And the seller attempts to get you to

that TER will accept to allow you to take down a review or edit a review once it goes live.  The time to make edits is while it's in moderation.  The reason for this should be self-evident, but if you need an explanation, I will tell you.  If there are any glaring errors the mods will usually catch it and send it back to you for editing.  Capricious changes to a review are not allowed.  

I did have a provider very upset with a review I wrote.  I understood where she was coming from and I did change it half way to what she wanted.  I was a bit harsh on the scoring of looks, etc.  And she did put effort into the session, it just didn't go great.

He certainly has a Don Quixote mindset.

The horse has fully decomposed since it was beaten to death on the KGirl forum a couple of years ago, and now the rotted, decomposed bones are being beaten again, this time by rocket and a new cast of characters foolish enough to argue with him and think he'll be reasonable. It's really sad, but if past is prologue this thread will find it's way to the ash heap of deleted history like the old KGirl threads did.
.
Someone please make it stop!

It's very simple yet they keep on doing that. Why?  

So you caved in? I mean, if you felt that way, but would you feel the same way if she wasnt there to "convince" you?

She wasn't mean about it.  And I was a bit on the harsh side.  I do really think I was being a bit harder than I normally am.  If you read my reviews they are not all glowing.  I have given some very low scores when deserved.  I definitely don't pander to the keep the bookers happy with me crowd.  If they were good bookers their talent wouldn't give shit performances.  

So you're saying TER let you change it after it was approved??

One time I remember, was when the girl told me I put something in the review that could possibly ID her to people that were close to her. I put in there a civie hobby she engaged in bc she talked a lot about it during downtime, and I explained it to TER and they let me edit that, and only that, out.  
.
It was cool of them to allow it as it could have jammed me up with the girl in question. It was mistake I made when I was new, so I make sure those things don't ever go in reviews anymore.

Yes.  I also wrote a first review on a girl who then asked me to delete it.  She didn't want her profile up on TER.  Apparently girls can ask to have all of their reviews removed.  

If you say you made a mistake and meant to do something different, they may. I can see a difference of one in a rating being a slip of the hand. I don’t see them doing it if you say the provider asked you or you gave it more thought and changed your mind.

to the rules.  If you say something that could inadvertently dox a provider or put them at risk in some other way, TER is very accommodating at allowing removal of this type of information.  What they generally will NOT do, is allow you to ADD information that was not in the original review.  Score changes generally fall into this category, because changing scores, especially upward, after the review goes live can be construed as manipulation by the reviewer, the provider, or both.

that you are an outlier in the way you view the Kgirl scene.  95% of Kgirl enthusiasts don't agree with your view that the girls and the agencies are solely responsible for anything that goes wrong.  Newbies who fail to use common sense are the most common source for their own problems and challenges they encounter.  Your "consumer rights" bullshit is wanting to give every monger who crosses a line a pass for his own conduct. To you, most Kgirls are scammers and every booker is a bogeyman hiding under the bed.  Only the fuckups that have all of the problems are in agreement with you, and it's a very small percentage.   It doesn't take that much intelligence to follow the instructions discussed ad nauseum on the Kgirl board on how to become and continue being a Kgirl monger without encountering problems.  

Windmill encounters.

a voluntary delisting.  Any provider can do it at anytime.  Most common is when they retire.  Less common is when a provider is delisted by TER for a rules violation.  Either way, the only trace that may be left is if they have some doubles reviews with another provider who is not delisted.  

Only a couple of years ago. The subject was a well beaten horse corpse here years before rocket showed up.

And you followed through. Smh

This is the problem.

Imagine two different sellers

You need to stop with the overly aggressive force feeding what you think others should do. First, you know little about what actually happened and made lots of assumptions. Second, I’m not you and do not think nor agree with your views. Chill out.

Not sure I understand the inclination of some players to feel they have the obligation and calling to dictate to other adults how they should comport themselves in P4P generally or on this board specifically.

I EVER said it was okay for agencies to "harass" customers?  What I did say, is that it's perfectly normal for agencies to follow up on information they get from a girl after a session about a customer who was abusive and otherwise crossed the line with their conduct during the session.  How is that harassing?

You shouldn’t pressure people in life in general imho but to do so in an illegal activity is asinine. Qwordy really is clueless and can never ever admit he is wrong. Some people need to stay in their lane but when you are drunk with self righteousness, his car is everywhere but in his own lane.

I've read it as you removed the original review. This is my fault. Please accept my apologies. If the original review stayed, there is no problem. I assume you also said that she have you a freebie after you posted your first review?  

Lol, who said abusive or whatever?

I appreciate the apology. I did not include that she gave me a freebie in the review. I did not think that was a fair thing to share. Although she did this for me, she may not do it for others. Not only does me putting it in the review set up an unfair expectation, but others might intentionally give her lower marks hoping to also get a freebie.

You have no link and are making up shit again.  You also have no link to any reviews of "Tim's" girls in the past 7 years, yet you think he is my BFF.  You live in fantasyland.  He's famous for having some of the highest quality girls, so don't you think if he was my BFF, I would be seeing and reviewing some of them, even if it was just a favor for my "BFF?"    You bet your ass I would.  There are bookers that I still do business with, but he's not one of them.   I'm guessing you couldn't even get close to passing screening with him, so this little crusade of yours is retaliation, am I right?  Word in SoCal is out . . . . You're a dick and I wouldn't be surprised if you couldn't even get a session with a sheep down here.  Lol

Cdl once again peddling a fucking lie about why I'm doing this. He knew I've been shitting on bad actors for years and yet with this specific agency he made up a lie that it's "retaliation"

"Not only does me putting it in the review set up an unfair expectation, but others might intentionally give her lower marks hoping to also get a freebie."

I have helped a couple of girls move their incall, but not in association with this particular booker.  

You call people out all the time when you have no knowledge of what is going on.  You speculate galore based upon your perceived lack of knowledge and experience of your brethren just because they don't have reviews that you can see.  That doesn't mean they haven't seen them.   You lie all the time...

If you want cred from me that you have actually seen providers, pick a girl out of my review history THAT YOU HAVE ALSO SEEN, and I will ask you a question by PM that you would only know if you saw her.  If you get it right, it will be a start towards a little cred with me.   Otherwise, being on a review site with no reviews of your own, providing hardly anything in the way of information about any providers or the biz in general on the discussion boards, it's hard to not take you with a grain of salt.  Admittedly, it's an assumption and you MAY have seen a few providers, but based on the kinds of things you post, I would consider you a low-information monger with limited experience.  

Hahahaha   Cred from you?  Hahahahaha

Mr. irrelevant.  Do you see the irony in you talking about "tripe?"

I do, too bad you don't.  You made yourself the arbiter of all that is good or bad in the forums.  It's fine you think that.  Always accusing others of the same things you do.  Do as I say, not as I do. Living in your delusional fantasy land.

probably because very few other than me will engage with you.  Maybe you should post something informative from your personal experience on the cock-ring thread?  

Listen everyone has their kinks so I'm not gonna judge you... for someone who always judges people on number of reviews you don't have any new ones in over a year so I'm gonna assume you're the one booking sheep and you keep mentioning it.  

there have been a few dozen times where reading someone's reviews made me think they were fucking a sheep.  You're one of them.  The way you treat providers as described in your own words in your reviews, you could substitute "sheep" for the girls and still get all of the things you like in a session.   Then you just mentioned dirt on your boots, so we all know where you have been.  The fact that you even wear boots instead of shoes militates towards you being a sheepfucker.  
You're so baaaaaad.  Lol

I dont. But again, sorry I don't fuck barnyard animals or any nonhumans for that matter. You do you tho.  

"standing up" for the stupidest 5%, right?  The fuckups that can't follow instructions and get themselves blacklisted.  As long as you acknowledge who your constituency is, I have no problem with you pandering to them, but you should not be preying on newbies by telling them the agency scene is a rigged game because 90+% of the guys who patronize agencies have no complaints.  You're painting yourself as someone out for revenge.  You don't even realize that your bias is tattooed in every post you put up.  You have declared in your last sentence above that you are predisposed to ALWAYS take the side of mongers without any regard to whether they are on the RIGHT side of the question, or not.  

As Jeff Foxworthy would say, "Here's your sign."

".  You're painting yourself as someone out for revenge."

Don't even talk to the seller. Talk to the mediator. The seller isn't interested in hearing the truth,only in removing an unfavorable review so their business is better.  

LOL - it is getting to be far past humorous with your repeated responses to your own comments and posts. But whatever.