and wondering if other might have the same reaction.

but it does technically meet the review guidelines. She “went the extra mile” by providing DFK, allowing the reviewer to bump her performance from a 7 to an 8.

It’s clear from the reviews this provider doesn’t work in a massage parlor.  And the rules don’t say that there’s a maximum score that’s less than 7 for a massage provider.  So that leaves open the ability for a massage provider who DFKs to get as high as an 8 (even a 9 if it’s four hands with some action between the ladies).

Agree that it's a gray area and that reviews in general are both grayish and subjective so this is hardly a big deal. Just probably better than a lot of the discussion on the boards recently as it might reduce the vagueness present.

Apparently kissing and "really bi" is just as important as actual fucking according to the TER guidelines for scoring.  

See no way the way the review is written that it does not allow an 8
A seven plus 1 for DFK - no need in any of the rules requiring conventional sex/
Had in the past been told  by TER that reviewer did not need to clearly state DFK in the narrative when mentioning kissing if the profile said it. Think at the time were so understaffed was easier to answer that way then to send it back to reviewer to clarify or correct.

Read the reviews, and don't stop at the numbers.

"Just probably better than a lot of the discussion on the boards recently as it might reduce the vagueness present."

Is that mongers who prefer fbsm are more likely to not share their +1 dfk or +2 dfk+bbbj experiences. Likewise, massage providers are more ymmv and reward regulars with extras but discourage explicit reviews, especially if they share space with other massage providers.

Similarly I met two providers who did bbbj even though earlier reviews had said cbj. I was surprised both times. One of the providers I had seen a few years earlier and it was indeed cbj back then.  So menus do change.

Makes you wonder if anyone is actually reading the reviews. The review linked below only talks about massage table services, whereas they were able to give her a 9 for performance...

Send in a problem report and I bet the score gets dropped to a 7.

No gray area. It’s black and white in the rules. No where does it say they have to perform sex. They are still eligible for the extra points if they perform extras.

In school,

To you.  As a provider I can say kissing is the number 1 thing people want; the sense of true intimacy.  

The extras needs to be stated in the review. Earlier on, I've had reviews kicked back at me because I gave a certain rating for performance but because a certain act wasn't mentioned in the review itself, I was not allowed to give said rating.

If you look at that review again you’ll see the performance score has been changed.

Was that supposed to be aimed at me? If so you clearly did not read what I wrote. I clearly said it was technically within the rules as written.

that give a great nude FBSM and will also DFK even if you only book a massage.  One of my very first FBSM sessions was a young black girl (like many guys,  I started in P4P with happy-ending massage sessions and within a few months was into CFS.)    If the skill set is there to earn a specific score on the TER scale, it doesn't matter what color she is, the mods are not going to drop the score for that reason.