I've often wondered if STDs truly had an impact on promiscuity in general. If no STDs existed, would people be fucking more frequently and with greater abandon? Would terms like "safe sex" be thrown out the window, since there was no longer such a thing as "dangerous sex".

I believe that those who think STDs serve a purpose in restricting the casualness of sex may be correct. But is too much sex really a bad thing to begin with? So long as birth control methods are being used, I fail to see the harm in increased sexual activity if STDs were wiped from the face of the earth.

Ain't gonna happen, especially when some of our beautiful ladies, fuck, "UNCOVERED"
Not only don't they care about you, they don't care about your health!!
To be honest, they only care about themselves!!!

If there is no STD's, there would be less use of a condom except for providers using contraceptives to prevent babies. Some providers may use a cover to prevent babies. STD's is the main reason why their are hats involved in vaginal sex IMO.

That is very disappointing news, indeed.

in a rush I get your post up...HA
Go get a job for fuks sake!

and it seems that it's to let all the "paid escorts", married Johns and all the rest of the human race know that they are all going to hell.  Kind of an oxymoron since MS is on here 24/7 and doesn't consider himself a degenerate as well   Oh...it's because he doesn't consort with paid escorts while he's in a loving relationship...yep...that's the ticket!!

But he did get his room cleaned up so his Mom is letting him play on the computer today.