This is a question for hobbyists.  Have any of you submitted a second review of the same provider which is less complimentary than the first review?  Do you feel it is ethical to do so?

as long as it's the truth, I don't see what the problem would be. It would at least let hobbyists know of an inconsistency in preformance from one point of view, and not just a difference of opinion between two different reviewers.

Actually, I am working on my first “second time post”.  I don’t think it will be less complementary, because my time with the lady was very nice again.  If, however, I saw someone for a repeat visit and it was substantially worse, yes, i would write it up that way.  Unless I thought it was an off day (for me or her) I’m not sure why I wouldn’t.

I have done a few "second" reviews but my experience has been the opposite where the follow up visit was actually better than the first time. It is as if the the formalities are already established & out of the way and we were good to go from there!!

Unfortunately, TER removed my "first" reviews of the ladies so there is only the second one remaining, so doing a comparison between the two is impossible.

If a guy gives a 9 10 a few months ago, but the next one was so so, don't bust her down unles it is evident from a lot of clients that her attitude is unrepairable.

I have seen a number of providers multiple times.  SO far my experience has been even better the second time or third time around.

Would I post a review that was worse than the original, Yes if it was an accurate and honest.  As I always state, you may not click with certian providers and YMMV.

I'ts policy for TER to keep just one review per hobbyist per provider.  See #8 (at the bottom of the page) on http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/review_info.html



-- Modified on 1/7/2004 2:57:22 PM

I think we (the clients) are the worse off for the 'one review/member/provider' rule.  

My follow-on sessions with several providers were so exceptional and intense, each has expressly told me that I'm not allowed to say what we actually did.  Not that I WOULDN'T write reviews if, say, 15 days of TER membership were dangled before me... (ho, ho, ho).

   -I had a very anal experience with a provider who "doesn't do anal" (her 1st and last - she says it hurt like hell but she wanted to try it);

   -MAJOR BDSM with a provider whose reviews say she offers "light spanking" (smug chuckle; yeah, right...);

   -a full-on DEEP throat fuck with a provider who THREATENED to whip my butt (she meant it...) if I didn't do it a LOT harder and make her so some serious gaging; and

   -a video-taped BARE-BACK screwing of an drunk/semi-unconcious provider who ordered her sex-slave (me), to wait until she passed out, then violate EVERY hole.  

YMMV, of course.

said video taped bare back and had sex with a drunk girl after she passed out.

Can you say Idiot???????

Dude, I am not one to jump on someone but if I were you, I hope and pray no one ever finds out your real identity. Obviously you have no spine. Can you possibly imagine what she would say once she becomes lucid and she said you raped her? I am sure she wouldn't but it could have happened, no matter how well you think you know this girl.

I won't even go into BB.  Let me go throw up....

-- Modified on 1/8/2004 12:27:06 PM

Well you screwed it up for the rest of us if you scared her off Anal. Too bad you didn't think about breaking her in right.As for the rest,no judgment,just not my thing.

Second reviews are treated like revisions.When you really think about they have a great system here.The ladies get reviewed once by us and we dont have to sort through a bunch of loaded self posted reviews from some provider who's service is not good enough to keep her too busy to have time to waste online

No one has scared me off anal. I've been doing anal for a long long time but it has been kept in my personal life if you really wanna know.

There isn't much judgement either. Facts are facts. BB is DANGEROUS! WTF???????????????????

Interesting. I have posted 3 reviews for a lady I've seen on several occasions and they are all still there.

Thanks for the heads up.  I pulled the 2 extra reviews and debited your account 30 days.  Please read

http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/submit.html

item #8 states

You may also submit an update on a provider that you have already reviewed. We will replace your old review, but you won’t be credited for an additional 15 days. Your new review must be a complete rewrite that adds something new to the experience in order for it to replace the old one.

-- Staff

Does this mean I owe you a review just to get back to even?

It's ironic because based upon the tone of your post, you are the reason why most of us don't want it known when we go above and beyond for someone. If I enjoy one thing with someone I will not necessarily enjoy the same thing with someone else. I'm not a robot, although I could play one on tv.

But bareback? LOL I have to laugh, it's so sad and scary. You may think that YOU are safe, but is she? She may know SHE is safe, but are you???? Knowing for SURE is way better than saying... "But she had a clean test last week."  And what'd she do in the past week?

Reality check on aisle ten please!

Best,
Tamara

I've not had the pleasure of seeing her.  All the above happened in different cities on both coasts, not in Atlanta.

Thank you Brooke, Centrum, Curves and all for your comments.  Yeah, I thought I was gettin' a little "out there", but my point was, if these nasty things are going on, wouldn't the community be better off being informed & having reviews?

-- Modified on 1/11/2004 5:53:56 PM

LOL.  Sure.

SexyCurvesDC is right.  We don't KNOW each of us is "safe."  I had tests some time ago and she had tests recently.  We're playing the odds, hopefully intelligently.

Back on point w/ the thread: any kind of kink ought to be in the reviews.  Two reasons this is not so: (1) the ladies don't want it "out there" - too confining... (2) TER wipes out your first review when you make a follow-on.

Result: minimal reviews that cover the basics but leave the "whole truth" to the reader's imagination.  An imperfct system, but all that Staff has to offer at the moment.  I'm sure he'd like to give us more, but economics, time & technology insert themselves...

Staff,

That's silly.  Give the man a free fortnight in exchange for (1) being honest and (2) giving you a clue when you clearly didn't otherwise have one.

It would be the "right" thing to do....