-mails and time, and be fornicating all the sooner if you’d only READ THE FUCKING INSTRUCTIONS.    
   
   
 

ReplyQuoteReport
GhostWriteroftheDamned1264 reads

and NO; I'm not "getting off" on it.

  Having your e-mails read, and the subsequent screening being done by a another male is not much different than having a male nurse, or receptionist, or secretary.  
Equal employment; it's the law.

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1192 reads

And you damn well know it  :(

So...why are you involved?

Just for the barter end...or do you have a different agenda?

Posted By: GhostWriteroftheDamned
and NO; I'm not "getting off" on it.  
   
   Having your e-mails read, and the subsequent screening being done by a another male is not much different than having a male nurse, or receptionist, or secretary.  
 Equal employment; it's the law.  

ReplyQuoteReport
GhostWriteroftheDamned1079 reads

Is every "agency" owned and run exclusively by "women"?

My "agenda" is to earn a few needed Dollars. Same reason some people go through years of schooling to shove an endocope up your ass.

Sorry to burst your bubble; but this is the internet. Any illusion of privacy is just that; an "illusion".

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1189 reads

And I trust that the hooker discloses this on her site?  That some johnnie boy is her "assistant"?  Nope...the johns sending their personal info in have NO fucking clue that another TER lackey is "reviewing" their private information.

Agencies don't hide this..at least the ones I am familiar with.  And I certainly have NO issues with a guy running it either.  BUT I know in advance of who is who.

And its an endoscope BTW....you many want to go back to school and get your spelling degree.  Or are you that sloppy with your hooker pals info as well?  Care to tell us who she is?  At least have some cojones.  Or has she stolen those from you as well!

Posted By: GhostWriteroftheDamned
Is every "agency" owned and run exclusively by "women"?   My "agenda" is to earn a few needed Dollars. Same reason some people go through years of schooling to shove an endocope up your ass.  Sorry to burst your bubble; but this is the internet. Any illusion of privacy is just that; an "illusion".
-- Modified on 4/14/2013 10:43:06 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
GhostWriteroftheDamned1251 reads

A simple typo and you're all about impugning and epithets.  

  Growthefuckup :D

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1089 reads

Rethink what you are doing...it's not good.

And I don't want to grow up...ever  :D

Posted By: GhostWriteroftheDamned
A simple typo and you're all about impugning and epithets.  
   
   Growthefuckup :D

ReplyQuoteReport
SinCitySinner1150 reads

Some guys who pretend that they didn't read the directions clearly, or appear dumbfounded,  could merely be trying to bypass the screening process, by providing the bare minimum information to see if it flies, or the provider (or the screener in this case) comes back asking for more...

Its an old trick..  

Now if you really want to test their comprehension skills, you need to put them in a room and give them a comprehension test.  

No hot women should be allowed to enter the room, as they serve nothing but distraction :D

-- Modified on 4/14/2013 11:00:53 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler1117 reads

or more accurately GFYTWYRIO!!! lmao

Do you really think that someone like me is capable, or willing for that matter, to follow directions from the likes of you?

Now follow this instruction and GFY!!!!! roflmfao

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1048 reads

My sister never had that problem...maybe women are better at men at something.

Still want to hear from the OP on why he is involved in screening....who it is for.  

I think I recall seeing this popping up just a bit ago on RO board...same character?

Dungman posted something like this a while back...didn't turn out too well for him either!

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1284 reads

or maybe a female assistant who is in the biz. what happens when john from the office who you can't stand, sends his info? you gonna keep quiet? doubtful. as to your post, guys looking at tits can't think properly. that's a no brainer. if this provider is that busy, maybe she should raise her rates vs hiring some john to do her damn work for her.

ReplyQuoteReport
AlfredReader1125 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1153 reads

no and that's the fucking point! i don't mind an agency (legit one) that is run my a male, but I do mind some random john screening emails on the sly. if a provider has an assistant, she needs to flat out say so, and not pretend it's her reading your emails.

ReplyQuoteReport
AlfredReader1031 reads

You have no idea if that "agency owner" is a pimp. a BF, legit, or not.

And for e-mail you don't even know the sex of the person reading and replying, much less the DNA.

Reality is when you've likely had a lot of your e-mails read by someone else.

But your previous post railed on about a man reading it.  At least now you admit it doesn't matter what sex.

You're learning.

 

Posted By: toofuckingstupid
no and that's the fucking point! i don't mind an agency (legit one) that is run my a male, but I do mind some random john screening emails on the sly. if a provider has an assistant, she needs to flat out say so, and not pretend it's her reading your emails.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1133 reads

once again for the clueless. if a provider 'told me' a fucking john on ter was screening her emails, I would not see her. just like I would not see a provider who told me she had herpes. what you and brain dead fail to comprehend is the 'knowing' part. if I don't 'know' its not the provider reading my emails, how can it bother me. put down the bottle. also a reputable agency with 20 girls is not the same thing as some john pretending to be the provider, and not the assistant. agencies, you know upfront your shit is not going to the provider. when you book an indy you are trying to avoid the middle man. hope that was clear enough.

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1235 reads

Do you think a female assistant who also works in the real world would keep quiet about the same situation? Bringing up the gender of the screener is a red herring, as is their client status. If anything a client is going to be quiet too, since they're screening for a provider and they have almost as much desire to keep it quiet that the provider does. Any screener with an attachment to the biz is going to keep quiet, regardless as to which end of it they're on.

I would be willing to bet there's a decent number of providers who have screeners that aren't otherwise directly involved in the business side, as well. You'd just never know it if it happened, and I doubt any provider would openly say it on these forums because of the way guys are reacting on this thread. It'd cause a shitstorm.

ReplyQuoteReport
perfectstorm1020 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1126 reads

Forgot to change my alias.

However, being somewhat new doesn't invalidate the logical argument. If I, as a client, am screening for a provider, and find someone at work that I dislike is going to visit said provider, the most I could do is say they failed the screening to fuck with them. Doing anything else exposes me to a whole lot of bullshit, which is why it doesn't really matter who is doing the screening if they're related to the business on either end.

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1082 reads

Let me know how logical it is when some BSC hooker or even worse, some BSC johnnie boy decides to "out" you.  Or try and extort from you.  

If you've got nothing to lose...no issue.

But too many here do have something to lose.  Stick around for a bit and you'll eventually get why having some silent TER john doing the screening is a really BAD idea.  Maybe you'll see this hooker the OP is screening for, ask her about those "sexy" emails and she gives you that blank stare.

Then you'll know she has a screener...and maybe it's our pal ghostswriterofthehookers....who now is jerking off to your "sexy" emails  LOL

Yea...it does matter. Do a search and read all about the BSC johns that have been reported over the years.  Or are you just another asshole that's been around for 15 minutes and knows everything?

Live long and prosper  :D

Posted By: weirdedout
Forgot to change my alias.  
   
 However, being somewhat new doesn't invalidate the logical argument. If I, as a client, am screening for a provider, and find someone at work that I dislike is going to visit said provider, the most I could do is say they failed the screening to fuck with them. Doing anything else exposes me to a whole lot of bullshit, which is why it doesn't really matter who is doing the screening if they're related to the business on either end.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler1214 reads

Has the possibility of some one just anonymously outing an enemy ever occurred to you?

and before you say the chances of that are negligible, I might add that very thing happened to me, and many others on this board. In my case, there were no ill effects, because I am "blackmail proof" but I am living proof that it can happen to anyone.

So please try to do a little less broadcasting and a little more receiving, at least until you stop being wet behind the ears, or you grow a brain, whichever comes first.

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1102 reads

If you're contacting someone who does not like you and wants to do you ill, they're going to do it, provider or screener. Anything that a client screener who happens to know you outside the hobby could do more than a provider places them in a personally compromising situation.

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived992 reads

YOU are just plain stupid.

And one day you'll be here crying how the hooker and her "pals" fucked you over.  Can you use this alias so we can pull this thread back up for you when that day arrives?

Posted By: weirdedout
If you're contacting someone who does not like you and wants to do you ill, they're going to do it, provider or screener. Anything that a client screener who happens to know you outside the hobby could do more than a provider places them in a personally compromising situation.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler1258 reads

The terms naive and stupid are not mutually exclusive you know. He could actually be both naive AND stupid. Let's not be too hasty in our rush to judgment.

but yes, if I were a betting man, I'd put my money on stupid.

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1112 reads

Name one instance where a client screener can do more damage to you personally than a provider. The circumstances have to be equal - if the client screener is employed by the same company as you, then the provider is as well, or they both know you from high school, etc.

I'm being serious - there is no circumstance in which a client screener is riskier than a provider  screening herself. You're resorting to personal attacks because you don't have a logical way of backing up the assertion that a client screener is riskier.

ReplyQuoteReport
Dr Who revived1130 reads

Your logic is simply illogical.

Slow down a bit...read the replies here.  Many of the posters here have been in this game a heluva long time and seen stuff that you simply refuse to accept as real.

No problem...Live long and prosper.

Posted By: weirdedout
Name one instance where a client screener can do more damage to you personally than a provider. The circumstances have to be equal - if the client screener is employed by the same company as you, then the provider is as well, or they both know you from high school, etc.  
   
 I'm being serious - there is no circumstance in which a client screener is riskier than a provider  screening herself. You're resorting to personal attacks because you don't have a logical way of backing up the assertion that a client screener is riskier.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1124 reads

are you really this dumb? a random screener does not have a name or review history! if someone says "Stacy's screener is a jackass and outed me" that person is not being reviewed, only stacy is! The provider can of course cause you harm, but you have the ability to hurt her in the process, by writing a bad review. You can't review a screener who you don't know! you can't blacklist a screener you don't know, and the thing you are missing is when some john does the screening the client did not agree to that! he agreed to talk to the provider, not her asisstant, pimp, booker, etc.  

you now have two people with your info. vs. only one. that is the point you are missing. Having two hookers know your info. is going to happen anyway because they talk, but some random john knowing that "toofuckingstupid" on TER is also John Smith in real life, just aint fucking happening.

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1188 reads

Now that's a legitimate, logical argument, but you're still reacting on emotion, because the situation isn't fully considered. That screener affects the provider's business. If you think a provider's business wouldn't be affected by a negative review caused entirely by a bad screener, you're wrong.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1304 reads

do you think smart guys want to blow money on the "what ifs?" you are kind of clueless. you can't give a lady a bad review for looks or performance because of what her screener did! are you high on glue? how can you drop a 10 to a 5 because of what a screener did? it makes no fucking sense! all you can do is mention "so and so has a screener who is a dumb ass" and guys are still going to see her, because many have no standards. you are the one going on and on about how good it is to have a john screening emails. are you doing the same?

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1010 reads

So, the screener being an asshole isn't a reviewable part of the experience?

I don't know abut you, but if I leave a review for a hotel, and the staff has an attitude at check-in, that gets reflected in both the text and rating.

If the screener is just an ass, that directly affects the experience with the provider. It's something they caused by having that person doing the screening, and by worsening your mood before you show up, it's probably affecting her score numbers even if you don't make a conscious effort to dock her scores.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1189 reads

you can put it in the comments, but you are a jackass to punish a provider for what some screener did that she may not even be aware of. bottom line, a third party makes things more complicated. most guys want things simple and having to go through a third party before they can even talk to a provider is not something they sign up for. you obsiously don't mind and that's great for you, but you should really stop telling other men what they should find acceptable. if they don't want to deal with some pimp, that's their right. do what you want and don't worry about what others want. do you like getting fucked with a strap on? many guys do. are you going to tell them they have no right to do that? same principle. you are drilling this thing home so hard, it becomes obvious you are not a newbie but possibly a pimp. what GUY takes so much issue with what other guys do? cpa is right. you keep digging that hole.

ReplyQuoteReport
weirdedout1276 reads

No, I'm not saying just being uncomfortable is a bad reason to avoid providers who have a screener. If that's your feeling, who the hell am I to say you're wrong - it's a preference based on feelings.

I'm saying that the idea that it's inherently riskier because the third party exposes a client to more risk isn't really correct, since any of the factors that make you vulnerable to a screener make you as vulnerable to a provider. It moved from there to the point that the screener is just as much a part of the overall experience as the provider, just the way an equipment manufacturer's online store operated by a third party is as much a part of the experience as the equipment manufacturer themselves.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1112 reads

it's obvious on so many levels that most clients prefer a female to deal with. even agencies who have guys answering the phone will tell you they get more hang up calls than a female answering it.

ReplyQuoteReport
toofuckingstupid1161 reads

you would still see her vs. she 'might' have it, but you are given no clues. i would not send my private info over email to begin with, so it would be done over the phone with the provider or not at all. I don't mind sending references to whoever, but somene who is a client has no business screening a providers email. that's called a pimp.

ReplyQuoteReport
Panthera121085 reads

Just because you are now playing Johnny Scheduler, doesn't mean that you have to be the hooker advocate of TER.
Starting a thread like this to curry favors from your new boss? You will never get your man card back after today. It's one thing to to "help" out a provider, but yet another to come on here and critique your fellow hobbyists. You should have went about your business and kept your mouth shut.    

I also have to agree with Curley. Those "forms" are invasive and I would never fill one out to completion. In fact, I would never even attempt to have my personal information in a storage unit on a hooker's computer where the information in not secure.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler1208 reads

but I WILL NOT beg to pay for pussy.

Anyone who has been here for any length of time knows who is responsible for that quote, but it seemed very appropriate to this thread.

ReplyQuoteReport
BossMonger1087 reads

Good point.  Me either.  I have my own personal blacklist for providers who make me beg to give them $$$ to fuck them. There are plenty of good providers in my area who screen but don't require a DNA sample.

ReplyQuoteReport
perfectstorm1123 reads

Very appropriate in this thread. I have seen that quote used on various boards several times by you and others. I actually thougth you were responsible for it, but since you are not claiming it, I am going to say LP might have been the originator. :)

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler1021 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!