I saw a provider a couple of weeks ago.  She had great reviews, body - nine, attitude - ten, etc.  Well, the reviews were absolutely right on on the attitude.  Easily one of the most sensual women I've been with.  I'm not sure I'd see her again though.  The problem was that my expectations were or this amazing body.  She was thin, but her breasts were, er ... well, they weren't "youthful."  

That wouldn't have been a problem if it hadn't been kind of a surprise.  I probably would have seen her anyway based on the rest of the reviews on performance, etc.  But my expectations were so high going in that I couldn't help but be a little dissappointed at first.  I'm wondering if that's really what the ladies want?

I'd love to see a system that would allow the physical descriptions to be updated over time.  Maybe an average of the scores?  I know that's not easy, but it'd be a start.

Curious what others think.  Curious what ladies think.

Yes!  I agree. There are ladies I see, who have been in the business for four, five, six years. Their appearance has changed, sometimes for the better. And you are right about the fact that both inflated reviews and variant opinions color our expectations when we see someone new. Also, there are performance issues. I know ladies who used to do greek or BBBJCIM but who have stopped, or do not do so with new clients. Their stat page needs to be updated to reflect this. This is only fair, BOTH to the hobbyist and the lady. Her future business can suffer from inflated expectations...

Members can fill out a "problem report" which allows them to update almost any item on the gal's original profile.

The main problem is that the first reviewer sets the first page forever.  I saw a truly exquisite lady in Chicago last December. She was listed as "athletic" but had lost weight and was then absolutely lithe. I tried to change things, but she remains listed as athletic. This is also true of the other items on the front even if the lady has evolved over a matter of years.  

-- Modified on 9/2/2008 11:34:05 AM

I wouldn't want that kind of a system and frankly the TER folks wouldn't be able to keep up with it.  If one reviewer could chnge teh listings they would bounce all over the place.  I'd be more interested in the averages, as that's a more reliable presentation of the data.

Just my two cents.

seems like more and more complaints are being stated on some of the boards.

That is in fact what the problem report system is for. It is used by many of us to update the profiles of the ladies that we see. There is no way to know if or when a profile has been updated since it was originally created-by the first reviewer of a lady.

Now, obviously we are on the honor system here. I don't make changes in a lady's profile indiscriminately and neither should any one else.  I have however updated many lady's profiles over the years-often times at their request.

The fact is the reviews themselves are much more important than either the number ratings or most of the profile.

Not quite.  Ladies have the ability to get information updated on their profile.  Note: rates change, ladies physical appearance changes due to a good surgon, etc.

Does anyone foresee a provider requesting, "Please change me from 'Average' to 'Baby Fat' because I gained 20 pounds recently", LOL?

It should be quite "doable" to re-write the database so that all the check boxes and drop down selectors that we are forced to fill in, get averaged over time.

The profile should list her most current description.  If it is not accurate, it should be updated with the problem report.  I even mention things in the General Details portion of my review if she looked different from what I expected.

An average doesn't make any sense.  How do you average her hair color?  If she decided to change her hair from brown to blonde then her profile should list blonde not an average hair color.  If she gets tattoos or piercings, you update her profile to reflect them.  You don't average it.

Some things like build are a matter of opinion.  Some guys don't want to say a girl is fat so they say she is average.  But the body types shouldn't be averaged and TER shouldn't be changing the profiles for this unless it is consistently different from the original description.  But this again is what the write-up is for.  And this is why they have pictures in their ads.  All you have to put in your review is whether she looks like her pictures or whether she is using old pictures.  If the pictures are recent, it is up to the reader to make his own judgment from the pictures.

If you search for a provider and in your critieria chose the number range for looks and then for performance it is averaged both of these individually are averaged.  That does definately exsist. So you can search for a girl who is receiving reviews in a average number range you feel comfortable with. Kendall

We are talking about things that have no number value assigned to them, like body type. The first reviewer sets that designation until an indiviual (usually the provider) convince staff to revise it.

So, once the body type is set, why make every reviewer select it again in their review process? I say why not use all those selections to create a average of what all reviewers judge the body type to be. The idea would work with other qualities and services as well.