TER General Board

Sex diseases?
hlecter 1900 reads
posted

I was wondering if a lot of the customers who recieve an "OWO" get a sex disease. Do the most popular escorts require a test before providing these kind of services?

saturnsky587 reads

There are many websites that will tell the risks involved in giving and receiving most sex acts and the corresponding diseases you can catch.

hlecter538 reads

I´ve read that. It sounds very risky. Why isn´t testing more standard? Why would somebody join those acts if chances are big for cathing a disease?

jeanvaljean24601492 reads

the back of a plane with nothing but a parachute attached to me.

Risk...not for everybody.

Try stamp collecting...just don't lick the back...it tastes terrible  :D

Posted By: hlecter
I´ve read that. It sounds very risky. Why isn´t testing more standard? Why would somebody join those acts if chances are big for cathing a disease?

Hi,

He took that parachute chance!! Regarding stamp collection: Use a damp sponge to moisten the back of the stamps!!

Posted By: jeanvaljean24601
the back of a plane with nothing but a parachute attached to me.

Risk...not for everybody.

Try stamp collecting...just don't lick the back...it tastes terrible  :D
Posted By: hlecter
I´ve read that. It sounds very risky. Why isn´t testing more standard? Why would somebody join those acts if chances are big for cathing a disease?

jeanvaljean24601351 reads

Hey cubbie....good to see you here again.

So..do you clean off your pussies with a damp cloth too?

Sheesh...get with the program  LOL

But I did do the jump...for real.  Scared the shit out of me.  But it was a total thrill.  Followed that up with zip lining the next year, and did the ATV out near Red Rock.

Not sure what we're doing this year...might just be drinking at the Paris and playing with "dueling pianos".  Pretty lame compared to prior years.

Maybe Ozzie and his boys will be there?  They've got nothing better to do  LOL

Posted By: CubbieFan2
Hi,

He took that parachute chance!! Regarding stamp collection: Use a damp sponge to moisten the back of the stamps!!
Posted By: jeanvaljean24601
the back of a plane with nothing but a parachute attached to me.

Risk...not for everybody.

Try stamp collecting...just don't lick the back...it tastes terrible  :D
Posted By: hlecter
I´ve read that. It sounds very risky. Why isn´t testing more standard? Why would somebody join those acts if chances are big for cathing a disease?

Hi,

regards to thrills!! I'm a chicken!! I've been to Red Rock, very nice!! No, I don't dampen a woman's pussy I dive right in for the awesome experience!! In regards to the OP's question about OWO!! It's a great feeling I wouldn't have it any other way!!

Posted By: jeanvaljean24601
Hey cubbie....good to see you here again.

So..do you clean off your pussies with a damp cloth too?

Sheesh...get with the program  LOL

But I did do the jump...for real.  Scared the shit out of me.  But it was a total thrill.  Followed that up with zip lining the next year, and did the ATV out near Red Rock.

Not sure what we're doing this year...might just be drinking at the Paris and playing with "dueling pianos".  Pretty lame compared to prior years.

Maybe Ozzie and his boys will be there?  They've got nothing better to do  LOL
Posted By: CubbieFan2
Hi,

He took that parachute chance!! Regarding stamp collection: Use a damp sponge to moisten the back of the stamps!!
Posted By: jeanvaljean24601
the back of a plane with nothing but a parachute attached to me.

Risk...not for everybody.

Try stamp collecting...just don't lick the back...it tastes terrible  :D
Posted By: hlecter
I´ve read that. It sounds very risky. Why isn´t testing more standard? Why would somebody join those acts if chances are big for cathing a disease?

hlecter379 reads

Why are people responding so hostile? I simply suggests more testing (both provider and buyer). Wouldn´t it be great to remove the risk of sex diseases?

jeanvaljean24601361 reads

And you have no clue as to hostile.

This is mild...had you posted this last year the replies would have been much different.

OK...take up coin collecting...then no risk of being sickened by licking the back of those stamps  LOL

Posted By: hlecter
Why are people responding so hostile? I simply suggests more testing (both provider and buyer). Wouldn´t it be great to remove the risk of sex diseases?

hlecter243 reads

Ok. So basically, people here are acting like some kind of cool "adrenalin-junkies" who just dosen´t care about consequences. Additionaly, I´m the frightened little "stamp collector" because I raise the concern of potential sex diseases.

Good to know.

Maybe the guys who refuse to have a test themselves, as well as request it from their "providers", should have an IQ test in addition. Maybe it will be hard for these "adrenalin-junkies" to see it on black and white though.

And for you to get on your high horse and preach...not going to influence anyone here I'm afraid.

Getting tested is ones choice...and many claim they do.

But I always assume that they haven't, and play accordingly.

And even if I brought my most recent results to a session...many STD's lie dormant for a fairly long period of time.  So seeing ones recent results are of no significant value at any moment in time.

So back down there preacher man...everyone will do what they will do.  And if the risks are too high for you...try something different with less risk.

Just remember...your reality is not everyones reality!

Also...no need to insult every member here either.  IQ tests indeed!!

Posted By: hlecter
Ok. So basically, people here are acting like some kind of cool "adrenalin-junkies" who just dosen´t care about consequences. Additionaly, I´m the frightened little "stamp collector" because I raise the concern of potential sex diseases.

Good to know.

Maybe the guys who refuse to have a test themselves, as well as request it from their "providers", should have an IQ test in addition. Maybe it will be hard for these "adrenalin-junkies" to see it on black and white though.

hlecter234 reads

The reality is objective. It is what it is, regardless of subjective interpretations.

I just think (yes, my subjective interpretation) that some of the users here seemed irresponsible, and very inpolite. They also seemed intellectually challenged. If you were implying that I needed an IQ test, I can assure you, that´s not nessesary. Not at tall. Maybe the contradictionary is plausible. Just speculation of course.

Posted By: moremoneythangod


Just remember...your reality is not everyones reality!

Also...no need to insult every member here either.  IQ tests indeed!!

-- Modified on 11/12/2012 4:53:31 PM

Was this NOT your prior post there hannibal?

Posted By: hlecter
Ok. So basically, people here are acting like some kind of cool "adrenalin-junkies" who just dosen´t care about consequences. Additionaly, I´m the frightened little "stamp collector" because I raise the concern of potential sex diseases.

Good to know.

Maybe the guys who refuse to have a test themselves, as well as request it from their "providers", should have an IQ test in addition. Maybe it will be hard for these "adrenalin-junkies" to see it on black and white though.
Yep...it sure is.  That was YOU suggesting that the incompetent and non-caring morons here all get tested...or have their IQ's tested.

So wake the fuck up...you are NOT the first monger to be paranoid.  Nor will you be the last  LOL
Posted By: hlecter
The reality is objective. It is what it is, regardless of subjective interpretations.

I just think (yes, my subjective interpretation) that some of the users here seemed irresponsible, and very inpolite. They also seemed intellectually challenged. If you were implying that I needed an IQ test, I can assure you, that´s not nessesary. Not at tall. Maybe the contradictionary is plausible. Just speculation of course.
Posted By: moremoneythangod


Just remember...your reality is not everyones reality!

Also...no need to insult every member here either.  IQ tests indeed!!

-- Modified on 11/12/2012 4:53:31 PM
And FWIW very few of the people on these boards is not well aware of the inherent risks here.  So knock off the preaching there Elmer Gantry...no one here on this board needs your sermon.  Take it over to the Newbie board where other new guys/gals might buy into your paranoia.

hlecter257 reads

Maybe people should be aware of the risks then. I´m shocked that this isn´t a more mainstream subject in this forum. You are not only hurting yourself, but also other "providers", in addition to that provider´s clients. You basically are creating an diseased atom bomb. This is extremely selfish, and should not be taking easy.

This is just common sense.

Maybe some self-education should be a more common practice here:

http://dating.com/articles/escort-resources/escort-health/whats-what-of-std-sexually-transmitted-diseases

this is so important.  There is nothing to be embarassed about.  If it is herpes or HIV create a code. eg.  I'll be taking some time off to work double time to cover expenses. (HIV)   You'll be a hero to us all.

I do it for MY own piece of mind, but gimme a break. If I test negative yesterday and fk a new guy today, that is another 3 months I would have to not work to remain 100 percent certain I did not catch anything from the guy I saw today. Get YOURSELF tested, and protect YOURSELF because in the end, that is the only smart thing to do. You can't believe another person is safe just because they tell you they are...just a fact I am afraid. If we were all oblivious to disease we would ALL be doing BBFS and other higher risk activities...not the case.

-- Modified on 11/12/2012 8:59:41 PM

Going back to the original question, NO test is required of any body for any act of prostitution where prostitution is not legal.  Regular testing has been required in every law legalizing prostitution and licensing prostitutes throughout Europe and other places.  

This is the best reason to legalize prostitution.

You are right! It would be absolutely wonderful if everytime you met with a provider, she could show you a sheet full of test results saying she's void of any possible disease. BUT...even if she had proof, how do you know she hasn't caught something since she was tested? How do you know those results are even valid to begin with?

Testing for sex workers just isn't a requirement.  Also, as someone who has worked in a medical lab, (in the ob/gyn field) I do know that some diseases don't even show up positive on a test unless the patient is having a flare-up. (ie-herpes)

When you dabble in the hobby, its a risk you take. I would like to think more often than not, people don't get diseases, but the numbers say differently.

I guess we just have to be as careful as we possibly can and use universal precaution: Assume everyone has something, so protect yourself to the utmost degree!

Hope that wasn't hostile. ;-)

No, it's interesting.  It's important to know.  Female condoms would help with STD like herpes and warts.  Your right about the testing, but the lic. requires the test is passed.  Now how good is the test or is lic real.  That's a question with all documents.  It reduces odds.  It tells us 270 she was HIV negative, that helps. No guarantee.  My birth certificate didn't come with one.

tg_baby390 reads

I'm on this site. I'm really hoping it becomes more widespread.

And I know what you're going to say - NO, it's not about bbfs...I wear condoms each time, every time, but condom or not, I don't want to have sex with someone with an STD.

Even seeing same-day test results is no guarantee that the person is 100% safe...but still, it shows me that at some recent time, this person was free and clear. And, that he conducts himself in such a way that he is willing and eager to share his status.  

There are no 100% guarantees...but I do think that out of respect, we should provide (and be able to ask) for proof of STD status. (this goes for both providers and clients)



-- Modified on 11/10/2012 1:08:07 PM

You want to know how to have sex with no risk of disease?
Don't have sex.

You say, use a condom? Yeah, because condoms never break, fail, or slip off. No body fluids ever get inside or around the condom.

You say, have sex with a committed partner? Yeah, because people never cheat.

You say get tested? Please. You can get tested today and catch a disease tomorrow.

So many think they can "minimize the risk", and jump all over people who take more risks than they do.

In other words, they believe that the amount of risk that they take is just the right amount. Anybody not willing to take that much risk is a prude or a coward. Anybody taking more risk is a psychotic thrill-seeker.

Have a nice hobby.

jeanvaljean24601356 reads

Pretty safe alternatives too.

Well...not the skydiving  :D

Posted By: clarence37
You want to know how to have sex with no risk of disease?
Don't have sex.

You say, use a condom? Yeah, because condoms never break, fail, or slip off. No body fluids ever get inside or around the condom.

You say, have sex with a committed partner? Yeah, because people never cheat.

You say get tested? Please. You can get tested today and catch a disease tomorrow.

So many think they can "minimize the risk", and jump all over people who take more risks than they do.

In other words, they believe that the amount of risk that they take is just the right amount. Anybody not willing to take that much risk is a prude or a coward. Anybody taking more risk is a psychotic thrill-seeker.

Have a nice hobby.

when I was in my mid thirties. It was the best thing I have ever done. I equate the 90 seconds of free-fall to an orgasm. Orgasms do feel better, but I never had one that lasted 90 seconds. I know one guy who did, but he's dead now :-)

I know that women can have multiple orgasms. It's probably just as well that men can't. None of us would ever leave the house. GET YOUR HANDS OFF THE GOD DAMNED KEYBOARD, you are not fooling anybody.
Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy... you name him, he'd be locked in his room with a case of lotion and that Farrah Fawcett poster...

jeanvaljean24601195 reads

During the freefall you are bombarded with noise as the air rushes past you...

But once that chute opens...it's like another world.

Very cool indeed :D

or anything else is going to protect you, well you are not in the right place. I agree that there are a lot of careless people in this hobby who only give a fk about a nut, and take little to no precautions, but we do our best to avoid them. Still, they find their way through the cracks.

Fact there is no required testing in an illegal occupation. Some ladies test some do not. Much like the guys that do this. Do not assume the lady test or practices safety with everyone. Even the ones that test often do not get throat cultures done because of the reduce risk. Do you test and get through swabs? I do

The risk for the ladies is higher for "OWO" then for guys. Fact is you can get several STD's even if the risk is lower than unprotected vaginal sex. I got chlamydia in that way. Do your own homework but here is an article on it: http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/how_risky_is_oral_sex/ Not safe but safer, if you are uncomfortable use a condom or just don't play. You can get sick from OWO. How common is it? No one knows. That is the truth.

First and foremost...your mantra should always be, be it in the hobby world or in the civilian world, "there is no such thing as safe sex, only safer sex."

With that in mind, it's up to each and every person to decide how much risk they are personally comfortable with. That requires becoming as educated as possible about what the risks are. Fellatio is a very low risk activity when it comes to HIV. It does pose higher risks for STDs like chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis...and there is more risk for the giver than the receiver. Therefore, it is less risky of an activity when the giver does not ingest semen, or at least spits it out quickly.

There is a chance that you could get herpes through OWO, but the chances of that are vanishingly small. Herpes Simplex 1 is the virus that causes cold sores, and 80% of the population has it. A majority of carriers are largely asymptomatic. Herpes Simplex 2 is the virus that causes genital herpes. The chances that someone has HS1 on their genitals or HS2 on their mouth is highly unlikely...but not impossible.

While testing isn't prevention, it does keep you informed of your own health status and helps to protect others. It is important to get tested often and regularly. Not all STDs have symptoms that show up right away. Syphilis, for example, can go largely unnoticed for months before stage 2 of the disease sets in. And many of the symptoms of chlamydia can be mistaken for other things such as bladder infections.

OWO-DATY-DATO even deep kissing all carry risks, the questions are: how much risk are you willing to accept? How bad are they? and what if anything can be done to decrease them?.  (Donald Trump, I am told, with not shake hands.) I have my own routine of prevention understanding it is not perfect, but I am not --at least at this time in my life-- willing to give up some of life's real pleasures.

Register Now!