Friends
How is it ok for a provider to come onto TER, advertise her tours here on TER regional boards, flame a detractor, voice various viewpoints on the boards, and generally self-promote while at the same time having a strict “no review policy”??   Is that ok?  I (obviously) would not think so.  This is, after all, The Erotic REVIEW is it not?!?  I do not wish to name names but it just seems hypocritical, opportunistic, unfair, and wrong.  She seems legit enough with a long tenure of posting here,  a very professional and credible personal website, and credible-appearing ads up on Tryst, Slixa, etc.   BUT she charges high rates and requires deposits for bookings.  Ugh.  I’ve been hobbying awhile and never saw this pattern before.  My sense:  you got no reviews, you get no deposits.   To me this would be like going on P411 and trying to book a provider there only to have her pm you back saying she does not accept verification through P411.  
Yeah, no.  
Watcha think?  Is her M.O. ok by you?  Justifiable?  Or not?
Opinions please….

That's her profile.  Take it for what it's worth.  Obvi, you shouldn't see this nameless, horrible harridan.  And probably shouldn't pay attention to her posts, either.

I am just being honest with my own personal experiences with p411 & they do not verify if a person has a criminal background. No checks for our safety it’s our job to do our own vetting. P411 is very clear on us doing our own safety checks. P411 verifies your a human.  

No Problemo...!

By the way---What happens if someone actually violates her request and submits a review?  Do they come to her in advance for approval?

QueenBia
Not exactly sure what your point is.  P411 certainly is a verification site, just as TER is a review site.  That was the analogy I was making. Neither P411 nor TER are primarily advertisement sites, though both permit advertising secondarily as a perk to their members.  It is assumed that if a provider uses P411 as such, that verification there (through it) is acceptable.  My major point in my original post is that being an active, vocal member of TER should implicitly mean that providers who join it will be willing to accept review postings about them.  

Great question!  

There are more pressing issues here and in the real world to get excited about. Much like the whole "deposits" controversy, if you have a problem with how someone conducts themselves, move on to the next in line.

Why are Americans so bloody cowardly?
Go on then, name a name.

1. If you dont name the gal, you are just wasting your time. And ours.  

Americans? Bud if you are posting from anywhere in EU your man card just got got.

Luke
Wise, not cowardly, thank you very much.  I do not appreciate your gratuitous insult, which adds nothing to my post.  I’m guessing you’re a Brit based on your arrogance and your use of the word “bloody”.  Anyway, fly boy, if you saw how many megabytes of space on the internet this person at issue wielded in flaming her one detractor (whose deposit she kept after a cancellation), you’d understand.  See, years ago, when people read newspapers made of actual paper, Greener’s Law was coined:  “never argue with someone who buys ink by the barrel.”  I.e. don’t pick fights with the media.  Sage advice.  A modern corollary is that its very unwise to pick fights with people who carry out internet armageddon.  In my extensive searches for any reviews of her, what turned up instead was infinite internet excoriation of one particular detracto, across multiple social media platforms.  I would rather not be her second target.  That is all.  And that is wisdom, not cowardice.  

Its kind of being a puss to be honest. Unless you were actually negligent enough to give your real info...

Hey rockingchair
You should think before you post.  To your first point, you’re incorrect.  The issue (as a general principle) can absolutely be discussed without the specific example.  To your second point, you are just flat out wrong.  Providers can enforce their “no-review” policy via complicit moderators who will block and delete etc.  And regarding me being a puss, read my response to flyboyLuke.  
Now go back to your rocking chair, and try to think before you flame.

...and they frequently post both on the discussion boards and advertise.  Here is where the back channel is your friend if you're truly interested in seeing her.  If her actions, attitudes or financial requirements are what has your undies in a bunch, well, you're just going to have to get over that.  

Snafu
Excellent points, my friend.  Well said!  You get it.  
Carry on.

This is the first time I've heard this. How do you know such mods exist? While I suppose it could be true it really doesn't make sense in terms of TER's mission, which is to provide as many legit reviews as possible.

watch out, he'll assault your dog

Could you be any more pre-dick-table?

How is it a verification site exactly? They don't verify anything really.  

One, while many make the claim that TER is a review site as if it should only be related to reviews it's certainly been much more than that. Why would it even have a provider only board if it's was truly just about reviews -- or any of the discussion boards for that matter.

1. Im totally correct. You are coming off like a whiner.  

Jensen
You make fair points.  Thank you for your thoughts and thank you for not just hurling insults like some others here.   To be clear, I never stated that TER is exclusively a review board; my point is that it is primarily a review board.  Reviews are at TER’s core and always have been its essence.  Escort Reviews (and the need for them) are what gave rise to TER. All the other TER features like these discussion boards are add-on amenities/bonuses.  I am not exactly sure how TER moderators enforce ‘no review’ policies; but my sense is that they do and I don’t think that they should for providers who take advantage of relatively lax advertising policies and self-promotion opportunities here.  One way they could do that is to simply require that for a provider to post her ad on a regional board she must include a link to her reviews within that ad.  Wouldn’t that make sense and seem fair?   Literally tit for tat.

The best review one can hope to find is nothing less than a blow by blow, fully detailed review.  

RTR1
Much as I hate to say it, we agree.  There is tremendous value to TER reviews.  They are extremely helpful in our “screening” process of escorts.  So many flakes and scammers out there pretending to be providers.  I use TER reviews as my gold standard info source when considering booking some provider I have never before seen.  If there are 5-10 reviews that are generally consistent, that tells you a ton. That is “go to” info.  
See, the whole reason I started this thread was I saw an ad for a hot looking escort on Tryst, and considered booking her, etc.  But first I came here to read her reviews, and found zero reviews but found a boatload of her ads and her trashing of one guy (she aggressively flamed him using just his handle, thereby potentially defaming that handle).  Then I went outside TER to other sites, and again, no reviews, but lots of ads and lots of trashtalk. Obviously I did not reach out to her.  But it struck me that she is abusing TER.  Maybe she is following the letter of TER’s guidelines but she sure as shit is not abiding by the spirit of this site, which is fundamentally about escort reviews.  As I stated, I wanted to come here, raise the question as a general question while avoiding naming or outing someone who might just turn around and unleash unholy Hell on my handle.  That is all.

Ok ReadytoRim1
You want to dance?
Now pay attention:  
I came here with a reasonable point to make, looking for debate or various points of view etc., and to make a reasonable suggestion.  You and flyboyLuke just hurl insults, the way a caged primate in the zoo hurls its shit.  You’re like the fucking playground bully in kindergarten, aren’t you?  I bet you were that kindergarten brat, and you were probably the biggest kid in your class because you were held back.  I bet you bullied the smarter but physically weaker kids and also even the girls, just because you could.  Its really a damn shame your mother didn’t swallow.  But at least she’s content now doing what she does best……on her knees gettied bukakkied in Hell all day every day.    

Be a rule?  Who is your gripe with?  Management or the nameless provider?

I didn't even think this is possible.

...are getting way out of hand.  There's clearly some dudes in here getting off on either their fantasy telling of what they thought occurred or thinking we need to see how great they are in bed but I'd prefer they covered the details in a couple quick paragraph.  No Penthouse forum needed, we can watch it for free on any search engine.  

I do not think delisted providers can post  and supposedly are not be mentioned here.
To delist all adds needed to betaken taken down or that use to be the case.
It also used to be that any provider who posted an add could be reviewed-not being covered by something phrase or verbal comment to client that she as a no review policy.  
Have no idea why it should be any different with a provider when she posts an add that she can say I do not want reviews - what if Perkins said we do not want reviews ?
The mentioning of delisted providers definitely has not been in force forthe last few years.

ReadytoRim1
Let me add:
-  You are so unattractive to women, you have to roofie escorts.
-  The only time you ever got a pussy wet was when, as a delinquent child, you put a cat in a bag and drowned it.
-  But your history is so sad!  You once fell into a gorilla enclosure at a zoo……and the gorilla shot himself.
-  Although you claim that women have paid you for sex, ransom doesn’t really count.  
-  You are so hideously unappealing a person that when you go to visit a glory hole, the person on the other side wants to just be friends.

Ok ReadytoRoofie1
People here seem to like my counterbarbs, so here we go for another round….and remember, you started it, dickhead…,

Wow, you really take this seriously.  

Yeah i wouldnt spend so much whining about this shit and just go see a well reviewed gal.

“Whiny bitch, whiny bitch, whiny bitch”.   That the best you can do for an insult, dickbreath??  You keep saying it. Got no backup insults?  No repertoire of nastiness tucked away in your insect brain?  Just “whiny bitch” and that’s it?    
Well, Mr. ReadytoReceiveRectal1, allow me to respond in a way maybe you can understand….

True you don't say it's only a review system and agree reviews are a primary feature of the site that people value. I just don't see that as a reason to think a policy change is needed -- though clearly it's a suggested change you could promote (perhaps coupling with a post to the S&P board and requests for likes to signal user support to the admins) in the GD board for discussion and visibility.  

Its funny you took the time to type any of that.  

Ill take this into consideration but im making 0 promises

Don't change on my account.  Seeing one of your reviews is more than enough for me, can't stand seeing the hint of that on TV and I'm certainly not going to read about it.

Hey ReadytoRepulse1
The only way I knew people here on these forums enjoyed the way I slammed you was that they posted it and “liked” my jams.   So you can see that for yourself, moron.  To do that, though, you’d have to take a short break from your chaser activity.  Seems that you are pretty much of a full time TSchaser.  So go now, get back to it.  I’m sure there must be two or three chicks with dicks out there that you haven’t sucked off and rimmed yet, so, by all means, get back to yo’ chasin’ them TS hoes.
Buh bye biiiiitch

You have got to be the most thin skinned person to ever post here! If you’re not a puss, name names!

I think you liked those posts yourself. You take this so seriously i wouldnt doubt that you have a 2nd or 3rd account.

Oh wow. Looks like more people liked my post calling you a whiney bitch than any of your posts with your odd behaviour of grade school jokes and weak rebuttals.  

Hes totally a puss. And you are right, thin skinned.

The question should be: Is her M.O. ok by TER?
The reason a provider comes onto TER, advertises her tours here on TER regional boards, flames a detractor, voices various viewpoints on the boards, and generally self-promotes while at the same time having a strict “no review policy” is because no one has reported her.

It really musr be an interesting experience.

Well, people can opine all they want, or they can just read the policies, linked below for posting ads on the Buzz boards. But yes, anyone offended by such actions can report the use to the admins and they might remove the posts though probably only those that are argumentative or abusive to reviewers. Kind of guessing on that.

36363jensen
While I appreciate your thoughtful points, the policies you reference are definitely not enforced.  I’ve now looked at several providers who clearly violate the exact rules you cite.  They promote themselves on the buzzboards, but their advertisements only link back to their personal websites or to other non-TER advertising sites.   So much for rules.  Kinda like the rules for this board which stipulate courtesy, decency, and decorum; and which specifically prohibit namecalling.   Obviously, again, not enforced.    
No sooner did I raise a perfectly legitimate issue for discussion, in a constructive manner, than I was called “cowardly”, “whiney”, a “puss”, a “bitch”, and ordered repeatedly to name names.  Fuck this board.  Y’all don’t abide by any rules, and y’all are rude as fuck.  Sorry I raised the issue.  
Bye bye.

Yes, the mannered discussion that we're supposed to engage in per posting policy is frequently stressed. But in part that stems from so many in the group wanting that type of interaction -- many are happy to talk trash and trade insults. Exactly where for TER to draw the line is difficult (but agree that the current management is a lot more lax about the officially stated rules and have not really gone back to rewrite anything much). But some have been banned or placed on probation for exactly what you are pointing at -- so rather than no enforced I think you have a differing view on how to apply the rule and what is or is not a violation. Not a simple bit even for lawyers who make a living out of writing documents to remove all wiggle room and differences in interpretation.  

My viewpoints are based on many things and living in both the urban and rural environments hasn't created any desire to suck cock, rim trannies or have sex with house pets.  I'm comfortably remaining in my "bubble" I guess.  

Its your story, you tell if how you like brother.  

So if someone is advertising here but not allowing reviews here, that's on admin for not moderating that person's use of the site.  

So who is this mysterious rule breaker?

As it reads today, two others did like it but if you want I can hit the like button so it looks like 3.  

You and your 2nd account probably.  

Nope, just one account.  

Sure pal.

Just gonna bump this in the unlikely event that someone, anyone, appreciates a little bit of context mixed with fact.

He’ll want the last word , you’ll want the last word and on and on these threads will go.
Why don’t both of you get room and duke it out .., last man out wins
My gawd… boys will be … boys

It will end with other dude going full OCD because he takes this very seriously.  

They will remove them.