Can you imagine a site in which clients are reviewed by providers (with looks, performance scores, the whole shebang) ?

yep would be amusing... and keep the exaggerating down a bit...

TER: "She came like 5 times"

This would be too funny (and maybe sad at the same time)  I've often wondered how exaggerated some of the reviews are...like LFK is suddenly DFK; rimming is anal in the review; spitting is swallowing, etc.  

I created a little mock Excel rating sheet for look and performance (I didn't bother with the detailed "juicy details" section.) I tried to be as honest as possible (I gave myself a 5 looks and 5 performance) and think how my previous ladies would rank me; obviously I couldn't ask them as they would feel obliged to be much more kind and favorable than in reality if it was anonymous.  

They say honesty is the best policy however in this case I doubt it. Sadly a reverse review board would be rather boring with every guy scoring a fabulous 10 in every which way!! Honestly

I actually find that surprising...

... but not for the reason you gave. I think the vast majority of reverse reviews would be boring because providers would be describing Just Another Day on the Job. Consider... does a provider get excited about the thought of seeing a client, such that they can't wait to get it on with this gorgeous, sexy man?  Maybe in a few exceptional cases, but usually?  Are they describing what may be one of the best times they've had in a long time, maybe even in their lifetime?  Is the client someone who wouldn't give them a passing thought if they were to meet in the real world, or are they the stuff dreams are made of?  

But I believe the main pt would be for it to know a little more about who they are meeting and decide if they want to meet him. They would know if he's aggressive, friendly, hung like a monster etc etc and then they could decide if they want to make the appt.

Most of the time when guys are drinking with their male pals, talking about their exploits with women, the only action they are getting is at the table, circle jerking  with their Choleric  
  Drunkard club.
   
  Nine times out of ten, guys who are actually getting  action with Gals  in the real World  are not telling anyone about it.
 Only a fool soon to lose his fortune would tell other miners  his newly discovered treasure's  location.  
 
  Ninety nine times out of a hundred, drunks exaggerate and tell drunken lies.
  In the drunks defense, the sauced mind can't differentiate  fact from fictional drunken dreams .
 
    In defense of guys who write reviews about his  pay for play Gal cumming multiple times in an hour, those Gals are paid to be excellent  actors,  like Hollywood stars.
  Most Guys are as gullible as a drunkard's eyes at midnight when women are in the picture.  

but I doubt if anyone would be too interested with it.

Your idea certainly merits consideration, from a provider's perspective.  I always found it curious why TER doesn't include any feedback from the ladies during the review process.  She only see the review after it's written and there is no real way to confirm what was written actually happened.

on a site like Yelp, reverse Yelp. Imagine waitstaff reviewing diners. lol

If providers were able to supply feedback to reviews it would no doubt become a huge pissing contest and the reviews would become tied up with a lot of squabbling. I see it alot on the stripclub forums that I visit - lots of not very pleasant reviews that are countered by pissed off strippers defending themselves. It can get very ugly.

Agree completely.......as we cater to our clients....no matter the venue.......we are motivated to want to draw them back again.  Hence a provider WOULD have a strong motivation to inflate her review of a hobbyist.

I'm sure things could get messy to a certain degree depending on the circumstance.  Just wondered how things would be if there was a way for a lady to comment.  

Oh to be a fly on the wall when providers are sharing Intel about hobbyists!
It probably ranges from simplistic ("he/she is clean and not a serial killer or LE") to details about personal sexual preferences and physical attributes. OTOH maybe it's best that we don't know!

Reviews ideally. It would need to be accessible ONLY to providers and for their reference only.

Part of me would like to know, or be aware of what get's shared.  I know one lady I saw for several months did share some insight into my likes and attributes with another.  It certainly lead to a very memorable experience since she had that insight.

With a provider with whom you get along with, get her drunk at dinner, and start telling her hobby stories. She'll start sharing with you...then you'll find out!" what she thinks.  

Yes exactly, thank you.

If ladies used their real stage name to write reviews, we would be able to see who has too much time on her hands.

So then provider reviews should only be accessible by hobbyist for their reference only, correct?

For me it would mean a yes or a no as whether I wanted to meet him given the parameters you used. Could care less about his alleged prowess or his looks.

Might give the johns some idea of how some hookers really feel and their business would not suffer. Also "she" (the one who was telling it like it is), might be the next one he books and given the fact that her performance might be awesome, he would never really know what she is truly thinking or feeling.

The biggest site in the UK punter planet allows rebuttals to reviews. I think that's only fair.  

Very well stated.............hopefully all hobbyists will read this and take note.  Can see how, under the current system, hobbyists can go virtually unchecked.  There must be a way.

I think it would be awesome!