Dear Doc,
I stated my opinion that I disagree with your approach to reviews and your style. If you feel like you need to defend yourself, by all means, go crazy. Heck, why don't you be in the pornos themselves? The kind of money you're spending, you could easily produce, direct, and star in your own! Then I can rent you at my local store, now wouldn't that shut me right up. You'll be the Dick Bass of pornography. LOL.
But all kidding aside, I would hope that your review record would speak for itself, but apparently you feel that it doesn't, IMHO that is telling. As for your challenge, I'll politely decline, other readers can follow up if they care (or are considering seeing one of the providers you've reviewed) and draw their own conclusions.
I do appreciate all the research links and photo links you have offered, but my opinion remains unchanged, based on your posts and reviews to this board (I made no claims about other boards), you are a "braggart" reviewer, more interested in glowing, hyper-positive reviews, rather than helping out your fellow hobbyists with good, objective information.
My opinion remains that many of your posts, even if not fiction, might as well be, due to their lack of any useful detail, and your proclivity to pump up providers (and yourself) beyond reason. If I'm not mistaken, the rating, "Once in a lifetime" means you should only use that rating once, however, you seem to use it quite liberally, just how many lifetimes are you planning to have? 
Again, all jokes aside, it's a matter of reviewing style, I'm sure many readers like your stuff, and although they may not follow you, they at least enjoy your tales. I'm not one of them. Again, this is my opinion, naturally, I don't expect you to agree.
As you mention, the point is mostly moot anyway, because the large majority of hobbyists are unwilling or unable to pay the kind of money you claim to pay for sessions. It's unlikely that many "follow-ups" will ever appear for many of these women. For this reason, I'll thankfully concede that your reviews are mostly harmless "Penthouse" forum style stories, not really sandbagging anybody with malicious or shill intent.
The reason I brought up Purelust's lack of credibility, is because you challenged 7Deadly for the same reason, yet now turn around and try to claim that Purelust is somehow more credible. You can't have it both ways. If reviews are a metric for credibility on this board, 7Deadly and Purelust are dead even at zero.
As for your postscripts, bringing up hatred, who has what in life, how people sleep at night, September 11th etc., I'm not sure where you are coming from with these points. Correct me if I'm wrong, but did I bring up any of these issues in my posts? I've simply stated my opinion of the material that you generate on this board.
------------------------------------------------
Workin' all day for the boss man WHOAH
Workin' for the company WHOAH YEAH
Bettin' on the dice I'm tossin' WHOAH
Gonna' have a fantasy WHOAH YEAH
iceman
Greetings i_c_e_m_a_n,
I thought you would do your followers a favor and confront me with my alleged faked posts but I guess it won't happen.
I know you will never agree with me but I would not say the same for you; if I see that you have posted something I find interesting or that I can add my little grain of salt I will post since that is what this is all about, sharing information and not attacking members because one has more resources than others or ones style is not acceptable to others.
O well, Peace to you and your followers and Happy Holidays,
The Good Doctor
PS. Since you are from Seattle I recommend you meeting Seattle's Pornstar Candy Cotton, http://www.eros-seattle.com/ads/se-cotton1.htm, considered one of the best currently in the circuit based on all but good reviews and very affordable $$$$$. I have not met her yet but I sure hope I do some day, peharps she could become your "Once In A Life Time" provider.
PS. As for my Postscripts, read yours were you mention about me sleeping with the light on, were you call me all kind of names, were you try to degrade and belittle me for one sole purpose which you would never achieve.
PS. Based on your theory of rating only one provider “Once In a Life Time” we would have to add an Edit option in our reviews in order to apply your theory and/or we would also have to throw out many good reviews from other members that do not partake with your theory and have rated many providers “Once In A Life Time” too several times.
PS. If you go to these other boards that have specific sections for Pornstars meetings and reviews you will get more reviews from those that I have already seen and from plenty others that I haven’t also. Meeting Pornstars is not a myth but a fact and has always been and there are High Rollers that due meet these High End Stars for $25K/day, something I would not do but that I know is very regular.
PS. When I spoke about those that do not post reviews I was refereeing to everyone and not to one person in particular and YES, 7DeadlySins and Purelust are part of that whole of members I was referring to and your theory of them not being credible because they have not post a review is pretty vague. Imagine if someone came on board and posted 10 faked posts from 10 providers that have been reviewed by several members of this board, does this make him a credible source? Know, lets say if someone came on board and posted 10 reviews of 10 providers that have never been reviewed before and since it is in a City/State that one might not have access to or do not have the resources, would that make him a non-credible source? Give me a break!
-- Modified on 12/19/2001 8:37:53 PM
...is an expression I sometimes use at the end of my posts, it means, leave the lights on when you are having sex. It used to be a slogan for a gym in Manhattan, as in, if you work out, you can "leave the lights on". I think it's appropriate for hobbyists as well, whether they work out or not--I think most of us appreciate the visuals. This has absolutely nothing to do with sleeping or a guilty conscience.
In addition, the other two postscripts were just taglines, one was lyrics from a Queen song called "Fat Bottom girls", the other, "Love in an Elevator" by Aerosmith, again, these were not part of the post content, just taglines, drawn from popular culture. With regards to the Queen song, I happen to be an ass man, as for Aerosmith, I tend to be a "nooner".
I see that you missed these references completely and somehow took them as personal slights, directed at you, they were never intended as such. Next time I'll be sure not to create such enigmatic references when posting responses to you.
You also seemed to miss the humor in in my pointing out that you liberally use the "once in a lifetime" rating. It was meant as a little dig at your overly-optimistic reviewing style. I have no doubt many others have done the same, they make me chuckle a little too. At no point did I ever call you names, in any of my posts. If you feel that way, I apologize, but would ask that you re-read the posts more carefully.
As for your "tip" about Candy Cotton, my advice is to read the reviews. I've met her at a local provider/hobbyist party, seen her dance at Rick's, and can provide an opinion on her looks and attitude. As far as service, fortunately, a critical, objective reviewer has seen and reviewed her here, and while brief, he mentioned several significant caveats. Amen. I would advise anyone to do their homework before booking.
Have fun, stay safe, and leave the lights ON!
iceman
Guys,
Here is Ms. Candy Cotton's most recent reviews from Seattle and Philadelphia were she is currently; Boards Members you be the judge of one credible source on TER and 6 hobbyists that aren’t from TER.
I am sure the next excuse Mr. i_c_e_m_a_n will come up with is that these are not credible reviews since they are not posted on TER and therefore are not verifiable under his standards or some other lame excuse.
I did took the time on reading through the gentleman's review and I do agree that he or any of us should NOT be pushing for a second round on those providers that DO allow it but by him addressing it, will help others that are wanting to see her to let her know that one is a Multiple Cup type of person (YMMV).
IMO, this does not make her a bad provider but as a valid point of improvement that wasn’t brought up on the other recent reviews but the opposite. I, personally ask this question as part of my research and when I go into the meeting all parties know what is expected:
http://www.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/national-pornstar/msgs/posts/12723.html
http://www.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/national-pornstar/msgs/posts/12456.html
http://www.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/philadelphia/msgs/posts/23769.html
http://www.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/philadelphia/msgs/posts/23787.html
http://public1.boards.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/seattle/msgs/posts/40680.html
http://public1.boards.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/seattle/msgs/posts/40409.html
Mr. i_c_e_m_a_n, I rest my case; after reading some of your highly rated reviews that were pointed out to me by some fellow hobbyists I was able to analyze your tastes and I can NOW understand why you might not find Candy as attractive as I and/or others might and why you don't find credible my posts even with photos that do prove that these meetings did took place but everyone has its own taste and there must be respected.
Happy holidays. I am looking forward for your next line of excuse(s)!
The Good Doctor
PS. BTW, Providers are Humans and are bound to commit errors (YMMV) like you and I might have but what makes them good providers is that they learn from their errors that are pointed out to them and improve their services. This is a general comment and is not meant for any Provider in particular.
-- Modified on 12/21/2001 12:41:09 PM
...don't you both think this has gone too far (and taken up too much space)? Get over it, move on, grow up.
