I wouldn't add the tattoo option, like you you said I don't object or don't  think tats can't be sexy.
They certainly can, I just like the more conservative look?

Something strange to add, I perfer tattos, on white Women, more so than on black Women.

tattoos

tattoos in the right places can be very appealing and provocative..

and it is part of what makes her sexy, since it reflects her personality.

But I agree that tats are not sexy on some women.








-- Modified on 10/16/2012 9:41:56 PM

Krista Starr comes to mind. Nikki Hott was another fav of mine. Not for everyone, but these ladies wear their ink quite well. If you don't like it, just move on, why even bring it up.

Depends on the tattoo and the girl.
The size, quality, color, design, and placement of the tattoo are crucial.

However, some not-so-sexy ones would be any names or coverups of names, written text, large tattoos covering the back or lower back, facial tattoos, full arm sleeves, and tattoos on legs -- I'm a leg guy so if a tattoo covers any part of her leg, it's a no no for me.

To each his own,

is right, but, one of the most erotic women ( provider ) i have ever laid eyes on, is covered with body art.
In some of her pics, she looks like Marilyn Monroe, she's gorgeous.
And kinky....damn!!!

I was traveling recently and stopped by a strip club with my fellow consultants. Hadn't been to one in awhile since I'd rather spend my money hobbying.

At the club, I didn't get one dance as every "entertainer" had some prison/ghetto font tattooed across one her boobs! And it wasn't a rose or a flower...it was some prison/ghetto font with some name on it or something. Twenty something girls and I didn't see one chest without it. Seriously, I don't get it.

That's not talking the sleeves, the mix and match - I have a bi-polar approach to permanently defacing my body with clashing colors and themes.

I'd rather get a lap dance from that weird chick who turned herself into a cat than a chick with sleeves and ghetto font on one of her boobs.

I don't expect rocket science, but I am paying for atmosphere. A warm apple pie is a warm apple pie,  you pay for the atmosphere. The tattoo needle bursts my illusion.

I know everyone has different tastes, but

sometimes I think some of you should shop for escorts in a convent. Very few women under 30 aren't inked. My new favorite quote, " Are we escorts, or are we nuns." Like you said, to each is their own. The beauty of this hobby is whatever your fantasy may be, there is a woman to suit that fancy.

"The only difference between tattooed people and non-tattooed people is: tattooed people don't care if you're not tattooed."

We probably don't get your choice of facial hair, shirt you wore today or ugly socks. JK! I really don't care about those things.

Relax and move along. There are plenty of women without tattoos.

Tattoos to me are indicative of a more alternative/rock 'n' roll lifestyle.  And that can be great.  I used to see this girl Kasey Miller, who was based in Orange County, CA.  She had a buncha tats on her, but it was cool because I would see her when I wanted to see that Affliction/Sinful clothing-line model kinda look.

Different strokes...

I wouldn't wanna bring Kasey to a black-tie event in Manhattan...or maybe I would, just to be different.

Sadly, Kasey is retired now.  But she was a great example of a hot tattooed girl.

There was a controversy on my local board about providers who have a tattooed 'pimp stamp' over their left breast.   According to several posters, every girl in a pimp's stable will have that stamp.  One example was a crown tat over the left breast, supposedly the symbol of a major pimp in the area.  

I don't know if this is true or not.  But when I starting looking at provider photos, I did notice that crown tat over the left breast of a few local providers.  Whether it was a pimp stamp or an advertising logo or some kabbala symbol, I cannot say.    --z

I don't prefer one way or the other, but if a girl looks like she has a jailhouse tattoo, that is just sad.

Tattoos on women are gross.  I do not like them.
I don't think they add anything to a women's appearance.  
But a lot of women in the business do have them, and I will see women with a few tats.

If you don't like it then move on. I have a pretty big piece on my back. And i am in the process of getting it all completed. It takes a while for a "piece" to be finished. I personally love it, it's sexy and my clients I have seen lately really admire it. It's flowers, vines, leaves and butterflies and it goes with the flow of my body. VERY ultra feminine. And when it's done it will flow onto my right arm for a quarter sleeve.

When you look at me on the outside, you would never know I have Ink unless I am wearing a tank top or I am naked. I can cover it if need be. I am not a biker girl, I am the girl next door that can turn into the rocker chick at the concert or I can be the sweet, conservative nymph.

 Most men really DON'T care if I have tattoos, some LOVE it. It is a VERY small percentage of clients that stay away from an Inked provider. If anyone doesn't want to see me because of my body art(and art is is), then I am fine with that and it's for the best. It is also their loss because I am a very sensual and sexual woman and great to be around. I recently had a client the other day who is NOT a fan of INK, but when he saw what was completed of mine, he was amazed! In fact he reviewed me on another website, and raved about my Ink. Lol. It's good to try something different once in a while. But if your Johnson goes limp at the site of a tattoo, then I guess you should stay away.

 Now let me say, I don't love all tattoos. I am a firm believer that if a person is going to get a tattoo it should be a "piece". Something large, and substantial. Not little ones placed here and there. I believe some CAN be distracting, and a ad or silly tattoo can ugly up a girls appearance.

I'm willing to accept a few tats that aren't distracting.  In general, why a beautiful woman with silky, soft, georgous skin would ruin it with tats is beyond me.  And sometimes it's rather depressing.  Maybe she just needs someone to tempo her how beautiful her natural skin is and to leave it alone.

tattoos totally turn me off.  so i move on.  i know several women that i would see if they didn't have tats, but otoh there are several un-inked girls that i wouldn't see for other reasons.

we all have our preferences built into us, and who's to judge?  some guys find tats sexy, not me.

a little one here or there, i can deal with.  but large pictures or designs covering whole areas of the body doesnt do it for me.  but whatever floats your boat.  luckily i know several fine ladies who fit my bill, happy hunting to you all, whatever your pleasure.

OK.

You seem conflicted.  If you don't like women with tattoos, don't see women with tattoos.

You're welcome.

I associate tattoos with "white trash" people. When I was growing up, my parents told me that only sailors and "jail house people" have tattoos. It was always looked upon as low class.

The worst thing that a woman can do is put tattoos on her neck, beautiful breasts or abdomen since these are really sexual locations to me. I am okay with a tramp stamp on the back or a tattoo on the calf or ankle. These are pretty hot.

Have to agree with you.  Watched the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders TV show and first thing I noticed was no tattoos allowed, or at least not visible.  So, my question is, are they screening for higher class girls, or do they have this rule because the majority of viewers of the cheerleaders/dancers mostly find them unattractive or unappealing??

this post reminded me of Matty in L.A. some years ago (eom)

know who I'm talking about>? /

Jessica Jane Clement has a sick pin-up girl in her ribs that me drives absolutely insane. The rose in her shoulder is nice but too exposed for my taste. I also have a soft spot for asian girls with large back pieces or sleeves like Levy Tran. None of these two gorgeous woman are providers but if they were that would be a dream.

-- Modified on 10/21/2012 1:44:46 PM