pretty well in your review.

Perhaps Administration is concerned with making charges and opening itself up to a lawsuit.  That seems like a reasonable policy to me.

As for you, what were you thinking calling in security and opening yourself up to a charge of prostitution?

And why were you TOFTT here?

In any case, I commend you for warning us about this gal, but you needn't take such risks.

As for the 3-4 day lag in getting reviews up, this has been discussed a lot already.  The bottom line is that TER is taking their time to tighten up and research reviews more thoroughly so that phoney ones don't get through as often, which I also think is reasonable.

i think that the edited review is sufficient as warning, though. the details that you  included, now edited out, might have been open to he said - she said controversy.

by editing the review and toning it down a little i believe TER has assured the review will have more longevity. with more inflammatory but true detail the provider might have been able to apply pressure for its removal.

although these are all "works of fiction" TER undertakes certain risks in publishing them. so edits are necessary to preserve the review.

The more unemotional you need to make it.  It will be more likely to getthrough the screeners and less likely to be perceived by someone reading it as a vendetta.

Anyone who reads this review will know better than to book her.

Pardon me while I heartily guffaw. Where in the holy hell are you doing your shopping? Sounds like you scraped the deepest bottom of the gutter to dig up a crack head and her crew. You don't, like, expect sympathy do you? What was the agreed upon amount? $20 and a bag of chips?

Instead of indignation, hang your head in humiliation and slap yourself for even admitting to putting yourself into that position in the first place.