Stumbled on a blogpost that argues

My first ATF, who I probably saw 40+ times over a few years, was an incredible Non-GFE GFE. Her services were non-GFE but her service was GFE+.  Wait ... her menu was non-GFE but my time with her was GFE+++.

If the average guy was in good shape they would not need a bbbj to get a good hard erection. Many providers offer the service because they get higher rates for it. That is the only reason why they do it.

-- Modified on 2/15/2017 11:05:47 PM

The BBBJ has become pretty standard, so most experiences are eligible for an 8. If you book a duo, you'll probably have a good time and get at least one BBBJ, so doubles automatically qualify them for at least a 9. I still have never gotten a definitive answer if doubles affect the averages of the two providers or stand alone as an evaluation of the duo, so maybe that's a mote point.

If a hooker really, passionately hates TER, she will find a way to blame TER for all of her personal and client-related problems.  It's quite pathetic.  TER is not perfect (I can never give the high scores I want to in my reviews), but for the most part, TER lives up to its purpose of A)keeping us safe from LE, and B) giving us some research tools to find exactly what we're looking for in an encounter.  As for GFE, no one has ever been able to come to an exact agreement on what it entails.  It's one of those subjective things.

.... and look at it as a description of the actions taken in a session, the easier this will be. It's just a number!!!!
It's a total change in thinking.
As to GFE or non GFE labels. That's what the written reviews are for. To get an idea of the way the services are delivered. A beautiful woman is a beautiful woman. But, a beautiful woman with a great personality and great sexual talent is another thing all together.
My favorite providers show me in their actions that they appreciate me and that they enjoy our time together. Whether it is fact, which I would like it to be, really does not matter. They behave in a way that makes the journey with them really attractive to me. So, I repeat.

as opposed to "original meaning," for instance. I don't know what "GFE" meant in the first place, but so what if it's shifted from meaning "less business-like"  to "less business-like" plus "FS, DFK, DATY, BBBJ [or whatever]?" That change, if it happened, could have been for better or worse, but I don't see the point in characterizing it as untrue.  

Contender for SPOTY that is.  

So if a provider is mediocre, but you put it in her butt and get a bbbj-  That would be 70% of 9, roughly 7.

I vote we we keep TER mellow and informative.

be seen and not heard.  

The first is that you obviously don't know much about Chicken Little, MOST of the responses he gets are "personally insulting" and for good cause.

and he is just as much a Chicken Little under that handle as well..

I'd be a lady that falls under the GGT category as I like a bit of chemistry and a natural flowing date. My gent is my focus and I use my intuition to make the experience as good for him as possible.  
Its been years since I tried to incorporate all of the "menu acts" into the experience, because it simply felt fake to me. Or as you put it, mechanical. Also takes time away from what the gent enjoys most and isn't it preferred that a lady give more of what he likes? For some gents, a checklist can be seen as a circus vs truly enjoyable.

This is very well said and I think you completely get it.  
The scoring really isn't as valuable as the details left by those who convey the session well.

It's possible not everyone calculates it like an allocation though. Lol