A recent series of posts on another board for escorts got me to wondering what men really want as far as body type goes with escorts.

All other things being equal, would men prefer petite, small, medium, largish or obese?

My personal preference is for largish, say about 170-190 lbs for a 5' 7" gal.

I do not place body weight very highly on the list of things that attract me to a particular escort.  I rate things like their personality and how I perceive their erotic nature to be, based upon their writings on their site and/or boards like this one, much higher.  I also rate things like their facial expression and grooming above body size; and of course, their reviews.  I have current favorites that range from a size 1 up to size 20 and have seen even larger women and have had a wonderful time with them.

Nevertheless, body size is a factor and I wonder if many men feel as I do about it.  Perhaps some providers, after reading these opinions, will have a better feeling about themselves (or perhaps, sadly, not.)

Please feel free to use aliases if you wish, even smart-ass ones.

Grossly heavy is out of the question.  Also, women who are weight lifters and are all cut up (never see a girl with bigger muscles than you).  Honestly, I feel it is more important that they meet one's personal needs at the time.  Sometimes,I don't want a GFE.  I want them wild, wanton and experimental.  I have seen providers who have been between 200-100, all good, some better than others.  Like all people.  Hey, I'm paying the freight, I make the call.

Body type isn't a huge thing for me, though it is of course a factor.
All other things being equal, I tend to prefer pixies.

That said, some of the nicest times I have ever had were with somewhat larger women who I would happily see again.
Fortunately, the ladies mostly aren't as harsh in their judgements of weight and good looks as we tend to be.  If they were I would never get one to let me through the door.

Her sensuality, level of intelligence and personality is what is most important to me and is what I remember the most, long after the date has ended. If she is able to rock my world in the bedroom, this is and added bonus and probably will motivate me to revisit again and again.  I have met more than one extremely attractive women that became unattractive once they opened their mouth. Physically I prefer small to medium size ladies that are
5'4" to 5'8" 115 to 130 pounds. I have always been attracted to thinner women but not so thin that they have run around in the shower to get wet (lol).

The initial attraction is usually the body. I too prefer a taller heavier woman, but I have run the gammut from a thin 4'11" to a 5'11"plus 300 pounder, and have enjoyed both types. In the end it is as you say, personality and attitude are everything. As I have said so often, beauty is not only in the eye of the beholder but also in the heart and mind of the beholder.

Reoes size matter?

Although I'd generally agree that personality is the most important factor, one cant discern this when 'window-shopping'.  For me I tend to stick with a women so petite that my penis *appears* big in relation to her...which usually means REALLY tiny girls!
 -- Doc

Tall girls, but not necessarily fat.  "Amazon" types if you will.  I have seen alltypes and had a great time however!

Enthusiasm, friendliness and generally making me feel like she's happy I'm there are what's most important. Bored, angry, or emotionless partners are a complete turn off. Intelligence and wit are fun and welcome, but attitude trumps all. Physically my ideal parter would be youthful looking, short (4'11"-5'4") and fit with a gymnast or dancer's build, but like most men I'm happy with any partner who falls into the general "fit, healthy, good looking" range.

Killer legs get me everytime regardless of height.  Great gams are not necessarily dominated by tall woman and for the most part, women with wonderful legs tend to be fit.

I'm a firm believer in the old pantyhose tag line...'nothing beats a great pair of legs (sp)'.

and that comes in all sizes;
cleanliness is important; friendly-welcoming personality is also important as well as enthusiastic attitude
rail thin-starved to bones is a turn off for me-better some meat on the bones.  
I've nevere hooked up with a very muscular girl, but the idea of one who could wrestle me to the bed and force me to engage in a variety of obscenely enjoyable acts sounds good.

I love legs too; toes on one end, pussy on the other.

How young is the limit? fantasy?
How old is too old?

My preferences are very different from what's been posted so far.  I like my female companion to be petite and thin.  Tall isn't a problem but heavy definitely is.  I'd put the ideal at around 5'3" and 105 lbs.  That tends to mean that they're young, although that's not a requirement.

Like you, mrfisher, I am not very sensitive to body type or appearance. I've seen ladies from 5'2" and 98 pounds to 5'10" and 250 pounds, and enjoyed all of them. What is important, I think,  is that they enjoy what they are doing.

However, I have discovered that there is something about the way things fit together when I see a petite provider. The physical sensations that I experience when seeing a petite provider make me last about half as long as I do with someone who is not so petite. This doesn't make my experience better or worse - it's just an observation.

Not at all.  Like I said... pixies :^)

Have to agree with the other posters on one point though.  Attitude trumps all

I have accepted the fact that I am a shallow, narrow-minded SOB when it comes to providers. If they don't fit my ideal profile, I rarely see even the hottest provider. I know I am missing out on some great girls but what the heck, it's my fantasy life and it works for me.