After being on the board for many years, you start to see patterns. One of these is a provider who gets a string of bad reviews, then magically out of the left-field, a positive review appears that claims a monger got all these great services and it was a magical session.
Paula at bookalatina is one of these cases. There are 5 reviews that say no LFK/DFK, covered BJ and tried to short a session. Then magically review number six, the newest reviews starts with, "She launched into DFK at the door, followed by BBBJ and then I came twice in the session". Did reviewer A) Actually, get all these services because the provider wanted to fix her past behavior? B) A fake review because provider asked for a review C) Fake review from a shill account?
In this particular case, the reviewer that gave a 'good review' has a long history. So I'm thinking he got a 'good' session because she was trying to fix a problem of bad reviews, so gave him all these services that she didn't before, then asked for a positive review. I'd like to ask the reviewer who gave her a good score if she asked him during the session if he does reviews on TER. Your thoughts? Does a provider/leopard change her spots, or just a one time deal to get a positive review then back to her old bad habits. I've learned that past behavior is a good indicator of future performance.
I've noticed the same pattern - a bad review followed by 2 or 3 glowing shill reviews. It's a bad sign, and for me, a forget it conclusion.
I just honestly reviewed a provider, and a day later...a new review popped up from a user who's only left that single review...and in a location shes not currently at, as she told me she would be in my area at least beyond this weekend.
As well as being quite different from my experience with her, but that of course falls within ymmv factor...so thats not what I base my suspicions in.
BAL is known as a GFE agency, and Paula was strictly non-GFE in all reviews prior to most recent. Looks like she was put on notice to improve her review status.
I checked that reviewer’s history too, and he looks legit. Note that he states that he received services up to a potential 9 performance score, but he still pegged the session at 7. She wasn’t into DATY. She may have asked for a review, but this guy didn’t really shill for her.
So it looks like she’s upped her game some, but she’s not going to knock your socks off with her performance.
But if you look through the reviews of a few of the providers there....you'll see CBJ, little to no kissing, and other less than stellar service issues popping up in many of those reviews. I saw one lady from there, but it was back in the beginning frenzy of COVID....and she didn't kiss...at all! While I dont hold the agency responsible for that...I think they give their ladies free reign on what type of service they deliver. And while YMMV exists in any encounter...its more damaging to an agency....especially when its more than one of their providers delivering sub par gfe, and one of them being what would seem to be their " premier " provider.
To see if she has upped her game or if she remains the same as her lowers scores. Since her reviewer has history, I tend to believe that he got more from her than her usual review.
BTW, I'm sorry you had a real bad time with her. You deserved better for sure.
Steph XOXO
Thanks, appreciated.
Who gave her a good score if she asked him during the session if he does reviews on TER. Just send him a PM and satisfy your curiosity. I doesn't hurt to ask. The BIG question is how long she'll maintain her higher level of service or resort back to old habits.. Does a leopard really change it's spots? Time will tell.
Sent him a note, haven't heard back.
fake perhaps. One of his reviews on a girl's look and body, whom I've met repeatedly, not even in the ballpark.
That said, I wouldn't take a chance on this provider at all even if she improved her performance, which I highly doubted. She gets as much of business while she's here. This is not her permanent home base so no extra motivation on the sensual GFE part.
Thanks for your review which saved me a few coins and blue balls, by the way! 
Glad I could assist and keep some well earned dollars in your pocket. Sometimes you get a lackluster performance, but this was just horrible and borderline rip-off. Anyway, hope you found a good provider and had a good session. I had a couple of strike outs, but a couple winners going back to the better agency, Elite.
1) That guy is more experienced and better managed the appointment
2) There was a deeper connection with this guy
3) Some of the other guys were grosd
4) She read her reviews and upped her game
5) A combination
-- Modified on 11/26/2020 4:22:50 PM
Good observation, especially number one; managed the session better. I think we're push over sometimes and should be more assertive. But in today's world, 'assertive' ad making a woman do something she doesn't want to dois considered rape. What is the difference between 'making' her do BBBJ Jesus going BBFS? Why is that so different?
I am thinking while she was on her knees leaning in, I could have grabbed her head and not let her get up. Then making her give me a BBBJ. I won't be going back to BAL, as the service seems to be more street Tijuana style that escort service. But will be aware and act more quickly next time as an experiment.
With her face blurred and the reviewer apparently meeting her for the first time, it's not unbelievable that the agency could now be using a different Paula.
Is also possible the agency gave her an ultimatum of expanding her menu which she did but with such an unenthusiastic and sensual attitude the scores did not reinforce the narrative.
Just not comfortable and will not be around long. Guess only
I don't completely follow. Maybe the real Paulina was busy and a guy who had never met Paulina and was supposed to see her received a substitute. I could see that possibly happening. However, it wouldn't make sense for the agency to attempt to leverage Pauline's mediocre reviews with a new lady. The agency would be better off advertising the new lady w/o reviews.
I get what you're saying. However, I was pointing out that the reviewer did not include anything that positively identified this lady as the same person in the previous reviews. And her pictures do no show anything unique such as tattoos. Given a significant change in menu options and no verification that it was, in fact, the same lady, my first thought was that it was probably someone who looked similar.
I was wondering that, too. I know another well known agency that has pulled a bait and switch with me. It became obvious very quickly it wasn't the same girl.
With so many women working at BAL I could see a substitute to bring up her scores. What makes me wonder is why do they keep her at the top of the page as a premier model? If I was the only one who had a bad experience I might chalk it up to a one off or a bait and switch to give a girl who has slow business more business.
Anyway, just thought it was funny as I could look into my crystal ball and see this positive review coming a mile away. It was the fact that it was so different that got me to thinking.
Covers my thoughts on this. It would be reckless to assume that one good review cancels out five bad ones. The question is . . . . Did she clean up her act? You won't know what the answer is to that until you get a few more reviews. Its a watch and see situation for me. I would not book her without seeing a few more subsequent reviews.
True, she may change. A girl I dated in Baltimore, for example. Her website has her all glammed up, pixie cut platinum blonde, nice voluptuous (not fat) curvy body. She shows up with unkempt brown hair. She's lost a lot of weight, as the skin around her ass is starting to sag and is loose and boobs are delated balloons droopy pancakes. A shit ton of rules, just a disaster. I write a legitimate rule (she reported it to TER - and loses, I win - review stands).
Then I get a flood, not just one or two but five private mail saying they received the same bad service, and thanks for writing the review. What the heck? Anyway, point being a few shill reports, and then her reviews seem to be better afterwards. I'm not going back in, because why chance it. I know girls can have a bad day. If she had one with me, and she was really good looking but things just seemed off a bit or lackluster, I might go back in that situation.
Just interesting observing the patterns oh human behavior.
I get PM feedback on reviews I have written with guys telling me she was as good as I said she was, or that they ignored my negative comments, saw her anyway, and she was exactly as I said she was, much to their regret. Lol
Why don't you just PM him and ask? It doesn't look like a shill review, it actually doesn't look like he had that great a time. Actually she has two reviews since yours, neither of them were glowing and one of them was downright negative. I've seen enough that I wouldn't even consider booking this chica and I LOVE the Colombianas.
Most women who start giving services they really don't like to give rarely give them enthusiastically, it's like a girl who hates taking it up the ass, but who will allow it for a substantial upcharge. Unless you like to inflict pain, do you really want to engage in anal sex with a woman who hates it?
I sent him a note, but haven't heard back. Regarding anal, some guys love it when a girl says 'its too big and hurts'. I've seen girls upcharge as much as 200, so everything has some sort of price. As some guys have said, do you really care about her pleasure? I'm sure some guys can't eat pussy worth shit, and girls will fake liking it.
B) A fake review because provider asked for a review.
C) Fake review from a shill account.