BBFS is foolish, somewhat dangerous, but it happens.  BB Anal -- specifically cited in one of the threads below -- creates a very real threat of HIV and AIDs at least to the receiver.

Actually, BB anal is far more dangerous to the giver - to use your turn of phrase - than the reciever. The skin of the penis is highly sucsceptible to micro tears - too small to be seen or felt, but more than large enough for direct exchange of fluids.

For both parties, anal sex without a condom carries the highest risk of all for the spread of HIV. BB vaginal sex comes in a close second.

Anyone who engages in either of these in the context of provider/client is foolish to the extreme.

people delude themselves by bypassing facts to be able to justify whatever activity they wish to engage.  too bad there is not a course to educate people wrt the hobby... which is one reason I would want legalized prostitution.... for the education purposes alone.

I love the one's that go,"she's only doing it with me" or "I don't do this all the time".  Some people will simply make shit up to convince themselves that it's "OK".  These are the kind of folks who ultimately run into trouble.  I'm mean I guess it's fine if you understand the risks and you want to do it anyway and you expect to eventually catch something, then cool.  But the pollyanna-ish delusional behavior needs to go.

BBFS is dangerous and very stupid...many people have gotten infected with the HIV/AIDs virus from having unprotected straight sex ONCE....


 Everyone in this hobby should have respect for themselves and each other and wear a condom..and make sur ethe guy is wearing a condom.

 Its crazy..I have heard of guys being with a provider..and while being in the doggy posistion.the guy slips off the condom!!..Luckily the girls figured it out before he could get a bare ride.....LOSER!!!

 Hugs , Sidney Starr

... Described in your post...

However I must digress, most were not wearing a condom as they crossed the street either....

Many men have died during underwater-welding accedents on oil rigs. Yet the "risk-pay" for that occupation nowhere near comes close to a providers typical wage at the $300+ per hr. level... But there's a two year waiting list for a job interview to become an underwater welder... Hmmmm, could it be that providers often get their heads buried in a pile of their own self-rightous shit when they attempt to dictate policy from THEIR position in this service-industry?

(I agree with you that any man attempting to remove a condom when he clearly negotiated covered sex is commiting a crime against that woman! I just wish there was some mechanism of legal protection available to that lady! That is an issue of non-consent and criminally should be treated as such!)

-- Modified on 1/18/2007 8:27:40 PM

I personally am not being self righteous..just being smart..I value myself and my health and the least I can do in this hobby is use condoms  and get tested.  Its really common sense, an educated mind..and self-respect to just name a few.

 Hugs, Sidney Starr

. . . here named Mathesar.  He said that statistically speaking, protected anal is as dangerous for catching HIV as unprotected intercourse.

Also, when the under-water welder gets killed, he doesn't risk death and injury of the customer, too.  

Many more killed crossing the street-- you could reduce risk by crossing at the corner waiting for the walk signal, and waiting to see that the traffic has really stopped.  If you took out every common sense safety precaution everyone takes, I bet you could quadruple crossing-street casualties.  

Same thing with polygamous sex, BTW.  Unlike crossing the street, the higher the "casualty" rate, the higher the risk for everybody.  

-- Modified on 1/20/2007 8:54:40 PM