Yes, better warn them, and offer them an extra big tip

I have seen 7 or 8 providers by now, it was never a problem, we never even discussed it.  

The only people that have problems with uncircumsized men are...  circumsized men.

It's always been a mystery to me why male circumcision is popularly viewed as a desirable, normal and healthful practice while female circumcision as practiced in certain areas of Africa and the Middle East to intentionally reduce or eliminate sexual pleasure is viewed (and rightly so, IMHO) as abhorrent. Perhaps some of you have also wondered about this. It seems to me that the human body is a wondrous mechanism that has been fine-tuned by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution and which should remain structurally unmodified unless there is a medical problem that clearly dictates intervention. The circumcision of a male infant, quite frankly, strikes me as barbaric when done as a "routine" procedure and where there is no pressing medical reason for it. The male infant is held down, not anesthetized and square inches of skin rich in nerve endings are permanently severed which would arguably enhance the infant’s sexual pleasure when mature. Try that on an animal and watch the police show up on your doorstep and arrest you for animal cruelty! Yes, I know the tired old mantra about cleanliness, which seems nothing more than a poor attempt to rationalize the barbaric practice, but the daily shower that should be part of everyone’s hygienic regimen should take care of this. I think it’s probably true that the circumcision of a mature man is a more major procedure than in the case of an infant, but at least a person could decide for himself if he wanted to undergo it – an option that I was not given for the reasons of common medical practice and religion!

I prefer uncircumcised. Societal norms dictate that we continue this barbaric ritual on infants. Let them choose when they are older. Thank God that I don't live in Africa where they rountinely remove the clitorus.