Am I the only one who thinks TER reviews are way too long?
I read reviews to help decide on a provider, nice to have details.
I don't feel like investing more than a minute to do so.
Maybe I'm wrong, I'll shut up if I'm the only one, just saying...

Sorry, I couldn't help myself. lol

And that's another reason TER should add a simple word search capability to the reviews. Looking for CIM or DFK in a Provider's reviews? Search them all at once instead of having to open them one at a time.
.
The Review Search form could have the same kind of search box as is found in the Forum Search system (all of these words, any of these words, exact phrase).

Is a lengthy review with no paragraph breaks. If I open the review and it's long, I'll read the first and last paragraph (if there are paragraphs in the juicy details. I will skim the rest of the review for acronyms like Dfk, bbbj, data, etc.  

When I think it's called for, I write long, somewhat (I hope) literate reviews. They contain all the requisite details, but they're not meant to be an abstract for a search engine. I'm in the minority (?) who see the experiences with these lovely ladies as something more than a list of positions and a menu checklist, so I write how it felt as well as what we did.

and gave up on it.. way way too long.. I just tried to find it again and could not.. It went on and on and on..

...my ADD kicks in and I stop reading.  

... I skip those. The last thing I want to read is a Porn story starring the reviewer.  

6500 keystrokes in the Juicy Details section of a review.  My reviews run from 4000 to 5500.  Some may consider them lengthy, but I use no more nor no less than required to say what I want to say, just like in my posts here.  Some are longer, some are shorter.  It depends on how many points you want to make in a post or a review.  

A well-written long review is very useful in my circumstance.  As a New Yorker, there are dozens of providers available in any given price range with comparable ratings and things they are willing to do (there were 37 ads posted yesterday, as an example).  The detailed reviews - the ones that are about the provider (and have paragraphs, yes) - are invaluable because they give me another window through which I can look to choose someone.  A really good writer can capture a lot in a few words, so I'll never just click out of a short review.  For me, the 60-second "Sexual Mad-Libs" are of limited use.

It's just one more review, not a lot different from the thousands I have read.

If it is a well-reviewed girl who does short sessions, who seems to do the same things with everyone then I just write down all the right things and make sure to include a few extra details that I might think are unique to me or the situation.

It sounds like Lexi thinks you need to be "punished."  Try to at least ACT contrite like you're not enjoying it. Lol

If the encounter goes as expected, then I can wrap up the juicy details in about 2 paragraphs, or so. But if I encounter anything unexpected whether good or bad, then I'm going to give details based on my experience if I think it's interesting enough to be worth mentioning, and if I think it's going to help her future clients make a more informed decision, which is what I expect in return when searching for a new provider. It might be time consuming, perhaps even painstaking, but I would rather sit and read through all the juicy details in preparation for my next encounter so I won't get caught with any bad surprises. Ultimately, the length the review is based on the amount of details, and the length of each detail is based on the very nature of the detail.

was when he said he, "took one of her taut breasts into his mouth and then the other."  Since she has 30" A-cups, he should have clarified if he was taking them both in his mouth consecutively or together, because with tits that small, either is possible.  Just a minor observation on an otherwise nice review.  

I did read it as promised, I just didn't pay that much attention to any of the details as I found them rather boring, just like the "juicy details" of most reviews of it's type.

..........  very true. I wouldn't dare let her know how much enjoyment a good spanking is.

A review with no punctuation whatsoever. Ok, maybe a period at the end. Sometimes these "sentences" are many lines long.  

and like to show how enjoyable she makes my time with her. I love a woman with a great prsonality and think it plays a big part in the overall experience.

Yes, X-ray, it seems that we are in the minority in writing considered reviews of providers that we see as actual people, rather than a collection of parts and warm holes for our sole amusement.

Nah, I'm just the co-star!

So yes they can become too long.  As to what a girl will or won't do, the most true thing in this hobby is YMMV.  Mostly verifying that they look somewhat like their photos, perhaps nice, peripheral things more than a list of items.
I don't need to know that you cuddled, and talked about her wonderful career outside of the hobby.  BUT if you wanna write it, by all means go ahead

And you're right, they are WAY too long.  If I hadn't written them, I would never read them.  From now on: brevity.

Excellent point and all I can say is "mea culpa". I've already decided that I'm limiting reviews to providers I've seen at least three times and thanks to you, I'm going to keep it brief.

No paragraph breaks, no punctuations and terrible grammar mistakes!

I'd rather open up one long review and scan it for details that are important to me, instead of opening up multiple short reviews that just talk about envelope/BJ/Mish/cleaned up. Feels like I'm seeing more of those than ever.

If someone is going to review a provider in a short paragraph or two I hope they can at least spell.

lol...classic, right on man.  Stupid me losing track of E-mail, surprised this post got response it did.

Thank you, yes, that's why I can't stand them.  My ADHD.  Doesn't kick in, it's always there, attention span goes tick tick tick tick....BOOM!!!  Pretty sure ADHD has similar characteristics to ADD

bluh blah bluh blah bluh blah, lol....
just kidding man, right on, I get you.
My issue with the details section (where provider lists services provided): a) they aren't always true; b) my favorite service (facial) isn't really listed (it is kind of under service CIM, just it's not a single isolate service I can zoom in on); c) other services I care about often list, "I don't know" for them.  So in that instance, I can either read the reviews, or ask the provider directly on the phone when scheduling (not advised)

Thaaaank you!!!

Right on Neil Diamond, spread the good word sir!!!

Thanks man, good food for thought, I'll keep that in mind myself.  You're right, it is common practice to have models looking very different from their ad photo.  I'll do my little part to buck the trend thanks to you.

"we pretty much all know..."

When I read a review, I don't want to read a list of what was done to a provider.  I want to read what the provider and client did together, how she responded and if there could be a chemistry match between me and the provider.  That takes more than a brief paragraph, but less than a sex version of War and Peace.  And remember guys, the review is about the provider, a human being.  We're reading the review to decide if we want to connect with her, not you.