Bit of a weird thought I had recently.

Sometimes I don’t think it’s just about the other person. I think a big part of it is the version of you that shows up in that moment.

There are days where you feel relaxed, confident, not really in your head… and everything just flows better. You talk differently, react differently, even small things feel more natural. And because of that, the whole experience feels better.

Then there are other days where you’re slightly tense, overthinking, or just not fully present  and even if everything else is “right”, it doesn’t land the same.

Psychologically it’s interesting, because your state kind of shapes how you interpret everything. The same situation can feel completely different depending on how you show up mentally.

So now I’m not even sure it’s only about who you’re with.

Curious how others see it  
do you think the experience depends more on the person… or on your own state of mind going in?

As that puts all the emphasis on her. There are so many additional factors. Did I get a good night’s sleep the night before? Did I hit bad traffic on my way to see her? Did I get bad personal news earlier in the day? None of these issues are the woman’s fault but may affect my mood when I see her, which in turn could leave me with a disappointed feeling after that she had nothing to do with.
.
This is very, very rare to be sure, but it does happen on occasion. The daily stresses of life certainly come into play at times. I have had 2–3 women tell me over 15+ years they were having an awful day when we met. That may come off as unprofessional to some, but it’s certainly human and, in fact, I was quite honored they told me. It led to a more immediate and meaningful connection, to be honest.
.
So yes, the guy’s state of mind can certainly affect things, as can the provider’s. No one is an automaton in this lifestyle, as AI robots can’t replace real women! lol.

Way too many of these posts seem to be doing exactly that. While just ignoring them is not a problem one thing I think the blast of posts has accomplished with me is to be sure not to contact this agency if I ever do make it to London for a visit. (Not really a huge interest in seeing Europe again but it's been a long time so might be interesting.)

three times a year as evidenced by my review history.  Last time I did not even look at the offerings at this agency while spending hours checking out the ladies at other places.   I concur with your assessment of the impact of these posts.  

If I wanted to play in London all I'd care about is how hot the girls at this agency are, what their reviews say and what it was like dealing with the agency re booking.
Any other issues just seem trivial.

Every-time I played in the UK I used adultwork. The agency’s were way overpriced compared to the Indy girls.

And, I don’t attribute these posts to the ladies who may work at this agency. If this was an indy provider, I may opt not to contact her out of concern she thinks this way. But an agency that at worst is doing bad PR I don’t care about.

The OP either has hot girls who are good in bed at a cost I can afford or he doesn’t. All this nonsense about his posting style leading someone to not indulge in his service is ludicrous.  
.
Furthermore, his posts are about as innocuous as any poster in TER history. His OPs are very vague, “ do you like door A or door B” options about vanilla topics. How they are controversial is a total mystery to me. He is “Mister NOT Hot Take Guy.” Lol.  
.
Thank you Nicky for restoring some sanity.

Guy (well if it is an actual guy) has made like fifty threads in the last half a year and youd think hed would reply to at least some of his own threads with as much "thought" as in his initial posts.  

But nah it's just a prompt hit and run. Yet again.

Given prostitution is legal in London I seriously doubt I would be limiting myself all that much. But given the impression of an agency with some agenda and its not quite clear to me other than attempting to influence or extract marketing data from me I'm not sure that is the type of business I want to deal with.

 
But everyone has their own criteria and rules for who they will or will not want to associate with. I'm merely noting that whatever the goals of this agencies posts here are, its efforts are slowly pushing me away. Of course, if all these posts have nothing to do with corporate image advertising I suppose it won't really care.

Literally every business has an agenda, they’re trying to sell you something. Every business is trying to influence you, they’re trying to get you to buy their data. If you’re afraid of a business extracting marketing data… you need to log off the internet. How do you engage in commerce, when literally every business is not the type of business you want to deal with?

What, precisely, has he said that you find so off putting? I’m struggling to understand how his generally benign, somewhat nebulous posting style where he often frames a vague topic as a choice between option A and option B could be so maddening.  
.
Of course, you have every right to think anything you want about the OPs thoughts. But I am genuinely perplexed as to why his approach would be the sole criteria to rule out a fantastic woman he may represent who might, based on your own independent research, be an otherwise excellent match for all/most of your needs as a provider.
.
It also seems like you changed your critique of him when pressed. You initially stated your objection was that he was overthinking the issues he brings up for debate, but then you switched to him collecting marketing data on you. Seemed like an odd turn to make, to be honest.

It's the repetition and nebulous questions and text that just grating after a while. While not sure my self, like others have said the post often come across as bottish -- which then is a step away form human. It is certainly an agency account, and while I agree with your prior comment about someone running an agencies and also engaging in the activity. But if it's not even another human behind all the inquiries and musing? What's the point really. It's a bit like the long stream of Shill Friday posts or the copy-paste of a number of TER reviews on another site -- neither seem to be about a personal experience that was had, just indirect promotion (and in the latter case a clear disrespect for TER's property rights in the reviews. Yeah, I know this is all illegal so what's with the silly ethics, right?)

 
Mostly I ignore the posts but still they are pretty much in your face as you scan the thread listing so does register mentally. So it's not really about any individual post but something of an aggregate effect in my case. Plus, if it really isn't a person communicating and exchange of human experiences and views but something else. Model training, as some have also suggested? When did I agree to that? Is that even mentioned? So I suppose if I were to actually try to articulate the key element that seems to be triggering the reaction here, I suppose it is about authenticity and trust rather than subject matter.

Of course and I choose which I associate with and give my business to based on the way they go about doing things. If I don't like how a company markets, or how they gather their customer information I look elsewhere. There is nothing different here.

 
For any that fine the posts interesting or worth engaging feel free to do so. For any that go to where the agencies operates and wants to see one of the ladies there, have fun. I'm just giving the agency feedback on how I am beginning to react to their engagement approach here.