When the score is low but the description of the encounter is described as a wonderful experience, far better than than the mediocre score given. What does one consider when determining if this provider is worth meeting?  

For example, if a provider is very busty yet is a baby fat or a BBW provider. She clearly advertises as such as well as confirms this when arranging the appointment. A gentleman who is typically with slender women makes a choice outside of his norm to try a BBW because he really wants the huge breasts that aren't typically on a smaller woman. So the hobbyist meets the voluptuous provider, has an amazing time and says so in the review yet gives a low score, like a 6/6 only because in his mind a girl who is an 8 or a 9 is skinny. Is that unfair to the provider? If the encounter is described as a great time, a repeat and the service was described as going the extra mile shouldn't the score reflect that?  

This has happened to me recently, a 6/6 even though the encounter is described as much better because the gents stepped outside their norm of the skinny girl to see me because of my 40 EE's.  

Men who give low scores that aren't compatible with the description of the encounter…  does it do more harm than good to a solid provider?

END OF MESSAGE

It's a very faulty method.

I personally think the looks department should be based on if we look like our photos and the performance should be able to be a 10 so long as we provide all services that we advertise.
Who knows what the heck a 10 is in looks.
Some men have no interest in Greek or doubles, so why does that have to be a factor in performance.  

Not much we can do about it.. Hopefully the guys that want to see you are smart enough to understand this.

I always tell my girls to give their best, be professional, be the person you would like to be with..
If the review states that he had a great time with you though the score reflects otherwise, is understood that he may be biased by other girls he has seen (nothing against you) or that his grading scale may be different.  
Bottom line.. people prefer to see someone with consistent stellar service rather than the constant 10/10 that are typically a red flag and open the door to some thoughts.. nobody is always perfect…!!! but stellar service, professionalism, good disposition and solid track record (and mental stability of the lady of course) make up for a lot of things…
Dolly

Someone's 9 or 10 may not be mine.  What matters is the description of what happened.  I don't see why the guy would give you 6/6.  Sure sounds like he had a fun time, and then slapped you with the score.  

If you made the choice to see some one after looking at the reviews and pix, and then decide that type of person ain't your cup of tea, giving them a crappy score is total BS.  

Some types I go nuckin' futz over, some I don't.  No biggie.  But I'm sure not going to be a fcktard and insult somebody because they ain't what I like.  

I bet many guys are going to look at number scores way above or below the ladies' average and check it out.  Some guys opinions ain't worth dog dirt.

...many examples of this being discussed. My observation is guys note it's odd when the details of the review make it clear the session was much better than the score indicates. The advice given to those that question is don't just look at the scores read the details. The scores are not as important. I think you'll find most realize this. If you can check the guys other reviews you may find he is simply a tough scorer. I had a favorite once get a review with a lower than usual appearance score . The reviewer stated it was because of her short hair and her liked long hair. The kicker is he said he knew she had short hair before he made the appointment to see her.

Two experiences: last year I bookec a session with a woman that I thought was really hot. When she arrived, she was attentive, playful, liked to tease, great kisser, sultry and warm, the works. And she was a beautiful woman. Her reviews were good, and it was easy to see why. BUT, with me, there was no real chemistry. With a lot of men I'm sure she would find a good connection, a meaningful communication in and out of bed. But I just felt like I had picked the wrong woman. I would have had to give her high marks for appearance. And she didn't hold back on the performance, willing to do everything on the menu. But we just weren't right for each other. How would I have reviewed that experience? Would I end up giving her a 10/6? I don't know. She had plenty of reviews, so I didn't think she needed another. I simply couldn't figure out what would be fair to her and also give potential clients an accurate account of my experience.

The second such twister was more recent. I chose a provider that sounded somewhat different from what I'm usually attracted to. Several of the reviews stressed "bubbly" as the description. So by the time I arrived I had no idea what to expect, but didn't really have my hoped up. It was great! Flirtatious, playful, SMART! We DANCED! We laughed! She kept it real, not faking anything. Not pretending that I was some rock star stud she couldn't live without. But she seduced me anyway, and just the the FUN of playing with her was WONDERFULLY fresh! How could I have reviewed that? Would she tremble with passion for another man, even though it would be an act? I don't know. Had I had "better" encounterd in some of the positions? Definetly! But I wouldn't the memory of that evening for anything. And, btw, she was a KNOCKOUT!

So, I will see her again and if I have a clue as to how in hell I ought to review our next rendezvous, maybe I will. But if I related this encounter as it was, most men would consider it a wash, and they'd probably go on to the next profile. It's not really what men look for (or, how do I know, maybe it's EXACTLY what SOME are looking for) but...

So the description of the session can hurt a provider I had a great evening with, because even though I loved it...you get the picture. And the marks wouldn't jive with juicy details rap.

So, maybe one such experience account for some of the screwball reviews women get.

and that is when a reviewer with scores most women in the 7's or 8's finally posts his first 10, or when a guy who is a notoriously easy grader, someone like Turdwell for example who has given every woman he has ever reviewed a 10, when I see someone like him give a lower score, that would also make me take notice.

In your case, I noticed one of your 6-6 reviews was from a guy who almost always scores in that range, even when he is happy. I wouldn't be too worried about those scores. Most of us look at the text, not the numerical scores, although I will admit if a lady is getting all 6-7's in appearance scores by the easy standards of TER reviewers, I fully expect her to be a "woofer" IRL. Aside from that, the numerical scores are worthless numbers to most guys with much experience here.

I had seen a gent that typically saw skinny providers, he had even made a point to say that he preferred skinny girls in his reviews. I was worried to see him because I'm not sure why he'd want to see me if he prefers skinny ladies. I was afraid he'd give me a 5 in looks or something, or he wouldn't be attracted to me and give me a lower performance score despite my excellent service. I saw him anyway and just tried to cover myself a little more. He didn't review me (yet) and I'm wondering if he didn't because he didn't want to hurt my 7/9.

I had emailed one of the gents I'd seen after his review posted and asked him to lower the 8/10 because I hate disappointing people. I was overthinking things and was worried that gents would think I am actually an 8 and then run away when I open the door because he only watched my slideshow for a couple seconds. LOL I know that seems kinda ridiculous, right? Like, who doesn't look at ALL the pictures of the lady he's going to see?

I'm glad to have purchased VIP because now I can see what things are important to a gent before I see him, so I can be sure to do those things for him. And, if he likes skinny ladies, well I just pick out my lingerie more carefully.  BTW, DeeDee, you are absolutely lovely.

To respond to the 247 pm's you will get from desperate hookers looking to cash in on your cavalier rating system.  

You may bring up some of these gals average into the mid or upper 2's with your numeric generosity.

That's all you ever give.

Glad you saw (or claim to have seen...no review apparently) some gal a guy trashed....That's what makes you Capt Save-A-Hoe!

In my case I was not hiding. Id like to stay on point here as I am really appreciating the responses that are relevant to my question. Thanks to all who are posting their point of view on my post!

Once a liar...always a liar.

Nothing you say on here is to be considered honest.  

Thanks for posting again.  All of the gals are waiting and watching...you just keep on proving "us" right.

Now you are speaking on behalf of Hooker Nation as well?

How many johns a day do you see to make that statement?

If you don't have VIP and you write a review - you have NO idea what an appropriate score would be - because you haven't read a review.  You don't even know what level of detail is really appropriate.  My reviews have a lot more detail than others as it turns out.  A lot of reviews are written by people who don't have VIP.

I have also been very fortunate to have had sessions with REALLY good women.

Appearance Score - IMHO and others - absurd - there are pictures - are they accurate - yes or no.  You decide if that's a 6 or 10.

Performance Score - If you read the ratings (and you haven't read other reviews/ratings) - 6 is not bad;  if you read other reviews - it ain't good.  Another way of looking at it is that the TWO of you had that performance score.  Think of it like judging a dance competition.   IMHO - good sex is like dancing - you need to pick up your queues from your partner.  If you aren't having a good time - think about your own performance as well as your partners.

That being said - I don't pay any attention to the numerical ratings - I just want to know if the guy had fun and the girl was good at her job and reasonably corresponded to her ads.  Was she into it enough to be dancing - or just going through the motions?  

If you read the posts on this board, some providers seem to take ratings much more seriously than any of the customers do

who had anything less than an *average* of 9.0 after 30+ reviews.  usually it reflects earlier than 30 reviews. now there are certainly othfb who skew the review system and somehow bully guys to give her inflated reviews up to the brim...  but what I'm talking about is the other way around.  if the girl really is gorgeous,  it no doubt reflects in the review scores regardless of her tactics. the really pretty ones never need to inflate anything

it could be that my perception of beauty is in line with most people but either way TER scores are definitely not completely useless.  

have you ever seen a drop dead gorgeous girl who had an average of 2?  see why TER scores are not completely subjective and does have an element of objectivity to some extent. .

-- Modified on 5/7/2014 10:17:43 PM

Consider reviews as one mans opinion and when choosing someone, one has to decide for themselves. A seasoned hobbit will not be swayed one way or another by one mans opinion.

I don't normally, but reading that got me a little self conscious. I had gotten a nasty PM about a week before from some random guy responding to something I said in thread basically implying that men don't wanna see because they like the way I look but because my rates were so low (I've since raised them). Thanks for the thicker skin, asshole. Anyway, so that had been weighing on me too. Normally, I strut around naked with no shame. lol

Some games might be better than others. And when you bowl, you just try to knock all the pins down. You don't concern yourself with what you did right last time or what you did wrong. Not in any soul-wrenching way. You just have a good time. Of course, I don't go bowling very often, so...(here it comes!)... Maybe I'm not IN YOUR LEAGUE!!! (*rimshot*)