But I think that's because the bad guys tend to pick on younger girls.
Some of my colleagues in my former profession would see providers and show each other videos of the intentionally demeaning things they do.  They also seem to get off on paying as little as possible/tricking the girls into extras.  So gross.

it depends on how narrowly you define the term....

as often as I see depictions of sessions in reviews that sound like teenage locker room stuff,  or reviews that are about the reviewer and are a load of self aggrandizing hogwash - and in both cases including juvenile references and the depiction of the provider as an object, I would say that there is more than enough of it -    

my experience in reading reviews is not however statistically significant

and I don't know if you would consider what I have described to be misogyny.    

I however, do....

a lot of posters seem to like to talk a good game of bros before hoes.   But I think many are just afraid of being characterized as a "mangina" - it's a peer pressure thing....      I do not equate this with misogyny unless the poster is routinely depicting or relating to providers as though they were objects....

the same percentage as in general society

If we can identify them both the misogynists can patronize the misandrists and they can have a great session of mutual 'Hate-fucking' together