The following review submitted by me recently was left unapproved because it wasn't explicit enough for the reviewer:
(the juicy details)
Our first kiss was in the elevator... slow and tentative, quickly leading to intense and passionate. We were barely through the door when she just jumped right into my arms, and within seconds we were deep deep into DFK land (oh how this woman can kiss.WoW!)
Dry humping on the bed, quick shedding of clothing, and the next 2 hours were filled with every combination of initials you can think of except S-T-O-P. She took me to the brink a half dozen times before finally swallowing me whole and taking every drop of an explosive orgasm. Kept sucking me and then teabagged my balls while stroking my shaft and got a second cup out of me almost instantly. This woman is insatiable, my kinda gal! I'm going to see her again. Maybe do some doubles too. This one is hot hot hot, and oh so tasty!
-----------
And yet, this following review, which I read in TER several weeks ago, is approved, and considered explicit enough:
She opened the door naked. DFK, BBBJ, DATY, and finally CG. Very satisfying. Will repeat.
--------------------------------------------
You will find many more like this among the thousands of reviews on this board.
--------------------------------------------
So why isn't my review explicit enough? Is a string of acronyms the real criterion behind a review being explicit enough or not?
Yes,I'm pissed off. I'm pissed off at the inconsistency, the duplicity, and the apparent double standard that has developed in the arena of review submission.
And before anyone points out than in the time I spent writing this diatribe I could have re-written and re-submitted.... be advised, I am a man of principle, and principles.
In this case, its the principle of the thing, and I do not like or appreciate the way I have been dealt with, or the way this situation was handled.
Let the buffalo chips fall where they may, but I don't expect you'll see the Doc around TER for very much longer.
-- Modified on 12/29/2005 9:30:27 AM
Well this is my first time seeing this provider. She is a SWEET GIRL, GREAT body to match & GREAT attitude.
Very accomidating. Pictures are accurate.
I meet her at her incall location downtown. She was just getting out of the shower, so she was still dripping wet.
We chatted, took care of business. Got undressed, put a cover on, BJ followed by a 69, tasted great. CG, sucked on those big nipples followed by a doggie until I came. @nd was similar.
(the juicier details)
Our first kiss was in the elevator... slow and tentative, but it quickly gave way to intense and passionate DFK and animalistic groping! We were barely through the door when she just jumped right into my arms, as she straddled me with her sexy long legs, I caught a whiff of her aromatic quim and within seconds we were deep in a DFK. I slid my hand up her leg and under her dress and wiped my finger through her crevasse, then I brought my finger between our lips and shared her love juices with her in the kiss(oh what a kiss, WOW!)
We quickly shed our clothing, as we fervidly dry-humped on the bed while I fondled her firm little ass. The next 2 hours we consumed each other in ravenous sexual ferocity. We engaged in every exotic combination of positions you can think of! She took me to the brink of testicular rupture at least a half dozen times before finally swallowing me whole and taking every drop of an explosive negative-G orgasm! She kept sucking me long past the last drop and then tea bagged my balls while stroking my crow-bar of love. To my surprise, she got a second cup out of me almost instantly which she held in her mouth and shared with me in a kiss! This woman is insatiable, I am more man than most women can handle and she had me begging for mercy!
I'm going to see her again. Maybe do some double penetrations too. This one is hot, tasty and is the standard by which I will reference all future sexual experiences!
-- Modified on 12/29/2005 11:45:31 AM
Well done; but, the spelling needs work!!
Olny srmat poelpe can.
cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot
slpeling was ipmorantt!
(But don't forget to include the phrase "I fukced har in tbe azs" so it doesn't get rejected....
A while back, I had a great session with a lady with probably 20 pages of reviews. I talked about how those reviews were correct, and went down a different road about how she turned on my brain AS WELL. It was unapproved, and so I basically added "and I fucked her in the ass". That became my fix for everything since. Try it at the dry cleaners next time...what's that spot. Dunno, but I fucked her in the ass!
that review is worth $6.33 to you, tops. I know you get paid more than that at whatever you do, or you wouldn't be hobbying.
So cough up the $20 and let it go. TER gets its reviews cheap because all MBAs know you can rely on people to be stupid, eg, penny wise & pound foolish.
I think you missed his point. His complaint is about the standard to which reviews are approved or not. Knowing Doc personally, I don't think the free VIP days will do much for him.
Personally, I think that getting rid of the free days would eliminate a lot of the fake junk that gets posted as reviews by the cheap guys. It still won't stop the fakes by self posters, however.
and the most well-meaning standard can only be good enough in any case.
"Perfect is the mortal enemy of good enough."
A bit like the soda machine that drops your perfectly good quarter into the change slot. Brains can malfunction like the best machines. Maybe he was hung over and had all the reading skills of a second-grader that morning, understanding only the big lettered words?
It would be a shame to lose you if that's what happened, Doc. I would just sent it through again, "rewritten" but with the very same words, as Yogi Berra would say.
you fail to identify the different positions you were in. Yes, your review conatins some explicit details revolving around your meat and potatoes, but nothing about what positions you were in during the session. Whether you use acronyms or describe it, notice how the other reviews, via acronyms, included specific acts - yours does not appear to say that.
Just my .02
I didn't feel like being explicit so I listed the acrynoms and got apporved. Perhaps they look for those keywords.
Despite your enthusiastic general account, you didn't tell exactly what you did. Did you fuck her or did she just blow you? Did she "swallow you whole" in her mouth or pussy? (Pussies can swallow too.) Was the blow job bare or covered? Did you dine at the Y? What positions were you in? What was the sequence of events?
These are the areas that were not explicit in your review but were covered in that other one-liner with just the acronyms.
maybe they look for words like DFK, CBJ/BBBJ, Greek, in the reviews as they are busy and can't read the whole story. If they don't see those words, they ddecline the reviews???
At least, I try to include those words clearly. None of my reviews has been declined so far...
is simple really. If all they want is a review that specifies what you did in terms of acronyms, then why bother with an "essay review" at all? Some of the best reviews I have ever read or written myself contained not a single acronym. so why all of a sudden, must the reviews all have the same boring conformist methodology to them? A software program that validates reviews based upon keyword presence may be more effective, but like all programs, it is limited to the scope of its programmjing. In this case, I'm not impressed.
Whatever happened to creativity in writing? Bah.
The review just isn't worth the trouble, and especially it is not worth getting yourself wrapped around the axle. They need you more than you need them, eh?
You don't have to justify yourself to anybody, and you sure don't need the aggravation in trying.
Jusfuggedaboudit.
If it's ANY consolation, I also know the feeling of rejection when my sterling prose is blue-penciled and flatly shitcanned. Many moons ago I was employed as a photo-reseracher for an audio-visual production company [our specialty was slide-shows, a thing now sadly almost totally extinct]. I was encouraged to contribute to the scripts as well, which I really enjoyed and appreciated. But in almost 4 1/2 years of working at that company not ONE SINGLE syllable [spelling?] of my work ever made it into the dozens of AV shows we produced. Some of which were pure garbage [but never the visual elements]. I was quite disappointed. But live and learn.
Also, you're the only guy on this board who is willing to post re the Near East AND refrain from calling me an anti-Semite. So YOU GOTTA stay. Thanx.
-- Modified on 12/30/2005 1:48:09 AM
That is the only think I can think of. Other than that, I agree with Zin...I think it would be approved if you submitted it again, especially after this thread.
as I have never submitted a review and have no near-term plans to do so, BUT, and this is w/o reading any of the responses to your post, it seems that your review reads like you're trying to write a Harlequin Romance for men. Fer example -- "our first kiss was in the elevator, slow and tentative, quickly leading to intense and passionate." Really, c'mon, were you recalling your high school prom date? [That, mild as it is, was the kind of stuff that earned me a severe beating in Catholic grammar school back in the middle 60s. So you know where one part of my delusions stem].
Lets face it, they're loking for something more along the lines of "I roughly unwrapped my kosher salami, greasy and hard and firm and on the edge of massive and savage explosion, and roughly plunged it whole into the wet and dripping folds of her inviting vulva, making, in my mind, the kind of carnal sandwhich, sadly, which would never see the light of day on the lunchtime specials board at Katz's deli. My mind quickly turned to thoughts of seconds and appetizers, although I had already devoured the main course. What what would dessert bring? I wet my lips in anticipation. And hers as well."
See?
and I thought you were supposed to whip it out and bang the hairy thing on the table to summon the serving wench.
the bawdy house at Mideval Times or the Rennaissance Fair [spelling?] or any other middle-ages themed thing. Could stretch to apply to Colonial Williamsburg, but I think that's about it.
Kinda curious about the providers at DisneyWorld. Whip out Tinkerbell's magic wand [does she have one]?
-- Modified on 12/29/2005 8:40:06 PM
whatshername the wholesome blonde babe is the only one I'd want to fuck.
try that trick at any Benihana's.
I'm not apologizing for a thing I've said during this stupid little drama i got myself into.
I still believe there is a flaw in the system that could be corrected.
I also think XiaomingLover is missing the boat. Benihana is a great restaurant. I personally frequent the Encino and Hilton establishments myself.
Ironically it was also a review of “Mia” (one of my earliest) that was also rejected several times for the same reason until I added the right amalgamation of acronyms to the mix. For proof of what little literary detail you need in a review other than acronyms check the overt brevity and lack of descriptive detail other than the inclusion of acronyms in the below link.
Three words and one acronym in the "General Details".
Thirty words(if you count “I”) and two acronyms in the "Juicy Details" I feel a new record in laconic reviewing has been set .
-- Modified on 12/30/2005 12:46:35 AM
The more you learn about commercial food preperation, no matter what economic level, the more likely it is that you'll stay home to eat AND switch to a liquid diet.
As for whipping it out amongst the flashing cutlery at Benihana's, no matter how adroitly wielded, really bad idea.
In the Grand Scheme of Things, if getting your review rejected was the worst thing that happened to you that day I'd say you had a pretty good day.
When I read this post the term "over reaction" was the first thing that came to mind.
You're right. It was, I did. Situation resolved to my satisfaction.
End of drama. Next?
Credit where credit is due. Staff listened, in the end there was cooperative action, and its all over and done with.
So who was the lady?!
Mia the Kissing Bandit.
Outstanding provider. Her rep is well deserved.
I write to convince hostile audiences for a living, and have been doing it well over 20 years. My peers & others regard me as damn good, and I flatter myself to think I might be.
About a quarter of my reviews have been rejected. I will be damned if I know why. I think that there's a certain variability that is just inevitable.
Sometimes it's enough to just resubmit the exact same review...a different person will read it this time and maybe accept it
The people reading these things all have different standards...what one deems explicit enough is not detailed enough for another person