Go to this website:
http://bugmenot.com

Copy and Paste the link into the box labelled "URL of site":
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/12/nyregion/12madam.html

Click on "Show Logins"

Enjoy

-- Modified on 10/12/2004 9:03:12 AM

Once again a Madam blows smoke up a reporter's panty hose and gets away with it.

The reason the Madam wants the security information is not to foil the LE.  It is to make sure she has a handle on the clients if they fail to pay or break bad.  She calls the numbers to make sure they are valid and so that the client knows she checked.  The Madam knows that if she is ever targeted by the LE, her pathetic security routine will not protect her, as the LE can foil her techniques in a heartbeat, as the LE knows them all.

I very much doubt that the Madam fails to keep records of the client's information.  This data is required to be kept until after the credit card charges clear and it also comes in handy if she is ever busted.

It is hilarious that the Madam requires a show paced, affectionate session complete with flower petals and candles, when she schedules the girls with 7 appointment per day and 15 minutes between clients.  After the first four dates, her girls are not into sensual or leisurely.  By the end of the week, the clients will be lucky if the girl bothers make the bed between sessions.

One does wonder how the Madam gets a steady supply of girls from Florida, Canada and California if she never meets any of them?  One also wonders how the Madam avoids getting stiffed by her ever changing staff who she never meets.  She uses local girls just like everybody else, with a sprinkling of out of towners.

I also find the Madam's views on provider discipline funny.  The provider is doing a misdemeanor, while the Madam is doing a felony.  It is insane to abuse the girls when they can rat you out to the cops and you are looking at 5 years in jail WHEN you get convicted.  Her girls are just like all of the other girls in this industry.  There are a substantial percentage of flakes, druggies, liars, thieves and fools.  She has to find new girls constantly as the old ones wander off.  She is crazy if she picks a fight with one of her girls.

BTW - How did she find out who Rachel's boyfriend was?  And he knew that Rachel was working anyway.  Sending out the photos to the family of a girl will absolutely wind up making an enemy of Rachel and the girls do talk.  The Madam didn't do this, she knows better.

If the Madam has a local stable of steady clients, then she must have an Internet site, as without it, she would not be able to keep local clients.  Thus her threat of steering work to her good girls is a lie.  Her clients pick the girls to see, not the Madam.

I also doubt the orphanage, dead rich drug dealer, idyllic early family life and insane weekend claims.  All stories designed to amaze and astound a silly reporter.

madam's seeming vindictiveness toward a provider who failed to show within one day.  I think she's asking for trouble if this is how she treats her ladies--especially since the article mentions that the madam's take is "tax-free".  This madam could take a few lessons from PC--including remembering the first rule of Fight Club.