TER General Board

Risk Factors for various acts...
Scorpiomon 20 Reviews 8543 reads
posted

Does anyone know where I can find reliable and easy to understand info about STD's?  Namely, what is the risk in receiving a bbbj, giving daty, what to look out for, etc.  I'm having a hard time finding out what the risk factors are for a male engaging with a female.  Also, on TER, I never hear anyone ever mention they've contracted an STD.  Hasn't anyone even gotten an itch from a provider?  Any help is appreciated.

alphared4526 reads

Remember that providers are a high risk group and it is nearly imosssible to conduct a study that is based solely on unsafe oral sex. I do have a friend who has contracted heres on her face and mouth from her boyfriend. She has scars from it and the initial outbreak was so bad she was hosptalized because she could barely swallow. I also don't reccommend DATY'ing a provider that engages in unprotected oral.....

Generally speaking, common sense prevailis.  The topic of risk associated with activities have been discussed numerous time on this board.  I would encourage you to do a search.

Having said that, I have complied a few responses to previous post that I thought you might find useful.

[PS:  A special thanks to Clarence37, and Mathesar for your invaluable contibutions on this subject.]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In terms of STDs, and HIV common sense prevails.

For STDs, there are visible signs of breakouts, rash, cooties, discoloration of skin, scars, etc... that should ring warning bells.  The overall appearance, and hygine of the peson also should be considered.

Terms of HIV there is a lot of literature out there that helps dispense off several myths.  For starters, you cannot contract HIV by kissing.  The most common way to contract HIV is through personal fluids (blood, semen) getting into your body by accidental contact.   Be safe and wear a condom, and select elite providers who see select few screened clients.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
here's what has to happen for you to be infected with a bloodborne disease (HIV/hepatitis):
1) your partner must be infected
2) their viral load must be high (an infected person's potential to infect others varies with a number of factors)
3) you must come into contact with a significant amount of certain body fluids, like blood or semen; you must absorb the fluid through a mucous membrane or open skin area
4) the contact must be extended; the shorter the contact, the less chance for infection
5) your immune system must be unable to fight off the infection

rough anal sex is the most likely to spread bloodborne disease; oral sex is the least. there is no documented case of anyone ever contacting HIV through receiving oral sex; you could get it through performing but it is unlikely. if you do perform bbjtc, take a facial or swallow it and rinse quickly to reduce your risk to almost zero (the acid in your stomach will kill the virus). holding it in your mouth for an extended time is the worst thing you can do.

odds of contracting HIV through unprotected sex? estimated at approximately .3% (3 in 1000). odds of contracting HIV through unprotected sex with a KNOWN INFECTED partner? i've seen it estimated at anywhere from 1% to no more than 12%.

check out the link i've included for lots of Q&A, or do a search on HIV, BLOODBORNE, STD, etc. there's a ton of info out there.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

A provider who sees two guys a day and works about 250 days a year will have about 500 dates a year. For the sake of discussion let's define a high-volume provider as someone who has 1000 dates a year.

A previous post said that 50 million people world-wide are HIV positive. The United Nations estimate I just looked up said 40 million at the end of 2001. Whatever. There are more than 6 billion people in the world. That is an infection rate of under 1%. I think the rate for the United States is about 0.3%. Let us assume 1% for the sexually active US population.

A high-volume provider having 1000 dates a year can expect to have (on average) sex with a HIV positive man about 10 times in a year.

According to a NIAID study (see link) using a condom reduces the risk of HIV transmission by a factor of about seven. I have seen other estimates as high as 20. Let's assume a condom reduces risk by a factor of 10.

If our high-volume provider is using condoms (isn't everyone?) then her risk in having 1000 dates with men with unknown HIV status is equivalent to having unprotected sex once with a man who is known to be HIV positive.

You would do better to be more worried about the HIV status of the provider's boyfriend or husband if she has one. She is probably having unprotected sex with him a lot more than once a year.

Don't forget that HIV is an EXTREMELY difficult disease to transmit. The following three paragraphs are quoted from the link.

----------
COUPLES STUDY IN HAITI SHOWS REDUCTION IN HETROSEXUAL HIV TRANSMISSION

A study in Haiti of "discordant" hetrosexual couples -- those in which one partner is HIV-infected and the other uninfected -- found that almost half of sexually active couples receiving counseling and free condoms adoped safe sex practices (either abstinence or consistent condom use), according to investigators supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The rate of new HIV infections among couples who consistently used condoms was one-seventh as high as those who did not.

...

The investigators observed a seroconversion rate of 1.0 per 100 person years for couples who always used a condom, and 6.8 per 100 person years for couples who used condoms irregularly or not at all. The seroconversion rates were similar between couples who never used condoms and those who used them irregularly, underscoring the importance of consistent, correct condom use. The female-to-male rate of HIV transmission was 7.6 per 100 person years; the rate of male-to-female transmission was 4.8 per 100 person years.

The investigators confirmed previous reports that other sexually transmitted deseases significantly increase a person's risk of becoming infected with HIV. Gential ulcer diseases, syphilis, and vaginal or penile discharge in the HIV-negative partner, and syphilis in the HIV-infected partner each increased the risk of HIV transmission.
-------

In other words, if you have sex for a year with a regular partner who is HIV positive and don't use any protection you stand about a 7% chance of becoming HIV positive yourself.

Athough it is obvious that the risk of getting HIV increases with the number of times you have sex with an infected partner it seems to me that having protected (safer, but not safe) sex with a large number of partners with unknown HIV sex is minor league risk compared to having regular unprotected sex with a single infected partner.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a useful link:  http://www.niaid.nih.gov/newsroom/releases/haitihiv.htm  

=============================================================================================

Previous Thread Links:

1/  http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=21956&boardID=12&page=10

2/  http://theeroticreview.com/msgBoard/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=24236&boardID=12&page=3





-- Modified on 7/12/2002 7:32:50 AM

-- Modified on 7/12/2002 7:43:31 AM

alphared2820 reads

This Guy has asked this question in order to educate himself and make a decision...when people do that here there are always alot of responses telling them to jump right in because the risk isn't so bad Hardly any from those who are more sane and conservative..think that the issue of std's arounds here is not treated with the respect that it deserves...What if your health care professional was so nonchalant about the treatment of body fluids? Would you be so cavalier about it if an orgasm or money wasn't involved? you can say gargling will reduce your chances to nearly zero....I have news for you pal that would be the case in a percect world but HIV is of course a virus and has the ability to mutate and change It's makeup and ability to infect vary dramatically based on many variables...far too many for us to really know the actual risk. The scientific model does not allow for a true study of the ability for oral transmission as there would be far to many factors in the study that would be  too hard to achieve for real meaningful results. Plus there are all the other variables...immune systems and or cuts and bleeding gums can increase the risk (I have often bitten the inside of my mouth on accident leaving an open sore) as can a persons ph level and whether or not they have tonsils if they have any other type of disease or compromised immune system and a person of course with full blown AIDS is more contagious than some one who isn't but one cannot always tell by appearance what a persons T-call count is....Then there are the multitudes of other things that can be caught this way. Herpes being the most inconvenient and incurable and as much as you would like to believe that a lesion or some other clue would be present for you to identify i Have yet to meet a client who really looked before diving in. It does spread orally and I have two friends who have contracted it this way...one from his mouth to her genitals...and yes the guy did have visible cold sores but she didn't think she could get it that way, and the other from his genitals to her face and as I stated before it was SEVERE. There is such a demand for Providers to perform BBBJ"S and The nochanlant attitude about the real ability to contract something and the risks we take is not realistic or in harmony with being a decent person. think If Just one infected provider that was providing unprotected BBBJTC's and hard pounding anal and was very busy could do in a very short time? if you knew there was a good chance a girl had something would you DATY after you knew someone had just been pounding her in the A#$ ? If you would then you aren't to bright. I think that we do a huge disservice to those who ask here for info in regards to this when we throw some numbers at them and skue (sp)? the argument for BBBJ's etc towards practicing them. You are making a decision everytime you engage in the hobby. Your decisions could have drastic effects and could affect Others in your life. It really Isn't that much better to justify it.
It is the perception that determines strength of arousal and feelings of pleasure and you CAN easily change your perceptions to increase the pleasure you get from SAFE activities. Personally I could have fun completely encased in latex if my partner knew how to talk dirty and set the theme. There are so many things that are intensely erotice Besides un safe Sex....use your imagination and try to make it a better experience in other ways and you won't even notice the cover. IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO...
Oh BTW If you inform yourself about the epidemic of disease and history of it's spread you would see that mother nature the harsh mistress that she is has managed to kill off many many times throughout history and frequently Prostitutes and the exponential effect they have on the spread of disease was a major contributing factor to the diseases success Where the disease was spread by contact with another human.

AVERT is a leading UK based AIDS Education and Medical Research charity. They are responsible for a wide range of education and medical research work with the overall aim of:

*   preventing people from becoming infected with HIV,
*   improving the quality of life of those already infected,
*   through medical research working to develop a cure for AIDS.

http://www.avert.org/

Thanks to those who replied to the initial thread with valuable links and info...but here's the net of my original question:

It appears to me most guys posting reviews at TER want...correction...damn near demand a BBBJ.  Now, either there is minimal health risk involved (since it seems so many partake without much concern) or there is significant risk and a bunch of you are in major denial walking around with your dicks about to fall off.

Which is it???...And I don't just want to know the 'facts', I'd like to hear personal experiences...

If there's minimal STD risk, it seems to contradict most conventional medical info and I'd like to know the big secret.
If there's high STD risk, then my TER brothers may be less than completely prudent...

carpevinum5559 reads

Bigger risk for the girl if the BJ is done to completion and swallowed.

But I think you know this already. So does everyone else but they either decide to live with the minimal risk or just not think about it.

So, if you're going to partake in ANY uncovered activities be very careful of any contact with mucous membranes (mouth, anus, genitals) and beware of any cuts, scratches or sores you have anywhere on your body.

is it possible no one would ever say they have a std because they know one of providers would not see them or vice versa.why would ter post a admission from a reviewer that he has a std,that would hurt ter business

Register Now!