they want the higher scores because it's good for business.  Don't expect that to change.   Just make allowances, PM reviewers, etc.

A lot of them should be scored 2/2 instead.

These hobbyists aren't KIND, they're fucking retarded, spineless, blind, weak excuses for men.

FaceFuck, I'm an 11!

i will shove any 7s right up your ass.  i am so exclusive, i'm paid $100k for a 2hour once a quarter, so i know those other reviews are fakes!

More annonymous gripes from an alias so we cannot see what scores THEY give.

Clearly you have no clue about the real world of scoring ANYTHING.  If nothing forces grades towards the mean, it will not happen.  Grade inflation is a fact of the human condition, so unless you are not human--or unless you believe the reviewers on here are not human--then accept that a guy who has recently had a very plesurable experience with a lady is going to rate her positively.

Whatever you THINK a 6/6 SHOULD mean, the REALITY is it tells the reader "this is a lady who is in the lower half".  You sound like one of those zealots who believes it is their single handed mission in life to correct what they deam is wrong.  If they hurt the livelyhood of a bunch of ladies along the way, well that is just too bad.  Their loss is somehow for the better good of the universe.

If you really care, how about you push for the elimination of numerical scores all together.  I know it will not happen because there are too many guys who would rather blindly believe totally subjective scores and then have something to gripe about because they were too lazy to do their real homework.

What I generally see is that the guys who complain about women's performance numbers being too high are often the kind of self-centered guys who do in fact get poorer performance because they piss off most the ladies.  Ever thing YOU are part of the reason why you see a lady with consistent 8s & 9s and think she should be a 6?

But go right ahead and keep trying to define for me and everyone else what we find attractive.  I will help you out:  to me, Angelina Jolie is not a 10, probably not a 9--i do not find her that stunning.  There are pleanty of guys on here who would honestly rate her a 10.  So when you tell us all the "right" answer I am curious to hear what it is.

To paraphrase a recent poster, "Quit bitching & lying".

Because their egos can only stomach effusive praise & fantasy

And their gelded minions just keep enabling em'

The below provider has pages more just like below.
Can ONE woman be PERFECT to so many?
(names removed for the obvious)


DATE   REVIEWER ONLINE STATUS APPEARANCE / PERFORMANCE
Jun-2011   **********     10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
Feb-2011   **********     10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
May-2010   *********      10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
Mar-2010   *********     10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime(writes a new 10-10 annually)
Jan-2010   **********    10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
May-2009   *********      9 - Model material / 10 - One in a lifetime  
Mar-2009   *********      10 - One in a lifetime / 9 - Forgot it was a service  
Jan-2009   *********      10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
May-2008   *********    10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  
Oct-2007   *********     10 - One in a lifetime / 10 - One in a lifetime  

I recently gave a provider a 6 for looks and gave a pretty fair description on her dress, body, and age.  She thinks she looks 30, however she really is 40 years old.  I believe (now this just MY opinion) she looks older than 40, but dudes in Utah kiss her ass when it comes to her looks.  Her other reviewers have given her an 8 for looks...this to a woman with a big belly, a big butt, and with strangely worn teeth.  When she read my review, which did not include those details, man, was she really ticked off, she wanted the review pulled immediately, and evidently she has been successful.